[{quoted}](name=Awkward Couch,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=iMN5Nm95,comment-id=000500020000,timestamp=2016-05-06T21:38:21.736+0000)
I guess you and I have a disconnect here.
In the sense that I follow objectivism/analytical prowess and feminists/leftists do not.
If I started talking with hate speech in my job, I'd get fired rather quickly.
Being at work and being in a social situation are not the same thing, plus it wouldn't be "hate speech", it would be "anything that does not pertain to work during an exercise/sale/etc."
Why would I treat people I see in real life and people on the internet differently?
Strawman argument, good try though.
"Hate speech" is a myth ... but allow me to demonstrate;
If I said I have intense hatred for Ted Bundy, I wish he had never been born and I am glad he is dead
I am stating directly that I have hatred, wishing death on a person, would you consider this hate speech? (For the millenials, Ted Bundy was a serial killer that brutally murdered a lot of people), no you probably wouldn't.
However, if I speak out against the rampant feminism/leftism being pushed by people like you, you might consider that "hate speech" because I am against the current authority/system. That is why "Hate speech" doesn't exist.
"Hurt Feelings" is not an argument and it disappoints me whenever I see a company I admire submit to the "Hurt Feelings" argument.