So this is OK by riot standards?
Reformed?
Reformed?
It's not up to Riot to decide, it's up to the players ingame to decide whether they should report others within the game. Not Riot, not Twitch, not Reedit.
I'm sure plenty reported him, and I'm sure Xmithie reported him. The fact is this is not the first time he has done this in chat since he got unbanned, my question is, what is the reason behind Riot protecting him and giving him a free pass?
Riot protecting him and giving him a free pass?
This biased way of thinking is not productive. Riot can't go out onto the Internet and hunt down people who might be breaking the rules. People have to use the in-game report system and punishment will be delivered if warranted.
I'm sure plenty reported him, and I'm sure Xmithie reported him.
How are you sure?
How are you not sure?
If you get called "ugly af" in game, you won't report him?
I never claimed one way or the other, you're the one with the claim. I'd know when I report someone because I'm the one reporting. I'm aware of my own actions.
So I guess to answer your question, "How are you not sure?", I'm not sure because I literally don't know if they reported him or not.
How are you sure of the actions of the other people in that game?
Let's understand the punishment system a little.
Firstly, you will only get a review if someone reported you.
Secondly, the punishment system punished based on consistency x severity.
Now let's take a look at high ELO player / streamer behavior:
So let's piece all of that together.
If players dont report each other, there is no display of consistency towards the system.
Even if they do report each other here and there, the amount of games they play dilute the consistency on their toxicity.
Even if an account is getting close to punished, they can play on another account and spread out the toxicity elsewhere.
So unless you can track how many games someone was being reported on the same account with a high ratio of toxicity, they won't get punished for it. All three factors have to be there.
Naming and shaming is not allowed by their standards either.
Anyway he did nothing that's worth more than a 10 games chat restriction.
I believe public clips and streams hosted by the person being discussed are exempt from that rule, since the clips and videos are public. There's no expectation of privacy.
Yeah, discussions regarding the behavior of streamers/content creators have a bit more leniency in regards to the Naming & Shaming rule, though last I had seen mention of it was probably...Early last year, maybe late the year before?
Either way, the rationale is that, as they make their content (and consequently behavior) public (through streams, YouTube videos, etc.), discussing their behavior is fair game.
I know its not nice but anyone else think Tyler1 looks like an angry, shaved albino gurrila?