How Many People Think Nubrac Should've Been Banned VS How Many Think He Shouldn't have been

Calebindestrctbl··5 votes·6,023 views

Just a quick poll to gauge how many people think the ban was justified vs unjustified

30 Comments

GatekeeperTDS13 votes

Can you add a third choice for, "Don't give a shit and want the boards to go back to normal?"

Thank you.

Calebindestrctbl2 votes

I don't know how to edit polls, but I'll just say upvote your comment if that's the case. :D

AeroWaffle6 votes

I believe the ban is justified if the explanation behind the ban is accurate (that Nubrac was choosing this off-meta strat for the purpose of aggravating streamers).

MasterDClone2 votes

It doesnt seem like the casse from what we see of him, he seems like a chill and fun guy. And he was in the top 1% of league players so like he isn't really doing too much wrong

Aladoron3 votes

Didn't he have an okayish winrate with it? It doesn't look like trolling...

Or is there a rule, which states you are forced to play meta, when you have streamers in your game? O.o

Spicy Rice3 votes

I mean, sub 50% winrates make you lose elo, so from what I can tell, he played other champs to keep his elo up, despite losing more than 50% of his teemo games

Aladoron3 votes

Yes, but sub 50% winrate does not mean trolling.

With trolling you should have around 10% winrate, in hight elo I think even less...

BladeSteel4 votes

Unless you’re not trying to be caught like a moron. You can troll (make players rage at you) on purpose and still win games. Only Idiots troll obviously, especially to have a 10% win rate. And besides that, he only started doing teemo support in the last few months, this isn’t something he got to challenger on.

C9 Aphrolift1 votes

{quoted}

Unless you’re not trying to be caught like a moron. You can troll (make players rage at you) on purpose and still win games. Only Idiots troll obviously, especially to have a 10% win rate. And besides that, he only started doing teemo support in the last few months, this isn’t something he got to challenger on.

Nubrac maintains he climbed from d3 or d4 to masters mainly off of this pick.

He is at 15 wins and 15 losses for his last 30 games as Teemo support. That's pretty long con trolling to go 50% over that many games. Or maybe he's just peaked at Master MMR with this strat. Or maybe he could have gotten higher if nb3 hadn't gone afk in game to use a Riot contact to get him banned. Tough to say really...

BladeSteel4 votes

He didn't start playing it untill late May, Look at his match history. He played teemo before May, yes, but It was 90% top lane teemo. It wasn't until late May that he began spamming it whenever he was in a game with a streamer to get a reaction. Take your hate for nb3, and shove it out the window, and then look at the facts. Idc what happens to NB3, but Nubrac deserved the ban 100% if you look at the facts. Smart trolls HIDE the fact that they're trolling. Doesn't mean it didn't happen.

C9 Aphrolift1 votes

{quoted}

He didn't start playing it untill late May, Look at his match history. He played teemo before May, yes, but It was 90% top lane teemo. It wasn't until late May that he began spamming it whenever he was in a game with a streamer to get a reaction.

The last 30 games played on Teemo were all support Teemo. 31 if you count the remake.

Take your hate for nb3, and shove it out the window, and then look at the facts. Idc what happens to NB3, but Nubrac deserved the ban 100% if you look at the facts. Smart trolls HIDE the fact that they're trolling. Doesn't mean it didn't happen.

I haven't commented much on nb3's role besides it being unfair that a "prominent" streamer can threaten to get people banned and then follow through. He's got his own 14 day vacation now.

I'm much more interested in whether Nubrac should be banned for playing off-meta in his own way.

15-15 just doesn't look like trolling to me it looks more like coin flipping.

Doesn't mean it did either.

ChaosReyn3 votes

Pros of Nubrac Strategy:

  • He got Irelia ahead early game
  • he put TF really far behind Cons of Nubrac Strategy:
  • Sivir was fucked all game.
  • because of is being 1v2 bot, NB3 was forced to stay bot to assist.
  • because Sivir was fucked, jng assist was meaningless.
  • Top now has no help, while enemy jungle could freely camp top, since NB3 was stuck bot lane.
  • Since he was leeching exp, Nubrac actually allowed TF to catch up and eventually outlevel Irelia.

Much more pros than cons...right? Why did he not adapt? THAT is why they say he griefed - he expected everyone else to just deal with it, and effectively derailed the rest of the game, particularly bot and mid.

Now, NB being a prick is also unacceptable, but imo, most people if presented with someone playing like this, would be the NB3 in that situation.

Aladoron1 votes

It's a suboptimal strategy, yes.

But have you ever seen people gettin' banned for picking champions into their counters, buying suboptimal items, or not perfect rotations, bad baron/dragon calls.

According to Rito you are allowed to play suboptimal, if you still try to win.

BestPudgeNA2 votes

{quoted}

I believe the ban is justified if the explanation behind the ban is accurate (that Nubrac was choosing this off-meta strat for the purpose of aggravating streamers).

He was doing it prior to ever playing with said streamer and him climbed for D4-Master tier using the strat. He also asked Riot directly if he could do it before ever doing it in a game and Riot said it was okay

C9 Aphrolift1 votes

{quoted}

He was doing it prior to ever playing with said streamer and him climbed for D4-Master tier using the strat. He also asked Riot directly if he could do it before ever doing it in a game and Riot said it was okay

This. People really hate strategies that don't meet their terms of "meta" though as vote is close to even.

DOUBLE TAPPED E3 votes

Boy if only there were some system in place whereby the community could make judgements on situations like this. Some sort of... court of justice... or some kind of seat or bench for a judge or judges...

AeroWaffle4 votes

So that other members of the community would then argue that the first set of members had an inaccurate decision?

Yeah, I'm sure that would solve everything.

I Like Teemo1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Queen Weeß,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lnbFnidZ,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-06-19T00:40:58.024+0000)

Boy if only there were some system in place whereby the community could make judgements on situations like this. Some sort of... court of justice... or some kind of seat or bench for a judge or judges...

reason it didnt work in the past, people just voted guilty all the time to get their free 10 rp reward and spammed as many as they could

Hypochondria91 votes

[{quoted}](name=I Like Teemo,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lnbFnidZ,comment-id=00020001,timestamp=2019-06-19T00:50:52.715+0000)

reason it didnt work in the past, people just voted guilty all the time to get their free 10 rp reward and spammed as many as they could

They added a timer you had to wait out before you could give a verdict. They also made it only give IP, if your verdict matched the final decision. That was how it worked the last time I used it.

Jamaree4 votes

[{quoted}](name=Queen Weeß,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=lnbFnidZ,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2019-06-19T00:40:58.024+0000)

Boy if only there were some system in place whereby the community could make judgements on situations like this. Some sort of... court of justice... or some kind of seat or bench for a judge or judges...

I’m sure said system would have no problems like players not using it, players abusing it and spamming pardon or punish just to get it done.

Look man, I miss the Tribunal as much as the next guy, but as much as this community wants to botch about the trolls, afkers, feeders, inters, etc, when given the tools to fix the problem they clearly didn’t want to put in the work.

CharDeeMcDenniz2 votes

where's the 3rd option where everyone just shuts up about it and worries about themselves

Madjack011 votes

{quoted}

where's the 3rd option where everyone just shuts up about it and worries about themselves

Where is the fourth option where the people who complain about the people complaining would just shut up about it and worry about themselves.

CharDeeMcDenniz2 votes

and what about the 5th option where people complaining about people complaining about other people complaining stfu...we can keep going if you want

really man?

Aladoron3 votes

Why don't you just listen to your own advice? :)

Nobody forces you to read this!

Calebindestrctbl1 votes

Since I didn't in the post itself, I'll post a link here to the summoner's code https://na.leagueoflegends.com/en/game-info/get-started/summoners-code/

MasterDClone1 votes

the only part of the summoners code that can be violated is number 3, but in that game 3 of his team members went afk so like they kinda brought that lost on themselves

Turtles Are Okay1 votes

The nuances to the situation are many and if you don't think they both should've been banned, NB3 more severely (to the point of the perma-ban and all affiliations nullified) and then the 3rd party who was the bridge for this happening, then you clearly should stay out of the situation.

Riot did the best they could in this situation. NB3 has a lot of pull and drives a lot of people to the game as a big content creator. Riot had to choose between a guy raking in money or some random guy who was trolling but thought he was smart about it by trying to hide behind this "I'm off-meta" thing.

Aladoron1 votes

So Rito bans players in an strange way, lick streamer's ass, and then do not care about the whole thing after it.

Is there anything new in it? I mean MONEY is always more important than sticking to your rules ;)

ToxicPlayerNA1 votes

Stop spamming with this issue. It's all over now. Let's talk about the other aspects of the game.

More from Player Behavior

More by Calebindestrctbl