I've seen this a lot and, as a Moderator on another site myself, I've gotten my fair share of these to which we have a ZERO tolerance policy on it. What needs to happen is either have people moderate in-game, watch games, or have the people at Riot deal with the Tribunal cases. The problem with that, however, is that while moderators are volunteers, they'd be upheld to certain standards and if they feed, die, troll, or make bad plays, it could be terrible which it would be better if they only could moderate while spectating, taking a screenshot of chat should a player start raging, flaming, or some such. They shouldn't be given any special titles, just chosen by Riot who are active in the game and reporting. Would prevent all that possible backlash.
Okay so I said Zero Tolerance is a way to deal with this problem, I didn't actually give my opinion as to if I'd vote yes on such a policy. I will reserve my opinion for right now.
I believe if Riot implements something where they Mod games or forum ( a player-mod type thing ) that the persons doing so should remain faceless...They should'n't have a badge or such on display. I can understand where people want to have actions taken to be transparent ( to Some extent ) , what I was thinking is if a pm takes an action then has to explain it to whomever Then maybe they could do it under a different name: IE-- PM 123.
Does that make since ? Your right about such players being held to a different standard and I'd imagine some rage at them also just because they could take action. If they are volunteers then I don't feel like they should have to take flack for being such.