B. Please review point B in your last post (not the one I am presently responding to). You wrote it in all caps, should be pretty easy for you to find.
C Yes, I initially checked your match history to get my own opinion of your ban, since you expressed doubt that it was legitimate. This seems like standard critical thinking 101, "Check the claims being made"
What you quote from me is not in fact an accusation, it is an assertion that the data you've made available to us is suspicious and supports the feeding hypothesis.
At this point I'd like to point out the irony of you asking me to "cool it bro" in all caps... Can YOU calm down?
D. I was initially under the impression that the ryze game was a ranked game, which is why I wanted to see your ranked games. A quick look at Lolking showed it was in fact a Normal game. I find no evidence of feeding in your Ranked games, but cannot see the "Normal games", which are the ones that need to be evaluated to prove your innocence.
I'm not sure you understand what the Inquisition actually was if you can compare someone asking to see your games to public executions and torture sessions. I am just asking questions, and instead of answering them, you are getting angry and playing the "I'm being oppressed" card.
If you wish for me to let it go you can either :
a. Cease responding.
b. Allow your normal games to be seen.
c. Concede the point that it at LEAST looks a little suspicious.