The new system being awful just ban the people cursing at those intentional feeders (Dunkey's example) but the intentional feeders or trolls would never ever been punished, how's Rito dealing with that?. Tribunal was better handling that kind of situations.
BeatzBoyFTW2 votesBruh.......Dunkey DID received chat restriction multiple times. He's already at a point where his next strike is a temporary ban.
Matthias91191 votesThey always have banned intentional feeders. They're not psychic and can't ban people before they do it, and historically these have required manual review unless they came up in Tribunal.
They LITERALLY just rolled out automatic intentional feeding detection. Which they've been talking about for at least a year -- better late than never, I guess.
Doctor Jarvis1 votesThe problem is that people report for "feeding" ALL THE GODDAMN TIME because its just a toxic reaction to a bad player, and you can't get banned for "being bad". Rito has to use a lot of manpower investigating whether it was intentional feeding or not (which is made harder if the feeder didn't say "Im gonna start feeding on purpose now)
Romans VI XXIII1 votesits pretty obvious when they have 2 or 3 games where they are 0/20/0. And Riot keeps all those match records, so no it would not take any effort at all to look into this. A tribunal can easily do it. If you get reported for Intentionally feeding of few times, then your past X games get sent to the tribunal, if they agree that you intentionally fed then you get suspensions or if its repeated banned.
