Should people on your team be able to ban your pick?
I don't think so what do you all think. I dodge when happens but I don't think I should have to.
8 Comments
This thread came up a few days ago. And a few days before that. And a few days before that. Repeat.
Look, I know it sucks to not get to play the champ you want to play, but bans trump pick INTENTS. Your pick isn't your pick until it's locked in. Your pick intent can change at any time up until you make your pick. Say I want to ban the flavor of the week, and you have that flavor of the week hovered. In your scenario, I wouldn't be able to ban it. Then at the last moment you no longer decide you want to play that flavor of the week. Now it's open. This would be easily abused by people/duos/teams who want to make sure champs stay open.
Back in Ye Olden Dayes, the person in the first slot got to pick all the bans. It's way better that we each get one ban and we each get one pick.
TL;DR Bans > Pick Intent
Yes.
Example. You are last picking and you want a highly contested pick (ex. Akali right now), and your teams first pick doesn't have her. No one wants to play against her and there is a very high chance she will be picked so your teammate bans her to rule that option out.
Yes absolutly if some of ya kids cant work it up that ur opt getting banned better look for another hobby.
Also it has a meaning behind just banning the allied yasuo, like banning op/new/desired champs even when ur 4-5 pick hovers it cuz he will not get it obviusly and u will not like to play aginst it. Also going kindred adc is borderline trolling so ye i prefer is we draw the line there-------------------------(line) that showing off ur intended pick is fine if you can accept that ur champ might still get banned and that of some picks never be acceptable, like kindred adc seriusly dont do that.