Can we add a "soft inting" report option?
Every game passed plat 2 I have notice everyone just soft ints so they bypass the system. Can riot add another category for this and investigate these reports further?
30 Comments
Why not just report them under inting?
They are either inting or not. The "soft" business is just what people named it to make it harder to identify, ultimately if people are inting, it doesn't matter if it's hard or soft.
There are 2 things -
1.) Intentionally feeding.
2.) Not intentionally feeding.
There isn't sort-of-maybe-kinda-soft intentional feeding. If you feel someone is intentionally feeding, which means doing it on purpose even while trying to make it seem like they're not then report them for intentional feeding.
Report categories need to be quantifiable things, which is why Trolling isn't an option, because what's the definition?
those cases need to be manually reviewed and what exactly would be classified as soft inting when going 0/10 sometimes isn't even inting
No, feeding is not and never will be against the rules. And if someone dies intentionally, its inting. The option is already there.
Sure thing, button added, you should see it after your games
Idk how report system works but it SHOULD work like this, but the best way to spot feeders is this: if somone runs in to enemey, it DOES NOT count as a feed because: bots are EXTREMLY bad at spotting things like this it could be internet problem it could be one single rage, or tilt, that doesnt matter anyways, and the player played rest of game very good But there is something that bots are REALLY good at: MATHEMATICS At first the bot watches how much this player is getting killed, by which person, and how good that person who killed him is If he gets killed by a, from that bot bad rated person, once every 5 minutes, but at minute 25 he gets killed every 30 seconds by the same person at that isnt a exception, then he is definetly inting
I think if you reported somebody for soft-inting instead of just inting your chances of getting a manual review would actually decline. Simply because it’s much harder to detect subtle inters and in that case, one person alone would probably not suffice to justify an objective punishment. Also, just imagine the amount of soft-inting reports. No company in their right mind would hire so many people just to look at reported games. It would probably take thousands of employees for a big game like League where a lot of players feel the need to report almost everything.
Sorry but "Soft inting" isn't a thing. People keep trying to come up with various terms to fill out they feel about what is happening in a match and it's just not true. It's either someone is intentionally feeding or they aren't.