EUW > NA - French > All

Oswiz·Apr 9, 2015·1 votes·264 views

ddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddddd

i troll u.

8 Comments

SEKAIApr 9, 20151 votes

So EUW is only larger than NA minus French?

That's a bit small don't you think?

i troll u.

Romans VI XXIIIApr 9, 20151 votes

well based on history

NA > EUE > EUW > All

If you know what I mean.

SEKAIApr 9, 20151 votes

If it's based on History, NA wouldn't be at the top.

Romans VI XXIIIApr 9, 20151 votes

Obviously you don't "know what I mean"

and yes based on history NA is on top. Just think about it for a min and you might get it.

If not ill help you out. WWI, WWII, nuff said.

SEKAIApr 9, 20151 votes

Idk US pretty much did nothing in WW1 and lost a naval base to a side league player in WW2, which responded by tossing 2 nuclear bombs on civilian towns, with a few things else but mostly that's pretty much it.

I don't mind where you would put it, but saying in history it's top is imo just not right.

Romans VI XXIIIApr 10, 20151 votes

lol, obviously you don't know your history.

WWI, since we have a democracy we can not enter into a war unless the senate and house vote on it, and at the time our people (the citizens) did not want to get into a war. Then Germany started shooting down our supply ships (stupid idea), thus we entered the war, and frankly if it wasn't for us entering the war no one would have stopped Germany. When we entered the war all that was left was Britain and Russia, both LOSING terribly.

WWII, we where currently in diplomatic discussions with Japan, cause again we did not want to enter into a war. Then Japan decided to do a surprise attack on Pearl Harbor. Yes it was a tragic defeat on our part, but thank God our air craft carriers where on a practice mission that week. SO again. we didn't want to enter into a war, but where practically forced. And again, when we entered the war China was losing VERY fast to Japan, All that was left in Europe was Britain, and it was getting the SHIT bombed out of it, and every other country at the time was a 3rd world country and would have been nothing for Germany to take. As for the bombs on Japan, yes they where tragic. But our military dropped propaganda for WEEKS on both cities warning them that we are going to destroy the entire city, and to get out while they still could. Allas, at the time such power was not believe able so they didn't heed our warning, and many, many civilians lost there lives. But in the end it saved many other lives, cause the war with Japan would have gone on for many more years.

So lets recap, WWI every one is losing to Germany (and a few other of their allies), US enters war due to Germany being stupid, and US Wins. 1 US 0 World. WWI evey one is losing to Germany and Japan, US enters due to the back stabbing of Japan, Japan and Germany lose. 2 US 0 World.

So yes I believe I can say that the US > ALL based on History. I also have no problem if you where to say YOUR COUNTRY > ALL. Cause that means you love your country, and I respect that. I love my country and I believe it is the greatest!!

SEKAIApr 10, 20151 votes

If you wish to teach me history, at least tell me actual history rather than stories. What's their differences you might ask. Story is traditionally singular perspective and history is the opposite.

In the age where people are learning to tell stories as realistic as possible, it's meaningless to turn world history into some old crappy story that is clearly out of date. Your story is 1 sided, with US as the protagonist, remember history is not CoD's singleplayer campaign.

US never won any war, just like hyenas don't win actual fights, they just arrive to claim the bones. There is nothing wrong with that, what's wrong is turning that into some great cause or some twisted tales about triumphing victory.

History has also told us, no one wins wars. That is why intelligent countries don't wage wars or start invasions lightheartedly these days, well except for that one country I guess, anyways. So when you say "XXX is the best because he wins wars", the statement is both wrong and void.

I can understand when one is being patriotic, and I can support it, but being ignorant is a different story here. Just please don't ever cross the line and become the latter.

Also dropping nuclear bombs not 1 but 2 in CIVILIAN towns is never, ever, a thing to do. Not to mention there was a thing called Bat Bombs sitting in development during WW2, powerful or not, it at least was a more humane way of cleaning up stuff since it at least don't plague the land or deform future generations. But it was not used in the end. Why? I will let you figure it out.

I will never ever say that a country is #1 overall, even if it's my home country because I am not stupid enough to live in re-written histories or past glories if there is any. And I am very glad about the fact my country is not among the military powerhouses dominating the world through missiles and economical monopoly.

Pros and cons, times and eras, there is no best country. If there really is one out there, it at least won't be US, nor is it gonna be China, or other "strong" country right now.

Romans VI XXIIIApr 9, 20151 votes

So let me get this right. EUW is GREATER than NA MINUS French. But the only problem is France isn't in NA, thus it can't be "MINUS French". unless you are indeed talking about all the French players that live in NA. But even if that is the case, I don't know of many French players that are in the NA LCS, thus I can not agree that "EUW > NA - French > All". Because the equation itself does not make sense. Maybe you should re-write your equation to "NA + France > EUW - France > All"