Boards›Player Behavior

The report system needs an update when it comes to intentionally feeding, this is unacceptable.

LA Losty··8 votes·1,932 views
http://imgur.com/HPyr5eW

So a guy just posted a QQ discussion on the EU boards because he was "wrongfully banned". I got curious and looked at his profile and i am both surprised and disgusted at the amount of games this guy was allowed to ruin before he got banned for intentionally feeding. He has played 98 Rammus games, where he intentionally fed in 96 of them. 96 GAMES OF INTENTIONALLY FEEDING WITH UP TO 40 DEATHS BEFORE HE WAS BANNED. And this is NOT COUNTING the Aurelion Sol games (He has 24 of those, and feeded in the large majority of them). How is it possible that it takes so long for a guy like this to be banned? On Rammus alone this guy has 2156 deaths, thats 22 PR GAME. I understand that its difficult distinguishing between bad players, or just bad games in general and intentional feeding, but this is absurd. It took more 100 games of him running it down mid with as much movespeed he could stack before they realised something was wrong. He also only got a 14 DAY BAN. Something needs to change.

http://imgur.com/bIEitTo

(As you also see here he has alot of kills on the other champions he plays, so it seems like a smurf that he intentionally loses games on to keep it in low elo).

/Rant

20 Comments

Itankyou5 votes

OK.

Sorry bro, it doesn't meet the requirements of lytes intentional feeding algorithm. Therefore he did nothing wrong. Play on sir rammus, play on.

OK.

LA Losty2 votes

Well he was banned, but its a shame that he got to play more than 100 games where he intentionally fed before he was stopped :/

Itankyou2 votes

Ya it's unfortunate, but riot doesn't want to fix tribunal where HUMANs from the community can judge their actions.

I heard it is coming soon, before the end of the year? Forget where the link is.

But ya if u want to do this, start a new account and do that SAME thing, as long as you have never followed the recommended items, riot wont ban u as they will assume u are bad

LA Losty1 votes

Why wouldnt bad players blindly follow the recommended items though? :p

Magical Player1 votes

{quoted}

Why wouldnt bad players blindly follow the recommended items though? :p

Nobody thinks they're bad you don't lose games cause your bad, you lose cause your team is bad.... That is what people think

LA Losty2 votes

Well i usually take responsibility for my mistakes, but ive discovered alot of people would rather have their ego intact, thus leading me to taking the blame for their mistakes aswell :p I dont mind if people blame me as long as they focus on the game rather than the chat.

EvilDustMan1 votes

{quoted}

Ya it's unfortunate, but riot doesn't want to fix tribunal where HUMANs from the community can judge their actions.

I heard it is coming soon, before the end of the year? Forget where the link is.

But ya if u want to do this, start a new account and do that SAME thing, as long as you have never followed the recommended items, riot wont ban u as they will assume u are bad

The bot would be better at detecting intentional feeding g than a tribunal who might mistake a bad game for feeding.

Also, the tribunal system was just as slow if not slower at handing out punishment.

Dehitay4 votes

{quoted}

The bot would be better at detecting intentional feeding g than a tribunal who might mistake a bad game for feeding.

Also, the tribunal system was just as slow if not slower at handing out punishment.

Humans would actually be better at detecting intentional feeding. Bots only understand numbers that they've been told to understand.

Speed isn't the point of the tribunal. Accuracy is. The automated system detects toxic chat and does absolute shit about intentional feeding, intentional afks, trolling, and botting. Yet ironically, the tribunal will still get rid of bots faster than the automated system cause Riot does this bitch move where they ban bots in waves allowing them to play for weeks at a time ruining countless games before they actually do crap about accounts they know are problems.

EvilDustMan1 votes

{quoted}

Humans would actually be better at detecting intentional feeding. Bots only understand numbers that they've been told to understand.

Speed isn't the point of the tribunal. Accuracy is. The automated system detects toxic chat and does absolute shit about intentional feeding, intentional afks, trolling, and botting. Yet ironically, the tribunal will still get rid of bots faster than the automated system cause Riot does this bitch move where they ban bots in waves allowing them to play for weeks at a time ruining countless games before they actually do crap about accounts they know are problems.

Accuracy, okay. So if someone is playing AP Xin Zhao(or whatever is on the fringes), and went 3/10/6, they might get hit as intentionally feeding in a normal game by the tribunal. But it might not actually be true. Every person doing the tribunal would have to look at the system reports of stutter stepping, where the summoner spells were fired.

Yes, this person appears to have slipped through the cracks, making people like you rant and howl. But we don't know what percentage of the overall this is. How many is this one single game to the ones that DON'T slip through the cracks. I don't know. You don't know.

Ratbert1 votes

The thing is, tribunal looks at more than one game. I think even 25 games of such obvious feeding would be grounds for a ban.

ModUlanopo1 votes

Also, the tribunal system was just as slow if not slower at handing out punishment.

The Tribunal was hella slow. So slow that it was pretty much useless at affecting behavior.

Dereq1 votes

u are not part of a solution

wilsuport4coffee1 votes

why doesn't this have more upvotes

LA Losty1 votes

Btw i forgot to add in the discussion that he only got a 14 day ban, it wasnt even permanent...

Spartan45678901 votes
  • And yet i get banned for int feeding when i had a bad game too bad riot is to stuborn to admit there mistake. Even sent a ticked almost never had a bad games just stupid dynamic queue ruining my first rank game after 14 days of reforming for being toxic sigh
Spartan45678901 votes

http://imgur.com/S6HF77Y

BlZARREKOOPA1 votes

It's worse when two players on your team intentionally feed.

http://matchhistory.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/#match-details/NA1/2237120969/221418136?tab=overview

Warlord Kikosu1 votes

This was fun.. I hope I meet this player.

Ada Wong1 votes

Yet the system banned me for going Sona and feeding one huge frigging game awfully after having role stolen many months ago....

Perfect Sense Riot, I could understand a new player doing this awful in norrmal ranked, or dying a lot of times in Ranked when team refuses to follow or anything but 98 games in a row O.o?

LA Losty1 votes

I forgot to add in the beginning that he only got a 14 day ban, not even a permaban after more than 100 int games.

More from Player Behavior

The indefinite banning of Tyler1
Player Behavior4,799 comments
2,942
votes
14 day ban because playing Nunu Support with Smite is "stealing other people's roles"...?
Player Behavior1,525 comments
1,086
votes
Riot should add monthly status cards
Player Behavior241 comments
843
votes
Reminder that we haven't gotten our Summoner report cards yet :/
Player Behavior145 comments
619
votes
I'm not "triggered" by you throwing insults.
Player Behavior361 comments
548
votes
Black Alistar, King Rammus!!!!
Player Behavior462 comments
503
votes

More by LA Losty

Viktors E change will completely gut him
Gameplay51 comments
58
votes
Give veteran players an XP boost
Gameplay22 comments
47
votes
Why cant EU have nice things? :(
Memes & Games13 comments
21
votes
Turns out i just played a 6v7
Report a Bug5 comments
15
votes
Why do people say that the game is for babies when they get restricted/banned for flaming...
Player Behavior10 comments
13
votes
How to deal with Zed / Why do you think he is OP?
Gameplay9 comments
7
votes