I'm sure this would create 10k clubs with the tag TSM, but is that really a bad thing if you REAAALLLY wanna have a TSM prefix?
I'd argue that this could be pretty bad. If TSM (the actual team) had a club for themselves and friends (they might, I don't actually know) that'd be a pretty exclusive Club with a lot of hype around it. If everyone can just copy that, how would you ever know if you played with someone from that Club, or if they were just from one of the bajillion other TSM Clubs. Now, imagine you're in that Club and you like the attention it gets you. How would you feel when seeing a TSM tag just isn't special and you don't get your "oh, man you're in the TSM Club?! Cool!"? Not everyone wants that, but I think group recognition is one of the best things about Clubs, and that will only get more true as we add more features.
I'm not really a fan of adding numbers and punctuation to stylize names.
Same. This is why I do agree we'll need to do something in the space. Other games have solved unique naming in some creative ways, and we'll have to take a look to see if there's anything we can do without really wrecking the concept of Club distinctiveness.
you have to increase the player count to more than 50
This is interesting, and we've talked about it quite a bit. We don't want to go too high because pretty quickly you'll have no idea who the various people are. People are really bad at tracking too many relationships, and we don't want Clubs to become large masses of whoever happens to be in there.
That said, there are a lot of cases where larger social groups are really useful. We're playing with some ideas that will hopefully keep Clubs relatively tight groups, but still get the benefits of much larger constructs.
and allow people to search for and join clubs
Still agree! At least in the general sense that we need to make finding Clubs way better than it is now.
Ideally I wanted to create a club with the Tag "Iron". And invite all my friends so we could be Iron x and Iron y. Is this something that will be possible for me in the future?
Depends on a few things. If we find a solution that lets tags feel exclusive and unique but still allows the same character combination, then maybe. However, there's a LOT to consider there, so a) don't know that we'll ever go there and b) if we do, it will be after quite a few other features probably.
We have to balance the needs of players looking to make new Clubs, and those of the players who already have them. For the owner and members of the existing Iron Club, maybe they created it for the same reasons you want to and they really value the exclusivity. They know they are THE Iron Club, not Iron Club #6072. For a lot of people there's a big difference.
I think as a Rioter you might be biased since you got in quick and made a cool club / with a tag
Covering this bit last. While it's true that the Club I rep most was created this way, I've tried to create a number based on tags I thought would be awesome and they were all taken. It sucks. I know exactly what you're talking about :(.
Can't promise anything other than we'll give it some thought (and the prefix part, I'll still be passing that on to talk about), but most likely it'll take a back seat to a bunch of the other (cool IMO!) stuff we're working on now.
Keep the feedback coming, it's good to get different perspectives. Even if the answer is often "yeah we'll look into it" or "not much to say right now". Wish I could commit to more this early but it's not fair to you (because we may never deliver) or to my teams (because it puts pressure on them to stick with early ideas even if newer ones are better).
Thanks!