Double Jeapordy Rant - @Riot, acknowledge your mistake and fix it
Okay, last post. I'm not sure how often rules are changed, but for some reason riot refuses to acknowledge that what they did do me falls under double jeapordy. Long story short I was chat restricted for 10 games following 3 matches that I was 'toxic' (Although 2 of those matches I don't qualify as toxic whatsoever, but that's aside from the point) I ate up the 10 game chat restriction and played 3 games, I woke up the next day and played another 3 games. Keep in mind in EVERY SINGLE one of these games I did not type whatsoever. I don't feel the need to type if I'm chat restricted because I usually type in multiple sentences and need more room lol. After my 6th game into my chat restriction where I didn't type, honored players, etc. (changed my behaviour) I was banned. No email - no proof, nothing, just banned. I contacted riot support and this is what they said:
1st email: Greetings Summoner,
As a new initiative to reduce the amount of toxicity within League of Legends, we’ve recently begun to audit players’ accounts for extreme cases of toxic behavior. Every account punished by this system was personally reviewed by someone at Riot to ensure accuracy.
After having reviewed your account, the decision to issue a 14-day suspension was made due to the extreme cases of toxicity we found, which included verbal toxicity, intentional feeding / griefing, being uncooperative with your teams. This type of toxic behavior has no place in League of Legends, and we will continue to punish players who exhibit this behavior.
Do keep in mind that suspensions are issued on 24-hour cycles; this means your suspension will be lifted at the same time of day it was issued. This will be within an hour or two of the time you received your suspension.
(He says I intentionally fed because I played a bad game and when the opponent pushed our nexus I sold my items and bought six tears, didn't even charge them, just bought them, literally lasted about 5 seconds, could've undone, and by the way I didn't even get reported that game, that's just the audit he managed to pull up, either way, I never typed that I wanted to or was looking forward to throwing matches at any point, ever, but apparantly I did. Either way this is aside from the main issue).
2nd email: I can understand the confusion here, but must reiterate that this suspension was manually done. So, as this suspension was placed soon after the chat restrictions were received, it is likely the Rioter chose to escalate this case due to the negativity they found. In my own audit I found some sample logs which happened to not be included with the chat restrictions. Overall, manual audits like these can overide action from the Instant Feedback system, and has led to this action being taken.
'soon after' is 1-2 days. Some of the games he pointed out took place 4 days ago 'escalate this case': This is exactly what double jeapordy is. I thought Riot wasn't allowed to do that? 'sample logs which happened to not be included with the chat restrictions': Sorry, these games were from days or weeks ago, I didn't even get REPORTED for these games, and either way, this was long before my chat restriction so what point is he trying to make? Here's a pathetic attempt to try to prove his point from the 'logs' he found that were 'toxic' but I didn't get reported: [1:44] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): mb was afk [2:14] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): wus low [2:18] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): they might have stolr ue red [2:35] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): o [5:42] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): greeeeeed [5:49] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): I'll getcha back bud:) [9:58] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): he lane ganked [9:59] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): lame [10:23] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): meanwhile wu is getting stomped [13:49] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): lol wut [13:59] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): 2 top [14:00] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): get mid [15:07] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): wu no summs [16:53] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): fukk [16:57] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): fizz is so annoying [18:25] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): yummy hits [20:10] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): yawn [20:11] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): ez win [22:36] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): yw [22:52] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): game too ez gotta givem something [22:55] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): feel me? [23:19] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): :( [23:41] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): NO HELP???? [23:42] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): LOL [24:07] [All] destroyer178 (Tryndamere): ez game
toxic???????? This game was 2 days before the chat restriction.
Riot seems to literally be going after people for no particular reason here.
3rd email: Hey Summoner,
We have already explained the context for your suspension. We will not be removing the punishment and consider this matter closed.
Even after I linked him this boards post: http://boards.na.leagueoflegends.com/en/c/GD/pNwvt4x2-riots-system-is-flawed-banned-while-chat-and-ranked-restricted-double-jeopardy-punishment-part-2
Where a summoner was involved in the EXACT same situation as me (Although he seemed to be a little more toxic) He was unbanned, and I still sit here unable to access my account for 2 weeks. Where's the justice in this system? Does it really make sense to punish me for an incident, and then punish me for the same incident 1-4 days later, after I already played games and improved my behaviour. This is unfair, and this is my last rant on the boards to try and get my point across and see what you guys think. Has anyone been through this before? What is the verdict here: Assuming I'm telling the truth, am I right? wrong? in certain cases? How do I fix this. I hope you don't jump to conclusions right away and someone is able to help me. Thanks!