Boards›Player Behavior

beyond done with riot

khloebear27··2 votes·504 views

khloebear27: damn khloebear27: HAHA UGH khloebear27: the wall miss khloebear27: shut up dude khloebear27: really khloebear27: about to mute u khloebear27: i missed the wall and ur just being toxic khloebear27: IM INT WOW UR 0/2 DUMB SHIT khloebear27: love this a adc with zero kills is talking and 2 deaths khloebear27: wow 4 bot khloebear27: still no help from jg no ping from top khloebear27: chill ? um ur 1/4 hemi khloebear27: i never blamed adc for nothing but ok khloebear27: dont get ur shit twisted ez khloebear27: nah im done honestly khloebear27: dear GOD I DONT FUKING CARE khloebear27: PLAY UR OWN FUKING GAME MY GOD khloebear27: ALL U GUYS DO IS TALK TALK TALK ALL I DO IS POPPY SUP WHY IM LP 90 S5 DERPPPPPPPPP khloebear27: cause there kids

fact that i was being attacked from both teams was dumb puts u in tilt mode over 1 bad game like really to get perma banned for this like wow fact how bad i was getting it from all ends was well beyond wanting to play any more,toxic lvl was insane this game and honestly zero fun i get i had past games but really the adc basically turned ppl against me to get me banned which again doesnt make sense fact games not reviewed is beyond me and punishments not properly given out pick on one person and looking at this text ^^^ vs doing the whole lot... done

15 Comments

AraMoOse7 votes

Well, let me put it to you this way : If you don't think this is a punishable log, then it's probably for the best that you are "done with Riot".

The conversation should have ended after "about to mute you". Then you mute them, then you dont hear from them ever again.

FridgesArePpl24 votes

What is with all the thread lately from people who obviously deserve to be banned complaining about getting banned?

Negativity1 votes

{quoted}

What is with all the thread lately from people who obviously deserve to be banned complaining about getting banned?

Tbh we are losing lots of toxic players who act like they are best players in the game, while they feed and flame their teams.

Oxyrotten2 votes

{quoted}

What is with all the thread lately from people who obviously deserve to be banned complaining about getting banned?

Riot recently overturned a ban for a toxic eCelebrity.

Summoners code sect. 9: Lead by example.

Good job riot.

usul12024 votes

They removed an ID ban. None of his accounts are getting unbanned. They're revamping their ID ban policy and are open to shows of reform.

Oxyrotten2 votes

{quoted}

They removed an ID ban. None of his accounts are getting unbanned. They're revamping their ID ban policy and are open to shows of reform.

Cool.

So they made an exception so that he could play on stream. I am aware of the definition of ID ban so save your breath, the facts are: Tyler1 is toxic. He has consistently proven to be toxic. Tyler1 was allowed to create new accounts to play. Tyler1 was banned again once those accounts were seen on stream. Tyler1 is no longer being banned on sight (of public play/stream).

Riot made an exception because of his public status as an eCelebrity. There is no way around that. You or I would never receive the same treatment. There is no way around that either. I personally could care less (short of answering a question). What I do care about is Riot proving themselves hypocritical once again (once publicity/profits are involved).

The only thing that really matters in this case is what was Riot's motivation in unbanning tyler1. Riot currently declines to comment.

7deadLeeSlnz1 votes

{quoted}

Cool.

So they made an exception so that he could play on stream. I am aware of the definition of ID ban so save your breath, the facts are: Tyler1 is toxic. He has consistently proven to be toxic. Tyler1 was allowed to create new accounts to play. Tyler1 was banned again once those accounts were seen on stream. Tyler1 is no longer being banned on sight (of public play/stream).

Riot made an exception because of his public status as an eCelebrity. There is no way around that. You or I would never receive the same treatment. There is no way around that either. I personally could care less (short of answering a question). What I do care about is Riot proving themselves hypocritical once again (once publicity/profits are involved).

The only thing that really matters in this case is what was Riot's motivation in unbanning tyler1. Riot currently declines to comment.

If you would have look at this link https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/115013815928-Understanding-ID-Bans everything you need to know is explained. They did not have a official policy until last year for ID bans so it is not about being famous. Every player gets the same treatment.

BTW Riot did made an exception when they gave him an ID ban or do you know of any other case in which a non famous player got an ID ban?

So, where is the hypocrisy ( where was it before)?

Oxyrotten2 votes

{quoted}

If you would have look at this link https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us/articles/115013815928-Understanding-ID-Bans everything you need to know is explained. They did not have a official policy until last year for ID bans so it is not about being famous. Every player gets the same treatment.

If creating a special policy specifically for special treatment and not applying the same policy that the rest of us are under... HOW is that not special treatment?

ID bans are extremely uncommon. To date, only a handful of players globally have ever received an ID ban. - Riot

So what your saying is they applied a special ban to him because he is not a special case? How does that compute to you?

BTW Riot did made an exception when they gave him an ID ban or do you know of any other case in which a non famous player got an ID ban?

So, where is the hypocrisy ( where was it before)?

I am well aware of what an ID ban is lol. But thank you for providing the information necessary to explain this.

ID bans are different—and more serious—than normal account permabans. An ID ban is a rare, drastic step we take against players who've consistently chosen not to play to win or to abide by our terms of service. When we determine a player should receive an ID ban, it's effectively a statement that we don't want that particular person to create, access, or use any account on a Riot platform or game for the duration of the ban. - Riot

Tyler1 has not only proven to be toxic, he has proven to be consistently toxic without reformation. He has over 20 permabans. Meaning they have given him over 20 chances to reform, every single time he has said "I'm sorry, I will not do it again, I promise" and every single time he has lied. He has proven that he will not reform. So he deserves another chance? That is what riot is saying, that tyler1 deserves another chance. Would you get even a second chance? Would I get a second chance? Yet tyler gets 20+ second chances, and after those 20+ second chances riot decides they are done giving him second chances, yet here we are again with another second (20+th) chance... That is hypocritical.

I know what your going to say, your going to point out that permabans only apply to accounts, yes but Riot made it specifically clear that tyler was not allowed to play additional accounts on stream or on video, something tyler refused to do (more proof he will not reform?). Your going to point out that you can apply to appeal, sure except tyler1 has consistently proven that he will not reform, that is the entire point of getting an ID ban in the first place. How can you deny that is hypocritical behavior?

So, where is the hypocrisy ( where was it before)?

How often do you think permabans get overturned? Not that often, yet most of the examples of Riot removing permabans is for eCelebs and pro players? Why is that? Could it be because they promote sales/LCS/the game? Regardless that also seems pretty hypocritical to me. So is Rutledge getting his job back and being unbanned as well?

Please go reread my original post you replied to until you understand it, in that post I broke it down pretty plain and simple.

7deadLeeSlnz1 votes

{quoted}

If creating a special policy specifically for special treatment and not applying the same policy that the rest of us are under... HOW is that not special treatment?

So what your saying is they applied a special ban to him because he is not a special case? How does that compute to you?

I am well aware of what an ID ban is lol. But thank you for providing the information necessary to explain this.

Tyler1 has not only proven to be toxic, he has proven to be consistently toxic without reformation. He has over 20 permabans. Meaning they have given him over 20 chances to reform, every single time he has said "I'm sorry, I will not do it again, I promise" and every single time he has lied. He has proven that he will not reform. So he deserves another chance? That is what riot is saying, that tyler1 deserves another chance. Would you get even a second chance? Would I get a second chance? Yet tyler gets 20+ second chances, and after those 20+ second chances riot decides they are done giving him second chances, yet here we are again with another second (20+th) chance... That is hypocritical.

I know what your going to say, your going to point out that permabans only apply to accounts, yes but Riot made it specifically clear that tyler was not allowed to play additional accounts on stream or on video, something tyler refused to do (more proof he will not reform?). Your going to point out that you can apply to appeal, sure except tyler1 has consistently proven that he will not reform, that is the entire point of getting an ID ban in the first place. How can you deny that is hypocritical behavior?

How often do you think permabans get overturned? Not that often, yet most of the examples of Riot removing permabans is for eCelebs and pro players? Why is that? Could it be because they promote sales/LCS/the game? Regardless that also seems pretty hypocritical to me. So is Rutledge getting his job back and being unbanned as well?

Please go reread my original post you replied to until you understand it, in that post I broke it down pretty plain and simple.

I could now go ahead and show you on your arguments why you are wrong but by your answer which is probably based on bias you show me that it makes no sense to discuss this further with you as your argumentation has wrong informations and bend the meaning of my words to your own advantage.

Oxyrotten2 votes

{quoted}

I could now go ahead and show you on your arguments why you are wrong but by your answer which is probably based on bias you show me that it makes no sense to discuss this further with you as your argumentation has wrong informations and bend the meaning of my words to your own advantage.

Go ahead and show me. Please. (only semi-sarcastic, I am capable of objective view)

Your only words were:

They did not have a official policy until last year for ID bans so it is not about being famous. Every player gets the same treatment.

This is a question not a statement so how could I possibly bend the meaning of this? You drew no conclusion from this so how are you applying meaning?

When/how did you associate the creation of the ban to celebrity status? How does a policy being created not effect the player's (whose status are in question) that the policy is applied to? I am really not sure how you are drawing this conclusion as the too elements are unrelated. What is related is that an ID ban policy was created to police players who were consistently toxic over multiple accounts in order to prevent them from just creating more accounts and continuing to add the cycle of toxicity, and tyler1 proving to be one of these people the ban was applied to.

and:

BTW Riot did made an exception when they gave him an ID ban or do you know of any other case in which a non famous player got an ID ban?

This is entirely my point. Thank you for illustrating it for me. Ecelebrity status has garnered tyler1 and other professional players and streamers special treatment, and then to further the hypocrisy Riot provides additional special treatment by overturning behavior based bans. Can you honestly tell me that would happen if it were you or me (and really this is ALL it comes down to)?

usul12022 votes

Part of the condition for this un-ID ban was that he turn in all of his active accounts for riot to specifically look over their entirety for any form of toxicity, and he passed their personal check. I'm not a fan of the dude personally, but if he gets his shit together then more power to him.

Oxyrotten1 votes

{quoted}

Part of the condition for this un-ID ban was that he turn in all of his active accounts for riot to specifically look over their entirety for any form of toxicity, and he passed their personal check. I'm not a fan of the dude personally, but if he gets his shit together then more power to him.

I just find this amusing since the number of his accounts after the ID ban are fewer that the number of accounts before the ban. Meaning he has been banned for toxic behavior more than he has been banned for breaking the ID ban (why does nobody talk about the fact that this is still a violation of Riot's rules, showing he is not reformed?).

Meaning he has more cases of toxicity than cases of reformation.

Honestly I could care less either way, although I would like to see more of the TCS (personally I think that was rather groundbreaking, as well as I enjoyed the subtle stab at the LCS).

Telephone Booth2 votes

{quoted}

What is with all the thread lately from people who obviously deserve to be banned complaining about getting banned?

I don't know... wasn't school out recently for the holidays? I'm assuming that's why. It will die down. But they are always around.

dKiWi1 votes

means riot's system is working as intended.

Telephone Booth2 votes

What you need to realize, is that EVERYONE has had this happen to them. But why isn't everyone banned? Because we don't all react to flame in such a nasty, defensive, insecure way. You lash back hard dude. You need to learn to brush things off.

You can't start insulting people just because someone insulted you. You can in real life... hell, you can insult people even if they have done nothing to you. But not in league. Please read the summoners code, and if you want to play league, just follow it. It's that simple.

These are strangers who don't know you, your skill level, your personality... And they see you play for 5 minutes and you take their insults personally? They're just assholes dude. Mute, report, move on. No need to get upset and insult them back, risking your account.

Just be secure with your own skills, there are obviously worse players out there, and even if you are horrible at the game, it is still just an inconsequential game. Don't let your emotions get the best of you, because Riot doesn't tolerate any insulting of teammates.

You should have simply muted them, reported them, and moved on knowing that your account is safe and that asshole's account is under scrutiny and possibly will be suspended, restricted, or banned.

More from Player Behavior

The indefinite banning of Tyler1
Player Behavior4,799 comments
2,942
votes
14 day ban because playing Nunu Support with Smite is "stealing other people's roles"...?
Player Behavior1,525 comments
1,086
votes
Riot should add monthly status cards
Player Behavior241 comments
843
votes
Reminder that we haven't gotten our Summoner report cards yet :/
Player Behavior145 comments
619
votes
I'm not "triggered" by you throwing insults.
Player Behavior361 comments
548
votes
Black Alistar, King Rammus!!!!
Player Behavior462 comments
503
votes