Some suggestions about IP and punishment system

GIPSYEGYPTIAN·Oct 24, 2016·3 votes·554 views

1 - Penalty: 5 games low priority (5 mins) 2 - Penalty: 10 games low priority (10 mins) + chat restriction for them 3 - Penalty: 20 games low priority (20 mins) + chat restriction for them 4 - Penalty: 75 games chat restrict 5 - Penalty: 10 games ranked restrict (play any mode, sometimes players tilt on rankeds) 6 - Penalty: 20 games ranked restrict 7 - Penalty: Take IP from account, 50% of current IP + 50 games ranked restrict. 8 - Penalty: 1 month restriction (only Customs) 9 - Penalty: 750 games chat restriction 10 - Penalty: Permanent chat restriction (zero chat, made invisible) /here no one can flame, but if they start feeding, then awaits a permanent ban/

About IP bonuses: Make them bigger by 3 times, also first win of the day - 300 IP.

14 Comments

Deep Terror NamiOct 24, 20165 votes

They used to do [effectively] permanent chat restrictions, and it didn't work at all. People would just keep letting the restrictions stack and would continue being a problem to the other players for a very long time. Putting in so many steps and not moving to bans just lets people be toxic for much longer; some people just don't get it unless their account is at risk, and others just will never get it and need to be removed.

It doesn't really make sense to punish by taking away IP though. It affects people differently, which is unfair. Everyone needs to be treated the same, and taking IP would hurt people with more IP that still need to use it more than those that have less IP or those that don't need IP anymore.

GIPSYEGYPTIANOct 24, 20161 votes

It is actually good man. You never seen what a ban is. E.g. you pay €20,000 for the game and get permaban. You can't judge like this your donators.

AeroWaffleOct 24, 20163 votes

That's way too many chances. And as Nami said, Riot already tried perma-chat restrictions. They found that, more often than not, if they were bad enough to be issued a perma-chat restriction, they were bad enough to resort to other means to take their anger out on the other players (and either didn't care about the concequences or actively tried to avoid triggering the system).

GIPSYEGYPTIANOct 25, 20161 votes

Invisible chat, I hope you do not need glasses to read. (tried to say: Are you blind?)

AeroWaffleOct 25, 20162 votes

Chat is not the only thing that upsets ragers, it's usually the playstyle of their teammates.

GIPSYEGYPTIANOct 26, 20161 votes

But they cannot flame-back. You are not right.

AeroWaffleOct 26, 20162 votes

Chat is not the only method people use to flame back.

There's ping spamming, intentional afk farming, intentionally baiting fights (then backing out, letting teammates die), stealing farm from teammate's lane/jungle, etc.

GIPSYEGYPTIANOct 28, 20161 votes

Hello? I said that it will be banned.

AeroWaffleOct 28, 20161 votes

So you think that any automated system would be able to tell the difference between someone just playing poorly, and someone attempting to troll without being caught?

All someone has to do is make obvious mistakes that someone could make if they suck at the game, but do it intentionally.

IsoVhellOct 28, 20161 votes

{quoted}

So you think that any automated system would be able to tell the difference between someone just playing poorly, and someone attempting to troll without being caught?

All someone has to do is make obvious mistakes that someone could make if they suck at the game, but do it intentionally.

Do you have a job?

GIPSYEGYPTIANNov 7, 20161 votes

Does not matter, noobs are not wanted anyway.