Here's a Solution for a Tribunal

Snake Griffinn·4/23/2015, 7:16:09 AM·0 votes·232 views

The problem is they get millions of reports and only a fraction of the resources to review them.

I say give each LoL user one "complaint ticket" every 10 games. They can then spend a ticket to report another player after a match. Since they can report one person every 10 games at most, they will be selective about who they report.

If their report is a frivolous complaint then they move to the "untrusted" teir and only get a ticket every 25 games. If they make legit complaints they can become "junior tribunal members" or something and get a ticket every game or something.

A system like this could ensure that there are far less complaints they have to review overall, and among the ones they do get will have a low percentage of BS complaints.

3 Comments

Jubbinaut4/23/2015, 7:49:43 AM2 votes

The problem with this is pretty obvious: What happens if you run into a player who genuinely deserves a report? Do you use your 1 report (and risk being unable to report a player who deserves it as much or more in a later game), or do you save it (and let that player go unreported)?

Regardless of your personal answer, it begs a further question - why should players ever have to wonder about that?

The systems they have in place ensure that they don't even need to review every report. Rather, they only need to pay attention to cases, built when (validly) reported games against a player break a certain threshold. And while basically every player receives reports periodically, a far smaller percentage actually have cases.

Ada Wong4/23/2015, 8:06:25 AM2 votes

The problem is players are more toxic than you think, and often I file more than 10 Reports a day because of toxicity, but I do agree players abuse the reporting system, in some games today where I was forced to play Jungle they rage because they Feed massively before even level 6 our mid laner gives up first blood, and feeds really hard totally unskilled, then they have the nerve to yell Troll because as a jungler its my decision on if a gank can actually be successful or not, my call was not to gank because they already fed, but rather group before the team feeds a lot more, and players get extremely hateful and toxic and file false reports for "Verbal Abuse" like honestly this is a problem because with the high report rate I am sure I will be restricted within this week very likely.

What Riot needs to do is get rid of the automated system and go to Manual Reviews if a player requests it and not only look at the player who was playing but take action against false reports. Being reported for verbal abuse simply because I can't gank a players lane and they want to argue in chat because I can't carry players who are bad. ** I still say we need "Role Selection" for Solo Q in ranked/draft matches it would help prevent a lot of toxicity.** Because one of the main problems leading to toxicity players who are not "Jungle Mains" or play differently than most in certain elo players rage when things go bad or game-play needs to be done differently, ( I would not have been reported in one of my games) if I would have not been playing jungle.

I also would not have had a toxic experience in two other games I got reported in as well if we had a role selection system because players wouldn't have been arguing about roles.

You are right there needs to be changes, and players who abuse the report system should be punished themselves, but there should be no limit to the number of reports filed, even in DOTA 2, a single game I run into toxic players abusing the report system there too, I get chat restricted for no reason there as well sometimes after one game of being reported while being called hateful things over the mic by others, and I report them next game if I am unlucky to get similar players I can't report them, and I don't file false reports unless there is actual abuse.

Sometimes in DOTA 2, I was lucky enough just like League to get players who were respectful, but honestly Solo Q over there is just as bad, and even worse if you get a restriction.

Snake Griffinn4/23/2015, 8:58:14 AM1 votes

You would decide if it's worth it or not. See who else on your team wants to spend a point. If it's a legitimate complaint someone will do it because they would get moved into a more trusted tier and get more tickets. And honestly I prefer only being able to report 1 out of 10 problem people knowing that that 1 is going to be reviewed and punished by a human being. That's better than reporting every game and knowing nothing will happen.

Toxicity is bad. I hate it. But you can always mute. There are much worse things than people losing their temper. I'm in ELO hell. In my last 10 games 7 of them had full blown trolls. One was a duo that took smite so we had 3 junglers. Another troll today just followed me around the whole game literally just followed me and kept typing "ruff ruff doggie" (I was warwick). It's total anarchy. Another picked Teemo last to ADC. Another picked Caitleyn top one game, a Wukong support another, a Janna APC in another, and a Vel'Koz ADC in another. About half of them straight up said they were trolls in the queue chat. This was all TODAY AND YESTERDAY. I swear I am not exaggerating.

EDIT: Literally as I was typing this I was top of a queue and I chose WW jg. The fourth person in the queue chose Udyr and picked smite and said "Okay you get blue I'll get red, okay?"