Why change Urgot's lore?

Jaclyn Fox··5 votes·994 views

I was reading up on the new Urgot changes, and one thing really kind of bugged me about them. It says that he was betrayed by Swain and enslaved in Zaun's mines. What happened to getting cut in half by Garen? Why change his lore? His backstory is great; It is in depth, fits with the setting of the game, and gives a tells a great story. His new backstory (based on the paragraph on the champion reveal page) is he was betrayed by swain, enslaved, then augmented his body with machinery so he can get revenge and destroy Zaun. His new backstory just sounds overly generic. I can understand having to change characters from time to time to breathe new life into the game, but why did you have to change a really good backstory when the design of the character isn't so radically different that it needs to be done? If you look at his new design, he still looks like he's on life support and the machines are mobility aides. He still looks like he very well could have been cut in half and piecemealed back together. I just feel like his backstory didn't need to be changed, and the new one is a change for the worse.

10 Comments

GreenLore7 votes

You say his new backstory sounds generic,but his old one,where he was cut down by the hero and returns for revenge wasn't?

Also we really don't know the details yet,so I'd advise to wait for the full story before judging about his new lore.

Variks the Loyal3 votes

One reason is modernization; this new version fits better, considering Zaun can't be 'allied' with Noxus because Zaun and Piltover are technically the same city.

Another reason is because Darius is being played up as Garen's main rival; we don't need two people rearing for Garen's head. Meanwhile, Swain is being built up as Noxus' 'main villain', with both Sion, Kled, and now Urgot having distasteful feelings towards him.

Chembaron Yamada4 votes

Would like to add: The revived Noxian soldier is already represented with Sion pretty well. I am glad that they decided to not make him undead, but a living person with life support. He feels more distinct from Sion now.

Wrathof3003 votes

Also to add onto this, if he were able to be revived with chemtech and what not, it would have taken away from the development we made with recent Zaun update where people were desperately cutting off their limbs and replacing them to avoid being poisoned further all in fail. Orianna completely losing herself when she was basically reborn as a robot, Viktor desperately trying to augment the people's brains before they died so that he would have a chance of saving them, Urgot being able to be reborn with almost no repercussions would have ruined the whole setting.

Chembaron Yamada3 votes

Really good point and another addition: He is preaching his ideal of "surviving". "There are no leaders, just survivors."

Being resurrected would be kinda weird in that context. Because at least in my opinion, being resurrected =/= surviving.

Takeuchi 171 votes

Another reason is because Darius is being played up as Garen's main rival; we don't need two people rearing for Garen's head

I disagree with that. whats wrong with having multiple nemesis or multiple rivals. if its war you're bound to make plenty enemies, not just make an enemy out of only one person

I Like Teemo2 votes

because now he's a walking sentry gun and needs more reason to seem like he was made for a purpous

Korios1 votes

He could still be the guy that shot Jarvan with an arrow.

Korios1 votes

In his new lore.

GreenLore1 votes

I really doubt that given how massive Urgot is. He must have been huge even before he became a cyborg.

More from Story, Art, & Sound