And? I really don't get why hiring someone in the past means you can't continue to use their procured services. Just because your plumber does stuff on the side you would not condone, does not mean you should throw out your perfectly good sink for a new shittier one!....
It's not an issue of legality. Riot just doesn't want to be associated with someone who (potentially) sexually harassed others in addition to making homophobic statements.
Bad analogies aside, you wouldn't remove a Michael Jackson song from a product after his whole debacle... so why now does this crap go on?
The company in question might? Every company is different. Like I said above, Riot's own sexual harassment incidents automatically paints them in a worse light than most. They're being careful, that's all it is.
The whole "Guilty until proven innocent." comment kinda throws me for a loop.. so you'd hang a man just because a crowd accused him?
I don't know if you misread my comment or if yours is poorly worded; I said I don't agree with the "guilty until proven innocent" mentality.
That's just how it is, it's unfortunate, but people tend to see the worse in others without ever having credible evidence.