its time that remakes also need a 3 to 1 vote just like surrender to pass

Squidwards House·9/6/2017, 6:48:53 AM·2 votes·192 views

this happens very rarely but its unfair. especially when someone of the enemys says they will int, they actually do int, your kog maw is 4/0 before the remake but 2 idiots in your team still go like "lul iz stillll 4v5 itz tiem to romake" NO ITS NOT OMG its basically we 4 + their inting kog vs 4 of them. why is a 2:2 vote a remake but a 2:2 vote on surrender isnt a surrender? rito pls.

1 Comments

Chermorg9/6/2017, 11:33:58 AM1 votes

You may very well be doing great in lanes/jungle at that point. What you may not see is the top laner who's left alone getting 6 farm per wave for the next 15 minutes. Or the jungler who doesn't even have to gank because there's no jungler on your team so why gank? Or the adc who may be ahead in experience but is behind in cs and lane advantage because they have no support.

Remake exists because if someone doesn't connect during the first 3 minutes of the game, the team is already at a massive disadvantage, even if the afk reconnects. Just as surrendering is a vote, remake is a vote as well.

The difference is surrender votes are more common at times during the game when there is a much higher chance of comebacks/throws. 20-30 minutes into the game? Enemy fucks up baron and your jungler steals it? But you never got there because you surrendered.

Remake happens at a time that your team is being shoved farther in the disadvantage hole every second. Surrender occurs when the advantage/disadvantage is usually not changing and the game is based more on plays and misplays than on advantage and disadvantage. That's why it takes more people to surrender - you usually aren't getting more and more disadvantaged by the second.