I think you're being a little too defensive yourself to call it patronizing, over a mis-communication. I was in no way attacking you or "patronizing". Now to be on topic...
Visual appearance and lore, you should know by now, aren't always a good indicator of the direction they can take him (see Trundle relaunch).
To reiterate from a similar response I received elsewhere:
"I think if they just removed the fat part of Urgot, I would enjoy him in visual design. There absolutely is no reason a Frankenstein-esque creation has to be fat from built parts. I mean take the novel Frankenstein by Mary Shelley as a straight example. Victor Frankenstein's monster was ugly and human, but in no way was he fat. He was strong, muscular, but terrifying to look at with all the stitches coming together to formulate a human being.
Singed looks in no way close to ugly as Urgot. He has his own trope IMO, being a scary and intimidating man in the face, but still aesthetically pleasing to look at throughout his mechanical body (though still needs a VU)."
Majority of people don't choose champions like Singed and Hecarim (opposed to Urgot) strictly for their lore alone. They choose them because their kits/appearance are unique/appealing (note I said appealing). Urgot has none of these good qualities in his current form.
