Skip to content

Really Rito?! A 14 Day Suspension

JoseJMadrid··1 votes·1,627 views

This gets me a 14 day suspension. Some of these games my team trolled me by taking my role, or they were being negative and gave up on the game, yet I'm the one being punished, great reporting system ggwp rito.

Game 1 JoseJMadrid: gtfo JoseJMadrid: you didnt even call a role JoseJMadrid: you just locked JoseJMadrid: nope JoseJMadrid: nope JoseJMadrid: get your friend out of here zed JoseJMadrid: report gnar pls JoseJMadrid: fuck JoseJMadrid: so lucky no mana JoseJMadrid: gg JoseJMadrid: i'm afk bye JoseJMadrid: really JoseJMadrid: qoq JoseJMadrid: wow JoseJMadrid: this gnar JoseJMadrid: pls report gnar JoseJMadrid: fuck naut JoseJMadrid: pathetic JoseJMadrid: next time call a role JoseJMadrid: so fucking stupid JoseJMadrid: brb JoseJMadrid: git gud JoseJMadrid: okay JoseJMadrid: wtf JoseJMadrid: pls JoseJMadrid: idk why 2 people said no to the surr JoseJMadrid: mustve been zed and his %%% friend gnar JoseJMadrid: surprise JoseJMadrid: gnar and his friend zed dont want to JoseJMadrid: pls JoseJMadrid: OMFG JoseJMadrid: thank god JoseJMadrid: pls finish Game 2 JoseJMadrid: lol jax sup JoseJMadrid: WELCOME TO SEASON 7 BOIS JoseJMadrid: so desperate JoseJMadrid: see ya JoseJMadrid: so gay JoseJMadrid: and i had ignite JoseJMadrid: so boosted JoseJMadrid: WTF JoseJMadrid: scripts JoseJMadrid: WTF ARE YALL DOING JoseJMadrid: OMFG JoseJMadrid: TRASH TEAM JoseJMadrid: GG JoseJMadrid: open mid JoseJMadrid: open top JoseJMadrid: says the one who tried to fight him JoseJMadrid: NICE TY JoseJMadrid: Nice mia JoseJMadrid: no wtf JoseJMadrid: he didnt call mia JoseJMadrid: gtfo JoseJMadrid: nah JoseJMadrid: i dont want to help you JoseJMadrid: still got em JoseJMadrid: lol; JoseJMadrid: nice try tho JoseJMadrid: it was cute JoseJMadrid: who? JoseJMadrid: you're fucking stupid JoseJMadrid: i got bot JoseJMadrid: team cant defend JoseJMadrid: gg Game 3 JoseJMadrid: i have not stop playing kat JoseJMadrid: dont surrender JoseJMadrid: i'm doing great JoseJMadrid: stop JoseJMadrid: just because you did bad JoseJMadrid: doesnt mean we all have to surrender JoseJMadrid: no JoseJMadrid: report blitz pls JoseJMadrid: he's toxic and negative JoseJMadrid: lol JoseJMadrid: says the crybaby JoseJMadrid: report blitz pls JoseJMadrid: gg JoseJMadrid: it's people like blitz that ruins the game for everyone JoseJMadrid: WHO CARES JoseJMadrid: YOU'RE NEGATIVITY IS AFFECTING EVERYONE JoseJMadrid: can't wait to report you JoseJMadrid: so you can get banned JoseJMadrid: you're griefin JoseJMadrid: thats an actual reportable offence JoseJMadrid: report blitz

72 Comments

Kei14310 votes

ya .. this chat log berates others, it blames others, there is hate speech, and threatening to AFK.

What else did you expect? Other's will get punished in their own time when they have hit their punishment threshhold. You focus on your toxicity.

Next punishment is a permaban, no matter how small & mild your negativity is.

Great Muta1 votes

Other's will get punished in their own time when they have hit their punishment threshhold.

We don't know that. Depends on way too many factors and they are likely to keep getting away with.

I reported over 20 people this week and no notifications for punishments were given.

MagicFlyingLlama5 votes

Sounds like you are A: a troll, or B: report anyone who makes you feel insecure, in which case, no, they wont get punished. Get a life, get a grip.

Kei1434 votes

maybe your report weight is just so low that it doesn't mean much anymore.

Great Muta1 votes

Could be but they are all legit reports.

BladeSteel5 votes

except only the last people who reported them get the notice, not everyone who reported them.

OnlyYouCanHearMe4 votes

[{quoted}](name=Great Muta,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=sZ9l9u8j,comment-id=00010000,timestamp=2016-12-04T20:46:22.536+0000) I reported over 20 people this week and no notifications for punishments were given.

If you send in too many reports, it can actually make your reports carry less weight. You also only see the notification if your report is the last one that triggers the punishment. For example, if it takes 10 reports to get a chat restriction, only the 10th player will see the pop-up. Players 1-9 won't ever see it.

Great Muta1 votes

They are legit reports, there's just a lot of people being nasty and since no one ever gets punished, people don't care or think the system doesn't work.

Alpha Samsuni5 votes

only get notification if your report triggered the ban. Every other report before that sort of "flags" the person.

Alpha Samsuni4 votes

only get notification if your report triggered the ban. Every other report before that sort of "flags" the person.

Scary Door5 votes

{quoted}

This gets me a 14 day suspension. Some of these games my team trolled me by taking my role, or they were being negative and gave up on the game, yet I'm the one being punished, great reporting system ggwp rito.

Game 1 JoseJMadrid: gtfo JoseJMadrid: you didnt even call a role JoseJMadrid: you just locked JoseJMadrid: nope JoseJMadrid: nope JoseJMadrid: get your friend out of here zed JoseJMadrid: report gnar pls JoseJMadrid: fuck JoseJMadrid: so lucky no mana JoseJMadrid: gg JoseJMadrid: i'm afk bye

Pretty much that was all I needed to read to know that you earned this suspension.

I know for sure I wouldn't want to play with you based solely on the quoted text, nevermind the rest of it which is just more toxic garbage.

Learn some self control.

Great Muta1 votes

Learn some self control.

Little much don't you think?

Scary Door4 votes

[{quoted}](name=Great Muta,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=sZ9l9u8j,comment-id=00060000,timestamp=2016-12-04T23:49:07.100+0000)

Little much don't you think?

Not at all. When you're an adult you have to learn to be in control of your emotions. Imagine if the OP had said even a few of those things at a job. You'd get fired so fast you wouldn't even know what hit you.

Self control is something you are conditioned to learn at a very young age. So, no, it isn't too much to expect people to exercise restraint before making an ass of themselves in front of others.

Shadòw4 votes

see you then in 3 weeks here with your perma ban

Great Muta1 votes

Reported. Cut out this passive aggressive stuff. This is RBSC behavior and is destroying the board.

Shadòw5 votes

i just read your comment below

ahahahhahahaha i've never read so much BS in my life

Great Muta2 votes

Your comment is not following this:

This board is all about fostering a healthy community in which discussions can revolve around player behavior systems, in-game suspensions, or boards moderation. This includes topics on how the systems work, insight into why players were punished, and advice to help players improve moving forward.

Shadòw2 votes

how do you want to tell people to improve that don't even know that their ban was deserved?

you say that Riots system doesn't detect Feeders and only bans flamers?

let me tell you that i know somebody who got a 2 week ban for inting.

some bans just take longer than others as the system is automated and therefore not perfect, but sooner or later everyone will be restricted/banned that deserves one.

Great Muta1 votes

how do you want to tell people to improve that don't even know that their ban was deserved?

I'm pretty sure this isn't the best method:

see you then in 3 weeks here with your perma ban

Maybe you could tell them what's allowed and what's not and give some recommendations like I did:

Unfortunately, Riot is going to punish stuff like "so gay", calling people "toxic" and "negative", asking for reports and some of the other stuff. The automated behavior system picks up on this stuff and tends to punish it.

As you are saying:

some bans just take longer than others as the system is automated and therefore not perfect, but sooner or later everyone will be restricted/banned that deserves one.

The system is not consistent which is causing the problem.

Shadòw6 votes

Riot knows this is a problem and doesn't care

then make a better system that can detect trolls. you think Riot doesn't work on their system? ofc it's way easier to just detect some filtered words in a chat log and that's why flamers are more likely to get banned, but you say it like it's easy af to make a system that can detect players who are actually inting from just bad or laggy players.

i got a friend who just sold all his items and did run it down mid. that was an easy case to detect and he was banned almost instantly after the game. but there are some people who are aware about the weaknesses of the system and die in a way it looks like they actually fought back and did just unlucky die. the system can easily detect cases when people are actually just running straight into the enemy turrets, but when players just int in a way the system can't detect, they won't get banned that fast or not at all.

when you just have a little knowledge of the topic you would know how hard it is to make an automated system that bans only inters but not bad players.

i'm pretty sure Riot is working hard on making a better system there, so stop spreading out BS.

Great Muta1 votes

then make a better system that can detect trolls. you think Riot doesn't work on their system?

Not publicly anyway. There's been no mentions of it for a long time and even when I've asked directly, it's either been ignored or no info has been given.

ofc it's way easier to just detect some filtered words in a chat log and that's why flamers are more likely to get banned, but you say it like it's easy af to make a system that can detect players who are actually inting from just bad or laggy players.

You could tell what happened if you watched the games, but Riot doesn't have the time or money for that.

when you just have a little knowledge of the topic you would know how hard it is to make an automated system that bans only inters but not bad players.

I know what they've told us and I know the current system never worked and is never going to work.

i'm pretty sure Riot is working hard on making a better system there, so stop spreading out BS.

Unless they tell us about it, I don't believe they are and I'd have no reason to.

TrulyBland5 votes

They can't really speak about specific improvements that publically, since by now milestones in that area would be the system being able to recognize new patterns. And a PSA á la "We can now detect feeders and trolls if they follow the following patterns: " doesn't sound like a good idea, for obvious reasons. So at best they could announce "Hey, our system is now better than before! We can't explain in detail why, or how, but it is!", which doesn't sound like a good idea for entirely different reasons.

Whether the current system "works" or not only depends on your definition of working. Some feeders/trolls get busted by the current system. It's difficult to assess the percentage of feeders that are caught (especially since we only really notice the "leftovers"), but it's an irrefutable fact that their current system is generally able to catch feeders, as long as they exhibit clear enough patterns that the system recognizes.

Unless they tell us about it, I don't believe they are and I'd have no reason to.

They do, though. Maybe not as publically as they should, but it's mentioned by reds occasionally. All of their automated systems are always maintained and updated. They've said this from the beginning, and to apply your logic: Why should I believe they stopped working on something, unless they tell us about that decision?

Great Muta1 votes

They can't really speak about specific improvements that publically, since by now milestones in that area would be the system being able to recognize new patterns.

Why not? Sell me on this.

And a PSA á la "We can now detect feeders and trolls if they follow the following patterns: " doesn't sound like a good idea, for obvious reasons.

There's only so many ways to skin a cat in League and the trolls are running out of them. If people migrated over to a new tactic, it would make it even easier to spot.

So at best they could announce "Hey, our system is now better than before! We can't explain in detail why, or how, but it is!", which doesn't sound like a good idea for entirely different reasons.

Seems fine to me.

Whether the current system "works" or not only depends on your definition of working.

And by who says it. But I think it's clear a lot of people don't think it is and a system like this needs to be constantly improving itself.

It's difficult to assess the percentage of feeders that are caught (especially since we only really notice the "leftovers"), but it's an irrefutable fact that their current system is generally able to catch feeders, as long as they exhibit clear enough patterns that the system recognizes.

As you've alluded to, we can't assess it.

They do, though. Maybe not as publically as they should, but it's mentioned by reds occasionally.

Show me.

Why should I believe they stopped working on something, unless they tell us about that decision?

Because telling us would make them look really good and would immediately shut up people like myself.

Revelstoke1 votes

{quoted}

They can't really speak about specific improvements that publically, since by now milestones in that area would be the system being able to recognize new patterns. And a PSA á la "We can now detect feeders and trolls if they follow the following patterns: " doesn't sound like a good idea, for obvious reasons. So at best they could announce "Hey, our system is now better than before! We can't explain in detail why, or how, but it is!", which doesn't sound like a good idea for entirely different reasons.

Whether the current system "works" or not only depends on your definition of working. Some feeders/trolls get busted by the current system. It's difficult to assess the percentage of feeders that are caught (especially since we only really notice the "leftovers"), but it's an irrefutable fact that their current system is generally able to catch feeders, as long as they exhibit clear enough patterns that the system recognizes.

They do, though. Maybe not as publically as they should, but it's mentioned by reds occasionally. All of their automated systems are always maintained and updated. They've said this from the beginning, and to apply your logic: Why should I believe they stopped working on something, unless they tell us about that decision?

Please, please... point me at anything in RED or any kind of actual evidence there is a troll detection system in place. Otherwise.. please, please stop spreading rumour and misinformation.

Intentional feeder detection, aka walking down the lane again and again dying to tower I believe is in place.

Trolling.. no, nada, nilch. Anything I have found written anywhere basically says, this is a hard problem, its hard to detect, no we don't have a system currently. This goes back to like 2012 when people started clamouring for it..

I'll find you some of the troll Tahm Kench accounts with 70+ games in a row of 0 kill /10-20 deaths with the player spitting his team mates to their death.

Here's the one I linked over a year ago. http://prnt.sc/96oiu8

AeroWaffle6 votes

I find this pretty hypocritical considering you spend a lot of time insulting people on the boards.

Great Muta1 votes

I rarely insult unless you consider calling people out for being RBSC members, harassing or abusing the voting system as anything but fact.

AeroWaffle6 votes

Yes, I consider your "RBSC" term an insult.

Great Muta1 votes

I would think RBSC'ers would take it with pride, but you are just going to have to deal with it like all of us do with the various things that happen in League.

You can reform from your RBSC ways AeroWaffle, I believe in you.

AeroWaffle6 votes

Oh I'm aware that people have to put up with you on the board. I'm merely pointing out that, if anything, you asking people to be civil on the boards is incredibly hypocritical.

Great Muta1 votes

I think I am pretty civil. We have a problem on this board with people abusing the voting system, harassing others and using passive aggressive behavior to act as judges on punishments and it has to stop. You may not like the way I do it and that's fine, but some people need to reform around here and I'm leading the fight to make sure it happens.

AeroWaffle8 votes

I don't believe you are civil. You generalize groups of players under a single term that you've explained means that they don't think for themselves.

You use this term frequently and it's pretty damn insulting.

Especially when a lot of the users spend a fair bit of time explaining their opinion or why they think Riot has taken the right stance on a particular topic.

It would be like me generalizing you into part of, "the local forum trolls".

Great Muta1 votes

I don't believe you are civil.

Let's debate it then.

You generalize groups of players under a single term that you've explained means that they don't think for themselves.

Multiple people here think there is a group who does just that.

Especially when a lot of the users spend a fair bit of time explaining their opinion or why they think Riot has taken the right stance on a particular topic.

Some do.

Then you get stuff like this which is common and upvoted/supported:

"Cant wait to report you" "So you can get banned"OP gets banned lol rekt

they should of skipped straight to the perma ban.

Logs or gtfo, scrub.

Too lazy, didn't read. You deserved it. End of story.

I think the difference is pretty clear.

It would be like me generalizing you into part of, "the local forum trolls".

This is exactly what is going on here with some of the quotes listed. The problem is that type of behavior is being promoted and this is where myself and the Anti-RBSC forces are coming into play.

AeroWaffle5 votes

Some do.

That's my point. You are insulting a group of people for what individuals have said/done. If I were to do the same thing you're doing right now, I would quote some posts from other "local forum trolls" as proof that all members, which would include yourself, are horrible people that only intend on making people angry.

If you're going to criticize what was posted, criticize the person that posts it. Not a group of people.

Each member of the board is a different person.

Great Muta1 votes

You are insulting a group of people for what individuals have said/done.

There's no insulting here, but the first step in getting rid of the RBSC Thought Police is to identify the RBSC Thought Police and that's what is being done.

If you're going to criticize what was posted, criticize the person that posts it. Not a group of people.

See this is what's happening. It's just the same 20 people, saying and doing the exact same things over and over, in an effort to control this forum, and I ain't having none of it.

Each member of the board is a different person.

All "individuals" are different but when a bunch of them do things in a similar way you got a bad group and that's what is happening here. What we have here are a bunch of "individuals" who just happen to be very Pro-Rito, abuse the downvote system and harass/insult/accuse/troll when they get questioned on it and for clarity purposes, they are known as the RBSC - Rito Butt Slappers Club.

AeroWaffle6 votes

There's no insulting here, but the first step in getting rid of the RBSC Thought Police is to identify the RBSC Thought Police and that's what is being done.

You didn't even finish the sentence before insulting a group of people.

See this is what's happening. It's just the same 20 people, saying and doing the exact same things over and over, in an effort to control this forum, and I ain't having none of it.

So because some amount of players are vocal about a similar opinion that one should keep their civility in game, they should be stopped at all costs?

All M&M's are different but when a bunch of them taste strange, you got a bad group and that's what is happening here. A bunch of "individuals" who just happen to be very Pro-Rito, abuse the downvote system and harass/insult/accuse/troll when they get questioned on it and for clarity purposes, they are known as the RBSC - Rito Butt Slappers Club.

M&M's don't have opinions. You're asking people to not downvote others because they might have the same opinion as other people who already downvoted. And so far, you're doing a majority of the harassing/insulting/trolling from my perspective.

Great Muta1 votes

You didn't even finish the sentence before insulting a group of people

Are you denying the RBSC are trying to manipulate the voting system and are engaging in behavior to keep pro-Rito views the norm around here?

So because some amount of players are vocal about a similar opinion that one should keep their civility in game, they should be stopped at all costs?

There's a right way to do it and a wrong way to do it and stuff like this:

Too lazy, didn't read. You deserved it. End of story.

ain't it.

M&M's don't have opinions. You're asking people to not downvote others because they might have the same opinion as other people who already downvoted. And so far, you're doing a majority of the harassing/insulting/trolling from my perspective.

I'm asking RBSC members to not take advantage of a system whether it helps them or hurts them. When you abuse something, it backfires on you, and it looks like some people are going to learn that the hard way later down the line. The downvotes only help me and verify what I'm saying, so I encourage everyone to keep doing it.

And so far, you're doing a majority of the harassing/insulting/trolling from my perspective.

From my perspective, I'm the breath of fresh air that this board desperately needs. We've let bullying and harassment go on far too long on this forum and people are fed up with it around here. This forum needs me and it's time to take out the trash.

AeroWaffle3 votes

Are you denying the RBSC are trying to manipulate the voting system and are engaging in behavior to keep pro-Rito views the norm around here?

How are people "manipulating" the voting system? Each person can vote once. It represents one person's opinion on the post. People are not messaging each other and saying, "Hey, let's all downvote this post here <link>".

I'm asking RBSC members to not take advantage of a system whether it helps them or hurts them. When you abuse something, it backfires on you, and it looks like some people are going to learn that the hard way later down the line.

From my perspective, I'm the breath of fresh air that this board desperately needs. We've let bullying and harassment go on far too long on this forum and people are fed up with it around here.

From my perspective, you just don't like that more people disagree with certain posts that you feel like shouldn't be disagreed with.

And you're going to have to live with that, because each person is allowed to use their upvote/downvote as they please. Your opinion on how each person should use their vote is just that, an opinion.

BeatzBoyFTW5 votes

Oh, you again. What's your deal with threads like this nowadays.

According to his chat logs, it's already obvious that he was being negative by calling for reports, plain insulting, and the griefing/giving up attitude with his "i'm afk" log. And yet here you are defending him for these kind of actions.

Great Muta1 votes

Oh, you again. What's your deal with threads like this nowadays.

You're going to be seeing me a lot around here until things start changing.

According to his chat logs, it's already obvious that he was being negative by calling for reports, plain insulting, and the griefing/giving up attitude with his "i'm afk" log. And yet here you are defending him for these kind of actions.

I agree that some of the stuff he said would justify the ban under Riot's rules, however, I can also see why he said what he said and I can understand why he thinks that the system is not being consistent on punishments and in some situations not even caring, because everyone is saying this.

Note: Down to the score of 0 in seconds. RBSC's voting abuse is working weekends I guess.

BeatzBoyFTW5 votes

And in what way is talking more crap back solves the problem at all compared to reporting? It literally solves nothing except the desire for someone like OP to see his victim's rage.

the system is not being consistent on punishments

You do know that you commented on a thread about OP rejoicing his "Your report has penalized a player" pop-up box, don't you? That is proof that Riot was actually doing his job (of course, again you stubbornly still think posting that is considered bad), and seeing as how your comments there looks as if you've seen thousands of it & was not being happy about it, it just goes to show that Riot is actually devoted in helping to make League a better place by punishing trolls & feeders. It just takes time & patience for the punishment to proc.

Great Muta1 votes

And in what way is talking more crap back solves the problem at all compared to reporting? It literally solves nothing except the desire for someone like OP to see his victim's rage.

At least you see them get something rather than waiting for that eventual punishment notification that never happens. I'm waiting on 22 right now this week.

You do know that you commented on a thread about OP rejoicing his "Your report has penalized a player" pop-up box, don't you? That is proof that Riot was actually doing his job (of course, again you stubbornly still think posting that is considered bad), and seeing as how your comments there looks as if you've seen thousands of it & was not being happy about it, it just goes to show that Riot is actually devoted in helping to make League a better place by punishing trolls & feeders. It just takes time & patience for the punishment to proc.

The guy is obviously not pleased and is mentioning that an unfair system was not consistent as per usual.

BeatzBoyFTW4 votes

At least you see them get something rather than waiting for that eventual punishment notification that never happens. I'm waiting on 22 right now this week.

Yeah, a useless 5 yo argument like OP's cz he doesn't want the other guy to get the last laugh. And I doubt your "22 reports" were even legit, when Shadow's first comment even deserved a useless report.

The guy is obviously not pleased and is mentioning that an unfair system was not consistent as per usual.

The thread about the "Tq for reporting" pop-up box you commented in & OP's chat logs & punishment for about one three games says otherwise.

Great Muta1 votes

Yeah, a useless 5 yo argument like OP's cz he doesn't want the other guy to get the last laugh. And I doubt your "22 reports" were even legit, when Shadow's first comment even deserved a useless report.

Go ahead and prove they weren't.

I know this games behavior rules as well as you can without being a Riot employee and better yet, myself being a "reformed player" 2 times over, knows exactly what goes on in players minds.

The thread about the "Tq for reporting" pop-up box you commented in & OP's chat logs & punishment for about one three games says otherwise.

English? Got lost at the "tq" part.

BeatzBoyFTW3 votes

Go ahead and prove they weren't.

I know this games behavior rules as well as you can without being a Riot employee and better yet, myself being a "reformed player" 2 times over, knows exactly what goes on in players minds.

All the stuffs you said on that previous pop-up box thread & here that I'm very sure you reported? Welp, have not seen one been removed by Riot yet.

Pretty sure I know about it more than you do. Considering the fact that you mentioned about 22 reports (or days, I'm a tad messed up), I've received my own pop-up box quite recently, meaning that I know how the proper punishment system in certain toxicity/trolling situation better than you do:

http://imgur.com/C8NsCz7 http://imgur.com/bVniRpF

English? Got lost at the "tq" part.

Translated as: Oh shit, he got me. Better take out my "Nazi Grammar" trump card. Guess I win this one.

Great Muta1 votes

All the stuffs you said on that previous pop-up box thread & here that I'm very sure you reported? Welp, have not seen one been removed by Riot yet.

Exactly. And if I'm noticing this, and others are noticing it as well, then we have a problem. And that's what we got here. This is why people are on here everyday wondering why people weren't punished and why people are wondering why they have been punished.

Translated as: Oh shit, he got me. Better take out my "Nazi Grammar" trump card. Guess I win this one.

Huh? I'm still lost at the "tq" thing. I legit have no idea if that is short for something or if it's "ty" misspelled.

BeatzBoyFTW2 votes

Exactly. And if I'm noticing this, and others are noticing it as well, then we have a problem. And that's what we got here. This is why people are on here everyday wondering why people weren't punished and why people are wondering why they have been punished.

This really doesn't answer the fact that that thread & the two pictures I posted were proofs that toxic/troll players were indeed punished. It doesn't take like a second after you reported the guy for him to be instantly punished, assuming he didn't get flagged for toxicity a lot, which explains the frustration in similar threads like this one.

Huh? I'm still lost at the "tq" thing. I legit have no idea if that is short for something or if it's "ty" misspelled.

Sigh...even my 4 year old cousin understands what that short term means.

Tq, Ty. Thank You, Thank Q. Potato, potahto.

Great Muta1 votes

This really doesn't answer the fact that that thread & the two pictures I posted were proofs that toxic/troll players were indeed punished. It doesn't take like a second after you reported the guy for him to be instantly punished, assuming he didn't get flagged for toxicity a lot, which explains the frustration in similar threads like this one.

I don't discount that you had this happen. But I've also had this not happen, frequently as have others here in the forum. So there's an issue here. It's anecdotal evidence and if you could keep a sheet of reports to punishment notifications it would be more helpful.

Sigh...even my 4 year old cousin understands what that short term means.

Been online for 13 years, have talked to people all over the world and have never heard this term. Just say TY or Thank you.

OnlyYouCanHearMe1 votes

I'm not sure if I get lumped into that term or not, but I kinda hope so. You guys are pretty awesome, and I'd feel honored to be one of ya'll! But in all seriousness, whether I am or not, I do find that term to be rather insulting. And whether the rest of the comments in the posts are genuine or not, the term itself tends to make them all look somewhat puerile, and I catch myself not taking them very seriously. It's hard to after they start off with name-calling.

TyrekGoldenspear5 votes

What term are you referring to?

If you mean RBSC, then regardless of whether you get labeled that or not don't accept it. It's a demeaning term on purpose.

What the inventor of the term doesn't get is that none of us think Riot is perfect, but we also aren't going to let misinformation about Riot spread either.

TyrekGoldenspear1 votes

But sure, you can be one of us if you want. ;)

Just pick a good name for us and I'm game lol

More from Player Behavior

More by JoseJMadrid