Lower Priority Queue (5)

To whomever this may concern,

I was in a game of ARAm but I had a quick chore to do at home during game play. I was gone for may 7 min the max which meant I would be receiving a warning due to inactivity and eventually be disconnected from the game. After finishing up my chore I came back and reconnected back to the game. Unfortunately, once I entered the game, the enemy was in control of the game due to my absence. 4 against 5 is always a disadvantage. However, as the game went on we eventually caught up and ended up winning the game. Meaning, I helped in winning the game when clearly they had the chance to win way before. So basically it was redemption for me. Wouldn't it be only right for the player that went AFK and actually came back to help win the game, not be placed in the lower priority queue . I understand that sometimes that may not be the case and they still lose. Well then you place them in the lower priority queue as mentioned because it still gave the other players a negative experience. But see, if a player goes AFK for a moment and comes back and manages to help win the game, then how is that a negative experience? The other players will be irritated for the AFK but at the end delighted for still winning the game. And to be delighted means the opposite of a negative experience.

Thank you for your time for those who read my post. Any help will be great to get this up to the top dudes that run League of Legends. I firmly believe this situation is understandable and be given a compromise .

FYI: Link is the result of the game. I play kennen in this Match. Went AFK at the beginning of the match.