Naming and Shaming

PrimeWraith··3 votes·453 views

But didn't rito named and shamed Tyler1?

8 Comments

Aeszarck6 votes

The difference between players saying that "X ruined my in-game experience" and Riot saying that "tyler1 has ruined the experiences of many players" is that Riot's word is law. They're not really "accus[ing] others of creating a negative in-game experience;" they're more saying that tyler1 did create a negative in-game experience, as shown by his many bans, and this is the action that they are taking.

PrimeWraith2 votes

and that's why you downvote me?

ReadyxPlayerxOne3 votes

Not until he single handedly ruined hundreds of thousands of games by influencing people to be extremely toxic. And they barely talk about it.

PrimeWraith2 votes

I don't get "and they barley talk about it". what does that mean? have a seat right on that stool for me and explain.

ReadyxPlayerxOne1 votes

{quoted}

I don't get "and they barley talk about it". what does that mean? have a seat right on that stool for me and explain.

I'm not going to waste my time!

[zombie-nunu-hearts]

Kei1433 votes

he already is a public figure, thus the naming and shaming rule doesn't apply to him.

PrimeWraith2 votes

and that's why you downvote me?

Kei1434 votes

upvote and downvotes as much as manners matter to tyler1 (not a whole lot).

I didn't downvote you before, but now you say that, here: have a downvote.

More from Player Behavior

More by PrimeWraith