Lets Talk about "Client Issues" Hovering Champs

So, perfection is not possible in life.

Given a small enough sample size, something can appear perfect. If the client has a 0.0001% chance of messing up at any given time, then you'd need almost 700,000 players to have a 50% chance of seeing one error.

So, why does the League client appear to "mess up" more frequently than other clients? Well, if you actually look at posts on the official boards of various games, reddit, etc. and take into account playerbases, it really doesn't. Other games may appear to mess up less - but they also are played less. Messing up 50 times out of 1 million players is the same "failure rate" as messing up once out of 20,000 players. However, those 50 players will claim "omg look at this another 49 players had a fuck up but this other game only had 1 total!!!!!!! WOW CLIENT SUCKS"

League has been the most consistently highest played game (i.e. not factoring in "fad players") for many years now. It only makes sense it will appear to "fuck up" more often than other games, even when the client is just as good as in other games.

Now, I'm not saying it may not be possible that the client doesn't have fixable problems. In fact, I'm sure it does - and you can see problems they're fixing in the server status page. However, having problems does not mean it's bad.

Only if Rito can prove intent. The act of banning a hovered champ in and of itself is NOT a bannable offense. It usually must be combined with other act of toxicity to show intent of being toxic.

Take feeding for example. The act of dying to the enemy over and over (aka feeding) in and of itself is NOT a bannable offense. For one lane to snowball, the other lane has to die, sometimes A LOT. Champion snowballing and killing enemies over and over is hardly a strange thing in League (you can easily end a game with 1/17/2 without inting because that Katarina or LB snowballed and you died if they so much as look at you). HOW you go about feeding or combo-ing feeding with other acts of toxicity like running it down or flaming and claiming to be inting will help prove intent and is bannable. Another examples are afk farming or split pushing. The act of afk farming (maybe to recovered from being behind in laning, etc.) or split pushing ignoring team fights in and of themselves are not bannable offense. It's the context of why you do it or combo with other toxic act/chat that will make them bannable if intent can be proven.

If all you do is ban hovered champs majority of the time, but show no other sign of toxicity or stupid enough to taunt your teammates or show intent to be toxic or aggravate your teammates will not result in a ban. You cannot be banned for using a legal function of the game even if you do it majority of the time unless Rito can prove your INTENTION is to be toxic. The built-in punishment for doing that is the odds of you losing majority of your games is super high.