Should INTing be a permanent suspension on first offense?
I am talking obvious INTing like walking down lane to die.
I think it should be permanent suspension simply because of the fact they know what they are doing when they do it. They are intentionally trying to ruin the game for other people.
Imperial Pandaa3 votesSure, and lets also make flaming an immediate 14 day ban and hate speech perm too. After all, the fact that they know what they are doing when the do it.
/s
CURSEÐ REVENANT1 votes[{quoted}](name=Imperial Pandaa,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=E0Q6L60v,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2018-06-19T00:13:27.475+0000)
Sure, and lets also make flaming an immediate 14 day ban and hate speech perm too. After all, the fact that they know what they are doing when the do it.
/s
I am fine with it.
ModThe Djinn3 votesPersonally I'm all for giving everyone one chance, which is what the current system does. Riot does have a different community standard than some other online games, and I think giving people that one firm warning is appropriate in most circumstances, including intentional feeding.
Jamaree1 votesNah, too harsh, and way too easy for a really really bad game to be classified as such, which does happen. I think 3 to 4 games should be instant though, none of this ten game plus bs.
CURSEÐ REVENANT1 votesNah, too harsh, and way too easy for a really really bad game to be classified as such, which does happen. I think 3 to 4 games should be instant though, none of this ten game plus bs.
It is easy to tell the difference between INTing and a bad game. Running from spawn to turret is pretty obvious.
Umbral Regent1 votesIt is easy to tell the difference between INTing and a bad game. Running from spawn to turret is pretty obvious.
It's not easy, unless you're using that aforementioned "run it down mid" scenario. And the issue is, you can't just punish obvious intentional feeding with a permaban. You have to punish all intentional feeding cases the same way - obvious or no.
And another issue is: Permaban from the gate means no room to reform. Nobody likes intentional feeders, but they still should get at least one chance to straighten out. You may not like the thought - and I know I particularly don't care for it - but Riot believes in at least one shot at reform.
Jamaree1 votes[{quoted}](name= CURSEÐ REVENANT,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=E0Q6L60v,comment-id=00000000,timestamp=2018-06-19T00:29:50.733+0000)
It is easy to tell the difference between INTing and a bad game. Running from spawn to turret is pretty obvious.
You have a Rammis with mobi boots first item but the whole team is losing already, he is 0/6/X and depending who you ask, you will get two different answers.
Karunamon2 votesI've yet to see a bogus inting punishment handed out.
At the same time, I've seen many unpunished inters. And not in the "hurr this guy sucked this game so he must be inting" way, more like the "I'm gonna buy 6 tears and run down mid" types.
Jamaree1 votesI've yet to see a bogus inting punishment handed out.
At the same time, I've seen many unpunished inters. And not in the "hurr this guy sucked this game so he must be inting" way, more like the "I'm gonna buy 6 tears and run down mid" types.
I haven’t, I very rarely see actual inters, show me.
Karunamon1 votesUsually linked here.
I've had only 2, maybe 3 in my entire time playing. The last one I knew about was still playing a month after I reported him before I lost my cookies on op.gg and forgot what his name was.
They're not super common, but they're not handled very quickly either. I mean, 6 tears and a string of deaths (and in the last guy's case, declaring his intentions in chat) is pretty damning.