About support smite nunu

MHMega·Mar 1, 2017·7 votes·1,849 views

First, go to his twitch. It specifically states he will do it regardless of what the others in the game think. And second, this is bad because he NEVER GOES BOT or at least next tupdate never. That means that for his enjoyment, he lowers both the winning chances and enjoyment of another player on the team. If an add has to 2v1 early, the enemy will probably get fed, lowering the chance of winning. If he played support with smite, that isn't bannable. But it's the singed case, he doesn't play support, he plays jungle.

11 Comments

Kei143Mar 1, 20179 votes

http://th153.photobucket.com/albums/s216/C-fused/th_dead_horse.gif

Every time something controversial happens. whether it's tyler1, support smite singed, meteos intinng, double jg support nunu.

He got banned for it already and Riot isn't pulling that ban back.

TheFoxLordMar 1, 20171 votes

https://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/5wtk72/in_regards_to_the_support_nunu_riots_3rd_rule_on/dedr1vp/?utm_content=permalink&utm_medium=front&utm_source=reddit&utm_name=leagueoflegends [picture link]

"[...] Monday night, Player Support lifted the remaining portion of the ban. A bunch of us are meeting early next week to get our shit together, and we’ll be talking to you about it sooner rather than later."

Riot Games is a good company and they listen to their playerbase. The negative feedback for this incident was substantial enough that they're willing to rethink their decision and come back soon to deliver a more comprehensive statement.

Don't assume that just because "Riot Games said so" they aren't willing to hear the community (because history says otherwise). Using your kind of logic silences people with a valid argument without contributing to discussion.

Kei143Mar 2, 20171 votes

personally, I don't think SSNunu should be punished.

OP thinks otherwise and is in favor of Riot's ban, saying that the punishment is just.

I don't think I'm silencing anyone in this post. He was beating the horse cos SSNunu was banned already, he just wanted to voice that SSNunu deserved it.

TheFoxLordMar 2, 20172 votes

I didn't say anything about OP or anything about your side of thought. I said to not write off an argument based off Riot's decision. They've been very deliberate in listening and responding to player feedback since their inception.

As in, there is no such thing as beating a dead horse with this company. We complained (meme-d) about their lack of sandbox/funny-skins/decent game-UI/solo queue to death, and thus they responded (it takes some time, but they listen).

The decision to roll back the ban shows that the community is certainly not beating a dead horse but communicating their displeasure for Riot's decision effectively. Telling people that they're beating a dead horse is the same as telling them that their entire conversation has no meaning: it silences people.

So, all I'm saying with this pointless word diarrhea is: Trust in Riot, all conversation has meaning and impact in this community.

Kei143Mar 2, 20171 votes

then .. can i get a proper beating the dead horse meme?

Whether they are for / against SSNunu, its so tiring seeing these SSNunu posts, especially they are so late to the news.

I guess gameplay boards experienced this with "bring back solo queue" posts from back then.

Maximum MordeMar 1, 20176 votes

So what? His goal is to win, he plays to win, he wins more than he loses. It isn't trolling because of the above, simple as that.

AeroWaffleMar 1, 20175 votes

By that logic, if a high plat player took it on themselves to play some bronze games by following around their own jungler and stealing their CS, but still win doing so (since the more skilled player got more farmed), then that wouldn't be negative behavior either.

Maximum MordeMar 1, 20172 votes

Intent matters. Why were they in bronze? If they got there by throwing intentionally, well there's your negative behavior. If they are on a new account, just got unlucky in placements and are trying to climb, well there is no negative intent there and it is neutral behavior.

AeroWaffleMar 1, 20175 votes

I don't really see it as neutral behavior to follow around your jungler and take all their CS without their say-so.

I think the primary argument here is that you think the ends justifies the means, I don't.

Maximum MordeMar 1, 20171 votes

Yep, pretty much. When it comes to solo/duo it's the wild west as far as I'm concerned. In organized team queue, it's a different story.

MorticianjohnMar 2, 20171 votes

In ranked games winning should be the only thing that matters. The end always justifies the means. Of course that doesn't mean you should be toxic, talk trash etc... but if you have a strat that works even if your team objects you should still run that strat.