Tactical disagreements not punishable?
According to riot support page, "tactical disagreements" are not punishable (neither is off meta).
So if I pick soraka top lane or nunu support and never go bot lane, those are tactical disagreements.
According to riot support page, "tactical disagreements" are not punishable (neither is off meta).
So if I pick soraka top lane or nunu support and never go bot lane, those are tactical disagreements.
Still not tired of carrying that pitchfork yet?
why not just give some time for Riot to actually review the case first (and reply) instead of burning the poor player support whom has pretty much no information in regards to why Nunu was banned (other than he was banned for role stealing, cos that's the only information that player support has.)
Griefing: Intentional Feeding – This category aims at punishing behavior that involves deliberately dying to enemy champions or turrets to make the opposing team more powerful while putting your team at a disadvantage. This is not intended for genuine mistakes or lapses of judgment!
Negative Attitude - This category is reserved for unhelpful or self-centered attitudes that go against the principles of a team-based game.
note the words putting your team at a disadvantage and self-centered attitudes...team-based game.
Stop making these threads.
It is NOT bannable. Going soraka top or NUNU SUPPORT WITH SMITE AND ROAM IS NOT BANNABLE. Bannable is not to communicate with your team properly.