Skip to content

Help, my friends are unjustifiably banned when we tried to do a strategy that includes inting

Charlotte··9 votes·3,739 views

My friends and I just played a premade 5s normal game and we wanted to try a new strategy that we took inspiration of the game where the 0/35 Nunu and 0/40 Rammus won. The game can be found in this Pants R Dragon video: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RYv6HdiLnMQ&t=542s

My friends and I wanted to try a similar trick for fun to where my bait the enemy team into grouping 5 mid by having 2 of us intentionally feed kills and pretending that we are giving enemies free kills. Inside the game our strategy did not work because the enemy team knew what we were doing so we decided to ff at 15. Our inting friends inted solely because our whole team decided on it since it was part of the strategy, they did not intend to ruin our gameplay at all. Shortly after the game, both of my freidns are been suspended for 14 days and have lost their honors etc. I understand that we may have ruined the gameplay for the enemy team but we really did not mean any harm by the intings. We did not know that this would happen and we only did this because we truly thought it could be a viable strategy as shown in Pants R Dragon's video in where the 0/35 and 0/40 players won the game. Please unban my friends because they do not deserve to be banned since this was part of our strategy that we planned out in a normal game. Riot can check our chat log that we told them to int in the chat and that we tried to trick the enemy team into thinking that they have free kills in mid lane. None of the players in our premade party reported our two inters and none of our gameplay was ruined by the inting. I am very sorry if there were any other rules that could've been the reason for their immediate bans and I want to make clear that we did not intend to do any harm, it was a legitimate attempt at trying out a new strategy.

27 Comments

Umbral Regent9 votes

Why in the world would you consider a strategy that involves breaking the rules? Intentionally feeding, of all things. Whether you intended harm or not, you still ruined the game for the enemy team with that asinine strategy - depriving them of a fair match through intentionally feeding for the sake of some half-baked "strategy".

I don't expect Riot would lift the suspensions on your friends' accounts, but in the off-chance that they do:

Never pull something like this again. For real. If you're gonna try new strategies, stay in line with the rules.

disregardable2 votes

They considered it because the youtuber did it, and they didn't get banned.

This is the IFS's fault for being inconsistent.

Charlotte2 votes

{quoted}

They considered it because the youtuber did it, and they didn't get banned.

This is the IFS's fault for being inconsistent.

No, he is right. We possibly ruined the game for the enemy team and that was our fault. The argument comes when you consider what if we had won the game and our strategy succeeded. If we had told the enemy team that our inting was part of the strategy from the start, it is technically not ruining their gameplay as it was part of our strategy and it worked out. However it did not work out and now my friends are punished. All 5 of us could not foresee this happening as we all thought it would be okay since we were all premade 5s and it was just a normal game.

Automated Riven3 votes

No he is not right. You made a strategy to win and your intentions were to win the game. That is not against the rules. What's against the rules is griefing your team and assisting the enemy team. Neither of those apply here since the intention was to win the game, not help the enemy win.

Umbral Regent2 votes

This is the IFS's fault for being inconsistent.

Have you considered that it may be more an error on the part of the players instead of the system? I've heard that those in the higher tiers (Diamond+) are few enough in number that most everyone knows each other, and few of them bother to report one another. It stands to reason that they might not have even gotten reported, if they haven't been punished for it.

Jo0o7 votes

Actually, I think Riot should lift the ban, possibly while creating a rules exception to disallow this in the future.

We're under no obligation to use strategies that are "fun" for our opponents to play against. If OP's whole team was in on it, there really shouldn't be a problem. The enemy players probably reported the feeders in support of OP and the non-inting teammates, not out of their own frustration.

I do agree that it would ruin a game, but if five players all agree that this is the best strategic course of action, the enemy team shouldn't have any say in that matter.

Tyaisurm1 votes

Yes. As long as the team agrees on something, they should be allowed to do it (does not include 3rd party "solutions" like scripts though).

And on individual level, if someone plays unconventionally stuff like ap Jhin in jungle, they shouldn't be punished unless they intentionally want to help enemy team and/or hinder their own team's success.

Umbral Regent1 votes

Actually, I think Riot should lift the ban, possibly while creating a rules exception to disallow this in the future.

Fair enough. They did learn their lesson, after all, but I still personally err on the side of letting them sit it out to really let it sink.

We're under no obligation to use strategies that are "fun" for our opponents to play against.

I feel this may be a miswording on my part; when I say "ruin the game" in this case, I'm moreover referring to the competitive integrity of it. It should be five players versus five players - each side helping their respective team, and not the other. You may've seen me take the same stance in a previous thread, but the gist of it is this;

If someone employs a strategy or does something that makes the game objectively less fair between teams (opening lanes, calling out team positions, strategies involving intentionally feeding, etc.) - I feel that it should unequivocally be punished.

Though, this also comes with something of a caveat - call it a double-standard if you wish - but there are some tactics I would consider valid that do tip some of the power balance between teams. Targeted suppression being an example (I.E, denying enemy Junglers farm, tunnelling on Kindred's Wolf marks, or camping enemy players to give them a harder time of coming online)

But the distinction lies in the fact that those latter examples still have some way for the enemy to play around it. Junglers can counterjungle as well or tax lanes after ganks, Kindred can try to get help skrimishing around their marks or focus on Champion marks, and players knowing they're being camped can play more defensively, get help, or roam to mitigate the disadvantage.

Those prior examples have no real counterplay value or interaction against - you can't have fun adapting to an open lane, because it's just free-pushing. Calling out team positions - it's no fun when you know exactly what your opponents are up to. And intentionally feeding has absolutely minimal tactical value, because whatever progress you gain from the diversion, you lose twicefold from the gold advantage the enemy gains.

I do agree that it would ruin a game, but if five players all agree that this is the best strategic course of action, the enemy team shouldn't have any say in that matter.

I don't particularly agree, but I hope at least my position is understood. And, whether it is or isn't, at least we can agree to disagree.

Tyaisurm1 votes

If you only strictly follow rules in a game like league, how are you supposed to find new things that might work?

And before you say "Play bots" , that's invalid. Vs. bots and vs. people are two completely different scenarios.

EDIT: just to clarify, breaking conventional "game rules" is what keeps games fresh, such as this inting strategy. It doesn't matter if it works or not in the end, and it shouldn't matter what ENEMY TEAM THINKS about this strategy, if entire team using it is on the same page.

Umbral Regent2 votes

If you only strictly follow rules in a game like league, how are you supposed to find new things that might work?

If the rules were all void in the case of developing a new strategy, then what's the point of having rules in the first place? What's stopping me from playing a game of Soccer, and kicking people's knees out? It's wholly against the rules of Soccer, but it's a strategy, and it might work.

Intentionally feeding is against the rules of League. Kicking people's knees out is against the rules of Soccer. If those rules can just be completely ignored for the sake of "strategy"...Why have the rules in the first place?

just to clarify, breaking conventional "game rules" is what keeps games fresh, such as this inting strategy.

See, you refer to the intentional feeding strategy in the same turn as saying "conventional 'game rules'" as though "not feeding" is just part of the meta.

Riot, point-blank, does not tolerate intentional feeding. Not feeding isn't some convention that people do because it's the most logical thing to do (which it is, you don't win by helping the enemy team), intentionally feeding the enemy team is straight up against the rules.

It doesn't matter if it works or not in the end, and it shouldn't matter what ENEMY TEAM THINKS about this strategy, if entire team using it is on the same page.

Sure, coming up with new strategies shouldn't consider whether or not the strategy will work in the end. That's the point of coming up with new strategies.

But in regards to the enemy team - why shouldn't their position matter? As far as anyone's concerned, they all signed up for a fair and equal match of League of Legends. It's not fair for them to be fed free kills, and it's definitely not fair for them to get what amounts to an illegitimate win in a match that boils down to "one team attempts to int and surrenders at the earliest opportunity when the strategy fails".

Tyaisurm

_ "Intentionally feeding is against the rules of League. Kicking people's knees out is against the rules of Soccer. If those rules can just be completely ignored for the sake of "strategy"...Why have the rules in the first place?"_

Football analogy doesn't apply here, since even though both it and League are team-based games, other is a game with much more limited gameplay elements - and is not updated like the other one. (also MOBA vs football... completely different)

Game of league is about matching two teams of equal rank against each other to see which one wins when both are trying to win. "fair and equal match of League of Legends" means this. It doesn't matter if other teams decides to knowingly use a bad strategy.

Ph03n1xb1rd2 votes

Which rule did they broke? Can you quote?

For example one player suiciding (taking attention), when the rest of the team secures an objective, should be banned? The "bait" sacrificed himself (INTED), so the others can take an objective. If everyone agrees on a stategy like this, then it is NOT against the rules, since they tried to win (in a strange way)....

zPOOPz7 votes

No one wants to play with or against an afk or inter. You still ruined the game for your 5 enemies (who likely reported your friends).

Just like when you are in a premade 5 and someone afk, no matter if your entire team has no problem with 4v5 afk, that person would still be punished.

Using inting as a strategy opens a door most people will not want to see opened and it is explicitly against the rules (unlike off-meta picks and off-meta builds).

I'm not entirely sure I would support your friends' unpunishments be lifted because this is a game of 10 people, not just your premade 5.

Automated Riven7 votes

I am seeing alot of talk about how feeding is against the rules.

This is NOT true if the purpose is to win. 5 people trying to win are not breaking the rules no matter which strategy is employed so long as it is not deviating from the design of the game (IE no hacking)

What is against the rules is griefing your teammates and assisting the enemy team. Neither of these apply if your entire team agrees to an unconventional strategy.

That being said. If your teammates got banned it likely wasn't due to just that one game. Bans will almost never escalate to an instant 14 day ban from 1 game. Unless it has hate speach or agressive stuff such as 'kys'. Typically it's reports from multiple games and the punishment system has a progression period.

Tyaisurm1 votes

Bans can and WILL escalate. If you int hard enough and get reported for it, you get instant 14 day ban without any prior punishments.

And the thing with stuff like 'kys' is all about the zero-tolerance system. It can be used as non-aggressively in many situations, but "zero-tolerance" never takes context into account.

Imperial Pandaa3 votes

Inting and gameplay toxicity is always a 14 day first punishment. There are no lesser ones.

Tyaisurm1 votes

"True" inting is always 14 days if caught, but gameplay toxicity varies. This is how I understand it.

Scuttle2 votes

all gameplay bans are classified as inting in the reform card, even things like anivia wall trolling. and it will always give a 14 day ban first offense

Best Vi Earth1 votes

this was a normal 5 man premade . if the information is correct then all it should take is for those 5 people to send a ticket to riot support. if the intent was to win and not to force strategy on your team then its fine.

Tyaisurm1 votes

Yes. System doesn't know (or someone viewing match history) if this situation was "strategy test", or "attempt to ruin other people's game"

redniwediS6 votes

You had a full premade, yes? No randoms at all?

Have your friends make a support ticket and explain this. Tell them to be polite and make sure to clearly state that the entire team was on board with what you were doing.

https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us

Charlotte1 votes

{quoted}

You had a full premade, yes? No randoms at all?

Have your friends make a support ticket and explain this. Tell them to be polite and make sure to clearly state that the entire team was on board with what you were doing.

https://support.riotgames.com/hc/en-us

Yes one of my friends have sent a ticket, and 4 of us were in a discord call whiel 1 of us stayed in league voice chat because he was blasting loud music and did not want the people in the discord to hear. We were all 100% on board with the strategy and even planned our the picks before entering champion select. None of our premade players reported any of the inters after the game.

redniwediS2 votes

Make sure every friend that got a punishment makes a ticket.

Ph03n1xb1rd2 votes

So you all 5 were premade and everyone agreed on this? Because then i see no problem with this...

But remember, Rito tends to ban for playing OFF-meta too, so i don't really know what will they do. Anyway, try a support ticket...

VindicatorOFThey1 votes

Did it work tho :o

AJStarhiker1 votes

I'd suggest everyone from the team fill out support tickets, not just the punished players. That would make it clearer to Riot it was a full team decision.

Oleandervine1 votes

They're only suspended for 14 days. If they come back and they're on their toes and keep out of trouble, things will reverse for them.

More from Player Behavior

More by Charlotte