Skip to content

Verbal abuse is worse than inting

GYLDA··1 votes·2,499 views

One is literally destroying for others ingame and one is a muteable hatecrime?

The league community is known for being the toxic sludge it is today and riot are handing out bans like candy for "saying mean things :(" there are 2 reasons you should be allowed/able to get a little toxic each game and these 2 are:

  1. Mute button, a button which mutes a certain player.

  2. A fRIGGING language filter

edit. " im stupid and the title is ironic" I think that verbal abuse shouldnt be punishable

16 Comments

Timethief495 votes

Both is bad. Inting gets a instant 14 day ban, flaming a chat restriction, except if its racism/hatespeech stuff. Thing is flaming is much easyer to automatically detect.

GYLDA2 votes

so when 5 people report a guy that went 0/12 on purpose and stood afk nothing happened to him but when someone says a bad thing it gets banned bc its easier to detect.

I mean the only one who cant see that, that guy is inting must be blind or is their system so old or bad it cant tell?

2 Weezy Baby4 votes

nah inting is worse. I can mute verbal abuse. I can't mute inting.

GYLDA2 votes

Exactly!

Aladoron2 votes

But, but mah feelings!

ChaosReyn4 votes

It isn't a measure of what's more toxic... It's a measure of what IS toxic.

The only glaring difference is that one is harder to decipher. There's sometimes very little difference from a game where the player just (for no better way of putting it) fucking blew ass, and a game where they're clearly hard/soft inting.

But people flaming the ever-loving fuck out of their teammate or the entire game as a whole is very easy to see.

This is in regards to the automated systems they use...honestly in cases you feel people are inting, I'd say it's probably best to file a support ticket for a manual review. Let them view the replay, and they'll very easily spot the difference between "I'm playing, but I'm bad" and "trololol, ima steal my jungler's blue and run it down top!"

GYLDA1 votes

No mather who you are trying to contact they will say either "Sorry Riot Employees doesnt have any authority over this" <- (somehow)... or you'll be redirected to a robot that continues to redirect you in an endless circle of the same robot giving the same answers without being able to discuss.

Sincerely, been there done that

R107 Games1 votes

and one shouldn't be punishable because it can be negated. You cant negate the affects a troll/inter has on a game

Telephone Booth1 votes

I disagree, inting is much worse. Thats why inting has a minimum punishment of a 14 day ban, while toxicity's minimum is a measly 10 game chat restrict.

GYLDA1 votes

i fucke d up and there was supposed to be a questionmark after the title

Telephone Booth1 votes

{quoted}

i fucke d up and there was supposed to be a questionmark after the title

Oh lol. In that case i answer no. Haha i think you can request a mod to fix it, but yeah at this point its whatever.

GYLDA1 votes

I just counter proved everything and when people started writing the same opinion as I had thinking otherwise just confused the f out of me.

Telephone Booth2 votes

{quoted}

I just counter proved everything and when people started writing the same opinion as I had thinking otherwise just confused the f out of me.

Lmao. Well I see your edit now, and I dont really have an absolute opinion on that. I understand why its punishable from a business standpoint though.

RachelDawnAmber1 votes

you must have negative EQ

Saint Leønidas1 votes

So what i'm getting from this is that y- im not even gonna finish.

More from Player Behavior

More by GYLDA