Is being Autofilled the Reason i keep getting Chat Banned?

DivineGodKing·Nov 10, 2018·1 votes·1,666 views

Game 1 In-Game DivineGodKing: getting caught so you could type also worth DivineGodKing: report jinx for afk DivineGodKing: i dind't que as support DivineGodKing: i got autofilled DivineGodKing: whats your excuse? DivineGodKing: she raging while feeding DivineGodKing: idk why she trying to blame me DivineGodKing: i didn't que as support DivineGodKing: didn't ask for her DivineGodKing: call me whatever you want bro DivineGodKing: i'm not the 0-2 afk baby DivineGodKing: pretty sure i'm the one being trollled DivineGodKing: but sure try to deflect DivineGodKing: sat behind tower for 3 mins? DivineGodKing: then claim you want to farm? DivineGodKing: plzz DivineGodKing: get over yourself DivineGodKing: you want to lsoe then lose DivineGodKing: w.e DivineGodKing: i have more cs then you DivineGodKing: blame me more bro DivineGodKing: makes you better DivineGodKing: bro i didn't die DivineGodKing: you did DivineGodKing: cry more about the first two mins of the game DivineGodKing: all that matters clearely DivineGodKing: our team up 8 kills DivineGodKing: you still crying DivineGodKing: We are up 8 kills DivineGodKing: we are winning DivineGodKing: all you can do is cry about the first 2 mintues DivineGodKing: get over it DivineGodKing: i am playing rivern DivineGodKing: o DivineGodKing: i'm not the 0-2 adc who afked for 4 mins to teach her support a "lesson" DivineGodKing: i'm just gonna do my best to win all i can do DivineGodKing: why did you go in? DivineGodKing: hard game DivineGodKing: gj DivineGodKing: i swear they not taking damage DivineGodKing: gj guys

Those are my chat logs for the game. Once more i was chat banned an lost all my honor right before season end ( not the first time). I honestly do not understand how this level of communication leads to bans. I have seem and been flamed multiple times where people have cursed at me insulted my family and mother ect. I know most people have, i just don't understand why whenever i get autofilled i get reported and chat banned for games where i don't do any of these things. The worst thing i can imagine i said in this chat is " i'm not the 0-2 afk baby". Is "baby" an unacceptable key word i shouldn't be using?

From what i've seen commenting on "being autofilled" even if i'm just informing my team seems to play a role in me being banned. Going over my past logs they even added it from my -pre-game- logs. Honestly i find it unfair, i know being auto-filled is part of the game. But i don't understand why auto-filled games should be worth more when deciding who to chat-ban and strip of honor. I've posted all of my past logs when chat banned. Being auto filled seems to be a common trend.

16 Comments

AeroWaffleNov 10, 20184 votes

Was this your only chat logs? It looks like the game in question was several games ago and it seems odd that it only now gave you a chat restriction.

FaneseekerNov 10, 20183 votes

Maybe Jinx is not happy with a filler Supp. It is understandable, while you may not notice the difference, for the ADC it is usually night and day. A good Supp pretty much can spoon feed her to victory, a filler support can be frustrating.

However, It is not right to blame you just because you are a filler Supp. If jinx raged at you that is entirely on her, but you also wrote a short essay back, two wrongs don't' make one right?

BeatleZzzNov 10, 20182 votes

Spamming chat and certain flagged words (Computer bot logic) leads to punishments. Know how the system works and use it. Remember--if man makes it, man can break it.

Starforce was broken (for those old enough to remember what Starforce was). Denuvo was broken. And the "IFS" is also broken.

You can NOT have a computer do a human's job. Computers are for number crunching and automating tedious inhumane tasks that would make Mister Spock smile.

rujitraNov 10, 20181 votes

No, that's not how it works at all.

By the way, have you ever flown into an airport when it was foggy? It's likely that a computer landed the plane. Not a human.

Computers are very powerful.

BeatleZzzNov 10, 20181 votes

{quoted}

No, that's not how it works at all.

By the way, have you ever flown into an airport when it was foggy? It's likely that a computer landed the plane. Not a human.

Computers are very powerful.

Air France 447 would like a word with you. As well as Lion Air flight 610 and AirAsia Flight 8501

All caused by computers giving wrong readings.

Do you remember that one test flight of that 787 (somewhere in Europe), that was doing stall and recovery tests? The plane went into the stall then when the pilots said to put the nose down, the plane PITCHED NOSE UP, because the computer thought the plane was LEVEL and going too fast. So it ignored the pilots request to pitch the nose down to recover from the stall !!!!

Read up on it. the people all died.

Yes, computers are fucking amazing things. That GET PEOPLE KILLED when things go wrong.

rujitraNov 10, 20183 votes

Funny, because the first two of those were mechanical failures, almost certainly due to human error in design/manufacturing/replacement. Not computer errors. The last one was completely due to pilot error.

The computers do not give the readings - the sensors do, and the sensors were designed improperly for AF447 and for Lion 610 they were not replaced properly.

I think you really shouldn't talk about this when you don't even know what you're talking about. But, even if I were to agree that all three were computer error, 3 errors out of literally millions of flights since AF447? Wow.

More flights crash due to pilot error than any computer problems. Fun fact.

BeatleZzzNov 10, 20181 votes

{quoted}

Funny, because the first two of those were mechanical failures, almost certainly due to human error in design/manufacturing/replacement. Not computer errors. The last one was completely due to pilot error.

The computers do not give the readings - the sensors do, and the sensors were designed improperly for AF447 and for Lion 610 they were not replaced properly.

I think you really shouldn't talk about this when you don't even know what you're talking about. But, even if I were to agree that all three were computer error, 3 errors out of literally millions of flights since AF447? Wow.

More flights crash due to pilot error than any computer problems. Fun fact.

Sensors are part of a computer system, my friend. Or are you saying that your keyboard, mouse, monitor and other input devices are not part of a computer system? I Think you are confusing "CPU" with "computer" A CPU is NOT a computer. A computer is a SYSTEM. I'm not blaming CPU's here. Or "Artificial intelligence."

I think you should go to youtube and watch Air Crash Investigation.
been watching it the last 2 days straight.

P.S. I'm age 47. I was 2 blocks away from when that jet came down in Cerritos in 1986. I don't think you've EVER Experienced a plane crash in your life. I have.

rujitraNov 10, 20183 votes

If your mouse messes up and clicks the wrong thing, do you blame the computer manufacturer? No, you ban the mouse. The sensor provides data to the computer. If the sensor is providing faulty data due to faulty manufacturing, install, or design, that is the sensor's fault, not the computer's fault. Further, if the faulty data is due to manufacturing, install, or design, that is human error, not a computer error (unless the computers manufacturing the part malfunctioned, for example).

Once again, though, 3 flights out of the tens of millions of flights since AF447? Yeah. That's a ridiculously high rate. And by the way, how many crashes are due to pilot (human) error a year? More than computer error, even if you use the liberal definition of "computer" error you're pandering.

BeatleZzzNov 10, 20181 votes

{quoted}

If your mouse messes up and clicks the wrong thing, do you blame the computer manufacturer? No, you ban the mouse. The sensor provides data to the computer. If the sensor is providing faulty data due to faulty manufacturing, install, or design, that is the sensor's fault, not the computer's fault. Further, if the faulty data is due to manufacturing, install, or design, that is human error, not a computer error (unless the computers manufacturing the part malfunctioned, for example).

Once again, though, 3 flights out of the tens of millions of flights since AF447? Yeah. That's a ridiculously high rate. And by the way, how many crashes are due to pilot (human) error a year? More than computer error, even if you use the liberal definition of "computer" error you're pandering.

You're missing my point in a brazen attempt to say "you're wrong."

Computers can fail all the time. Or they can do their job. Or they can be hacked. Or you can put winblows 10 on it and watch the world burn :)

But NO COMPUTER SHOULD PREVENT A HUMAN FROM OVERRIDING IT AND TAKING MANUAL CONTROL.

That is the problem here. I forgot the name of that test flight doing a stall test, but the humans were UNABLE to take manual control of the plane because the computer thought they were making the plane go into a dive because it thought it was going too fast...

Skynet, here I come...

and yes, I know I'm arguing with you. I'm 47. I've seen my share of bad shit in this world. Hell even from the old Pascal (NO, Not the Nvidia cancer video card throttle bullcrap), and Apple II+ days, "To err is human. To really fuck things up requires a computer."

I don't deny that computers HELP. Yes they do. And yes they have made things safer overall. But you do not want AI to prevent humans from overriding it. Or you get Judgement day.

Look, dude. I'm not trying to attack you ok? But maybe i'm biased. 32 years later and I'm still afraid to fly. Because I still hear that sound of that jet coming down like it was a bomb being dropped by the Soviet Union (yes, they still existed then). I still have nightmares of jets crashing to this day.

Be lucky you're not me. Be lucky you're able to experience life from a more happy position.

rujitraNov 10, 20183 votes

What makes you think Rioters are not able to "take manual control" or override incorrect punishments?

Nik NikersonNov 10, 20183 votes

People get people killed when things go wrong.

Actually human error tends to kill way more people than computers error.

BeatleZzzNov 10, 20181 votes

[{quoted}](name=Nik Nikerson,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=Vzajoi7E,comment-id=0001000000000001,timestamp=2018-11-10T22:34:35.522+0000)

People get people killed when things go wrong.

I think this is the first time player behavior turned into Flight Crash investigation.

FaneseekerNov 10, 20181 votes

{quoted}

Spamming chat and certain flagged words (Computer bot logic) leads to punishments. Know how the system works and use it. Remember--if man makes it, man can break it.

Starforce was broken (for those old enough to remember what Starforce was). Denuvo was broken. And the "IFS" is also broken.

You can NOT have a computer do a human's job. Computers are for number crunching and automating tedious inhumane tasks that would make Mister Spock smile.

AI can do my job any day, so I can just find me a hot mama and have her spoon feeds me while I league all day. UTOPIA. Why would the hot babe spoon feeds me you ask? well, because them bots are doing everything around the house, including shopping!. That is why she spoon feeds her man while he leagues every day.

Dark dark future awaits us all. It is so dark, I love it.

Nik NikersonNov 10, 20182 votes

It's because you are fighting with teammates in chat. Not only that, this isn't enough to get chat restricted for one instance, so it kind of indicates that you end up fighting with teammates at a pretty regular clip. Just don't do it, and you won't get punished again.

EorochNov 10, 20181 votes

If you feel it was unjust you could always contact player support and ask about it. I've definitely seen much worse than that, and while that would generally be a set of messages that would make me upset in game, the punishment does seem a bit severe (unless you had other instances of that behavior).