just realized something
if someone ints due to a bad pick, doesn't that make the pick look worse than it is in the statistics?
if someone ints due to a bad pick, doesn't that make the pick look worse than it is in the statistics?
the number of games people int just because of a pick is probably statistically irrelevant considering there are millions of games a day.
Oxygen will kill you, better breathe in oxygen daily to survive...... Numbers mattered here 99% O2 will kill you ,30% won't
you're 1 user experiencing 1 game of the thousands of games daily per hero/champ most are not trolled(maybe 3% difference) Don't believe your personal experience to be that of the many
AA has a lower win rate because his kit is outclassed by other champs... darius
aa has a 48% win rate, with your "evidence" he'd have a 58% win rate now that is folly, at best he has a 51% win rate as even the highest win rate cap at 56/57 rarely going above that
with a low end of 40% aa is in a good spot
http://champion.gg/statistics/#?sortBy=general.winPercent&order=ascend
zzzz
Mass Data over specific instance is where data comes from
Every hero inside league of legends has moments that you listed, those are factored into the stats
Sure a hero can be a tad lower or higher based off the % trolls/afk in their games, but a tad not more than 3%
[slayer-pantheon-thumbs]