Boards›Player Behavior

Gameplay toxicity vs Verbal Toxicity

JlackBesus·3/30/2016, 7:24:37 PM·3 votes·708 views

http://imgur.com/9E3Qu3E I know it is just silver. But check my history, i get them feeders 3 games in a row. demoted first loss at 0 LP. The last game the bot didnt leash, fed twice and the sup left. Top had been feeding non stop with the jg. I beat ahri as tf in farm and 1v1. She said ggez in the end. Riot I like how you emphasize so much on verbal toxicity but do no shit on gameplay toxicity. People can feed and feed as long as they dont say a single shit in game. Afk queue doesnt do shit neither, people can just watch youtube in the 20 mins. However, the ones that try and communicate in game gets chat restricted or banned cuz people are "offended". You can mute people but u cant stop people from feeding, you cant bring them back in game. Now I have to grind for few games to get back to s3 thanks.

8 Comments

RedTao3/30/2016, 7:36:40 PM2 votes

Verbal "Toxicity" is all they care about. It doesn't matter if they gave you the mute button to combat it (Which the majority of people who report never use), people would rather sit there and get offended and not do anything but "Get back" at said person at the end of the game. Riot doesn't bother with gameplay toxicity because there's too much effort needed to prove someone is intentionally trolling vs as long as people have issues with what you're saying in chat, they can just send log to you with your ban.

ModWulf Helhammer3/30/2016, 8:43:28 PM1 votes

Yes, in fact, they do punish gameplay toxicity. It's just a lot harder to prove, so it takes longer for anything to happen (is that guy actually feeding, or is he just having a really bad game?)

If they establish a pattern of feeding, then they will be punished. Chat toxicity is punished faster because, well, they have chat logs