solo que ranked democracy

Ardie1·1/8/2015, 2:24:32 PM·2 votes·949 views
http://www.reddit.com/r/leagueoflegends/comments/2rqt7p/solo_que_draft_pick_doomed_to_failed_in_the/

Please bare in mind this is not really considering ranked team draft where you can communicate prior to the game. when people pick their bans they are considering which team comps they can play well in and banning the ones that counter them. bear in mind you have just 1 min to discuss this with your team, and I am almost always going into games with bad runes when joining solo que. the total number of comps a team can play together is limited by which champions are known by the players individually. if there is democracy in which ones they are choosing then all have a say and so there is a smaller subset left to choose from making it easier to pick. so why not have a system where all 5 players vote for each of the bans, and the most common one will be the first ban. this way the team is automatically communicating which champs they want banned without having to explain themselves etc. all have a say this way so that more of the unfavorable teamcomps have been banned out.

6 Comments

iamthegoatofwar1/8/2015, 9:41:27 PM1 votes

I think every one should just get a ban.

MaidenX1/9/2015, 6:10:27 AM1 votes

U know wot it will sometimes cause 0 bans in situations where they just don't have a shared mind

Ragingfangs1/10/2015, 1:56:22 AM1 votes

No. Bans should be communicated by the team and the random team captain has the last say. This is a monarchy damnit the one given ritos mandate of heavean get to rule over all the ones deemed as peasants by rito

Ardie1/10/2015, 6:18:22 PM1 votes

just remembered that this actually helps when people dont know what to ban and the team ends up not banning, because its more likely that at least one person will vote for a ban