intentional feeding should be a 2 week ban minimum

dominatrixmama··1 votes·1,405 views

I reported someone for intentional feeding (3-17-5, said they were going to int, and asked for ff at 5 minutes in). I was surprised to receive a notification that they were punished in the client. However, 24 hours later and they are already playing again??? There is no excuse for inting, this guy single handedly wasted everyone's time in a game that could have been winnable. Sometimes people flame a bit when they are pissed off and maybe cross the line. Smaller bans are reasonable for this, but inting? Should be a 2 week ban 1st offense and perma ban 2nd offense. These people completely ruin the game. Even if you are mad, you can at least mute your team mates and keep trying.

edit: maybe the ban was for what they typed in chat and the system still has not banned them for inting.

10 Comments

Umbral Regent9 votes

intentional feeding should be a 2 week ban minimum

...It is, though.

dominatrixmama1 votes

really? maybe the automated ban was for what they typed in chat? either way the dude is playing games after one day.

KVbqbFsC8e1 votes

"just a bad game"

Timethief493 votes

This already is how inting gets punished. Problem is its basicly impossible to automate, so it takes a whole lot longer for a inter to get punished than for a flamer.

Zombie Gerbil2 votes

Just because of your first encounter with an individual was a bad experience doesn't mean the individual does it consistently every game. If they do, then by the policy they'll be penalized accordingly. That's like saying when you have a bad day, you flamed someone and they suggest you should be banned immediately for two weeks due to one game maybe two.

Summonah123691 votes

[{quoted}](name=Zombie Gerbil,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PwrXP5jW,comment-id=0002,timestamp=2018-07-14T21:35:35.099+0000)

Just because of your first encounter with an individual was a bad experience doesn't mean the individual does it consistently every game. If they do, then by the policy they'll be penalized accordingly. That's like saying when you have a bad day, you flamed someone and they suggest you should be banned immediately for two weeks due to one game maybe two.

Yeah I agree that some inters might not int every single game, but they can do it every now and then, especially if you look at their match history.

Zombie Gerbil1 votes

Match History scores have very little to do with it. That doesn't mean they're doing intentionally. Everyone has bad games, especially in this season meta. Everyone can be snowballed from kills. If you see their score and it's like 3/15/2, but none of their pathing was going into 1v5, or going under their nexus turret into their fountain doesn't mean they're intentionally feeding. Besides, Int' is the new inflammatory trend for League of Legends. I've seen plenty of players who went 1/4/9 and said they're int'n because the other player wasn't playing by their standards.

People have bad games. Not everyone is LCS material or Challenger tier.

Summonah123691 votes

[{quoted}](name=Zombie Gerbil,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=PwrXP5jW,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2018-07-14T21:51:52.280+0000)

Match History scores have very little to do with it. That doesn't mean they're doing intentionally. Everyone has bad games, especially in this season meta. Everyone can be snowballed from kills. If you see their score and it's like 3/15/2, but none of their pathing was going into 1v5, or going under their nexus turret into their fountain doesn't mean they're intentionally feeding. Besides, Int' is the new inflammatory trend for League of Legends. I've seen plenty of players who went 1/4/9 and said they're int'n because the other player wasn't playing by their standards.

People have bad games. Not everyone is LCS material or Challenger tier.

Was justt sayin'.

Zombie Gerbil1 votes

I understand. I was just stating you have to take the match history with a grain of salt.

Modi1 votes

It does.

More from Player Behavior