League Community

thevlaovicjunior··1 votes·466 views

So...I suggest you guys and gals in riot games fix your community and try to disable accounts who have no idea of the basics of the game There are people who would like to enjoy League but simply cant because 70% of players are toxic unexpirienced and simply not for the game and it ruins the whole point of games...to have fun and relax not to get nervous brakedowns My point is take down the servers with toxic and bad players or come up with some system that will truly punish those kind of players I played 3 games today and i cant play anymore....because of your SHIT COMMUNITY Thank you for listening and bye...enjoy your filthy money game

11 Comments

zenkai45112 votes

Cya

The Cream Reaper2 votes

[vlad-salute]

MachstDuBierHase1 votes

Even though OP is using faul language and is cleary frustrated over his experience, he has a valid point. Toxicity does not rise from no where - it has an origin.

The origin are bad players, may it be inting, feeding, trolling or general lack of gameawareness. It has been like this for years and Riot Games did nothing to adress that issue nor refine matchmaking criteria.

Thus, the community grows "toxic"

RallerenP3 votes

Sure toxic players has a cause, but that doesn't mean they are right.

There is also a reason Kim Jong Un is leader of NK, but that doesn't mean he is right.

Toxicity stems from a lack of self-control. Nothing else. If you don't have that self-control, you shouldn't play League.

MachstDuBierHase1 votes

{quoted}

Sure toxic players has a cause, but that doesn't mean they are right.

There is also a reason Kim Jong Un is leader of NK, but that doesn't mean he is right.

Not saying that toxic players are right nor that it is okay to insult someone, I'm merely saying that the reason why has little merit for the Riot or the Employees in Player Behaviour.

Look at it like a hole in a barrel you try to fill by keep fueling it up. The hole is still there no matter how many liquid you pour in.

Toxicity stems from a lack of self-control. Nothing else. If you don't have that self-control, you shouldn't play League.

I disagree, if you lack the basics and common sense to play - you shouldnt play League. Nobody has a problem with first timers or beginners, but with intentionally disruptive and negative people.

If you see it in a different light, you're part of the problem - not the solution

Jo0o1 votes

How the fuck do you enforce this?

Ban everybody in Bronze (which, by the way, is 21% of the community), and now all the Silvers are the new Bronzies. Ban them, now the Golds are the new Bronzies. Who decides which player is "good enough" to be worthy of holding a League account?

You can read anybody's op.gg page and decide that they lack the basic skills of the game. You, for instance, only managed 350 cs across the 87 minutes in those three games you played today, for a total of less than 4.5 cs per minute in lane. You blame your team, but those are really bad numbers, and even playing from behind you should have done better. Does this make you one of the people that should have their account deactivated for the good of the community?

It's a fucking game. People are going to lose 50% of the games they play. They're going to lose those games because, at some point in the game, they're going to fail to accomplish a goal that they should have succeeded in. That doesn't make them unworthy of playing the game, because across any skill level, it's perfectly natural to lose.

MachstDuBierHase1 votes

{quoted}

How the fuck do you enforce this?

Ban everybody in Bronze (which, by the way, is 21% of the community), and now all the Silvers are the new Bronzies. Ban them, now the Golds are the new Bronzies. Who decides which player is "good enough" to be worthy of holding a League account?

You can read anybody's op.gg page and decide that they lack the basic skills of the game. You, for instance, only managed 350 cs across the 87 minutes in those three games you played today, for a total of less than 4.5 cs per minute in lane. You blame your team, but those are really bad numbers, and even playing from behind you should have done better. Does this make you one of the people that should have their account deactivated for the good of the community?

Technically, this could have any number of reasons why he has low CS (no supp; playing carefully, pushing hard, babysits...) and how stats are made up, so it is technically impossible just by going through the stats. The last game I played was as MF vs Corki/Irellia with a not so smart Karma support.. We lost in the end bc common sense was lost on our Lux, who btw surrenderspammed bc she inted the sh*t out of her lane. Surrenderspamming is yet not punishable nor is there a function in place that blocks you from /ff twice in a row..

It's a fucking game. People are going to lose 50% of the games they play. They're going to lose those games because, at some point in the game, they're going to fail to accomplish a goal that they should have succeeded in. That doesn't make them unworthy of playing the game, because across any skill level, it's perfectly natural to lose.

Easy enough by applying a moderated version of the matchmaking that puts the total games played into account while matching you with others. This way, not only the MMR is effective but also the games won. An 37/100 Win/Games Account might have an higher MMR then a 220/800 Win/Games, yet they are matched together due to MMR or premade groups.

Thus why I often ask for a no-pre filtering system and a 25/50/75/100/150/250/300/500 - Games Played/Win Filter, but to no vail. Rito claims it is in place, but the total games played was visible in the old client after a match and spoke for itself - Now it aint so chew on that thought for a moment

Jo0o1 votes

Does a higher number of games won make you a better player or a worse player?

I've got no fear of a person with 1000 games won in Silver, because after a thousand wins they still haven't climbed out of Silver.

MachstDuBierHase1 votes

{quoted}

Does a higher number of games won make you a better player or a worse player? Neither, but it gives you more experience on how the game or basics work.

I've got no fear of a person with 1000 games won in Silver, because after a thousand wins they still haven't climbed out of Silver.

you just made my point for me then ;)

Jo0o1 votes

I'm not entirely sure what point I made for you.

MachstDuBierHase1 votes

{quoted}

I'm not entirely sure what point I made for you.

"I've got no fear of a person with 1000 games won in Silver, because after a thousand wins they still haven't climbed out of Silver." MMR

More from Player Behavior