The Argument of a Leager

Lillian44: gg MeowIDGAF: ez assss game Notshivam <PRC>: gg Davidad was the most honorable player on their team Lillian44: not even one honor x) RaiderViking: nice job Notshivam <PRC>: i reported vel and ashe btw Lillian44: supp life RaiderViking: Sona you did great MeowIDGAF left the lobby Arkhe Marx left the lobby Lillian44 left the lobby RaiderViking: NOtshivam, what would you do if Sona somehow made MF ragequit? LineyLaunch20 left the lobby Davidad left the lobby RavenTT left the lobby Notshivam <PRC>: honestly it didnt seem like taric was toxic Notshivam <PRC>: he wasnt in all chat Notshivam <PRC>: now you can report him idc RaiderViking: He typed more messages in All Chat than me, fyi, but okay. Notshivam <PRC>: but were they negative in all chat? Notshivam <PRC>: i dont think so RaiderViking: I stated facts Notshivam <PRC>: as am i Notshivam <PRC>: im not saying you are wrong RaiderViking: 4v5 and it's because ashe didn't get any support in lane Notshivam <PRC>: and? taric is the reason why fio got back in the game after i was beating her in lane RaiderViking: IT's not negative, it's fact stating and explanation of facts RaiderViking: it's basic logic reasoning of events occuring RaiderViking: if you're reporting me for reporting the facts, then that's a little idiotic, don't you think? Notshivam <PRC>: your tone in the messages were coming off in a negative manner. regardless of statements being fact driven or not Notshivam <PRC>: thats like calling a 600lb person fat. its a fact but its still negative RaiderViking: If you have that perception, that's on you though, I can't speak to you in a verbal tone of voice RaiderViking: so you illistrate to yourself what you believe I may or may not be intending Notshivam <PRC>: look vel, im not saying you are wrong. you may be right Notshivam <PRC>: i wasnt on your team so i dont know what he said. but the stuff you were saying in all chat was negative RaiderViking: All I'm saying is your reason for a report makes little to no logic and lacks ethics of duality RaiderViking: How would you have acted if Ashe pinged for help and taric went mid and stayed mid Chemtech Ionian: You are hostile vel Chemtech Ionian: that good enough Notshivam <PRC>: so because i see that you were being negative in all chat my report lacks reasoning? Chemtech Ionian: I am following up on the report I sent, I am personally making sure you are penalized RaiderViking: your reason for "negative" is an antedotecal perception of how my tone may or may not have been RaiderViking: so your premise is misguided RaiderViking: therefore your arguement lacks integrety Chemtech Ionian left the lobby Notshivam <PRC>: when multiple people not including taric can see that you are being negative then its not only my perception RaiderViking: Taric is a conflict of interest Notshivam <PRC>: its a consensus that my team saw RaiderViking: Sona didn't see anything negative, in fact they were negative more so by calling them feeders, whereas I didn't RaiderViking: Talon didn't see me as negative, in fact, he was more negative than me calling my Kayn a sucky champ RaiderViking: MF just laughed, and said "gg" Notshivam <PRC>: but why fuel the fire by telling us to report taric when i cant even see the toxic comments in all chat? Notshivam <PRC>: you couldve just waited till end of game and reported RaiderViking: Never did I tell you to report taric Notshivam <PRC>: thats on you Notshivam <PRC>: you did! lol RaiderViking: i told you factually that Taric made Ashe ragequit RaiderViking: that is all RaiderViking: Nope, taric told you to report me RaiderViking: I never told you to report him RaiderViking: So by your reasoning, what made me toxic, is what actually confirms Taric being toxic RaiderViking: And you said you would report me, therefore, you too were toxic in your own reasoning Notshivam <PRC>: oh well, since logs are read by people then you shouldnt have an issue RaiderViking: I' RaiderViking: I'm not worried about that RaiderViking: Taric cussed at me in team chat RaiderViking: I never cussed once Notshivam <PRC>: well if you think you are right and i think i am right we should just agree to disagree RaiderViking: I'm just taking your reasoning and logic skills and testing them as to how they're able to uphold an actual reason for a report Notshivam <PRC>: if you werent toxic thats cool RaiderViking: You haven't given even 1 actual example though of your reasoning Notshivam <PRC>: i did lol plenty of times RaiderViking: so how could you be right, and this isn't about "how's right and how's wrong" that is irrelevant, as I just want one valid reason for reporting me RaiderViking: You haven't though, I'm systematically broken each of your premises down and defused their validity Notshivam <PRC>: not really but sounds good man RaiderViking: Have you not been reading? Notshivam <PRC>: i have been reading lol RaiderViking: claiming I said "report taric" which is false, you incriminate yourself because you said "report vel" RaiderViking: and taric said "report vel" RaiderViking: therefore, you both were more toxic than me RaiderViking: using your logic Notshivam<PRC>: my reasoning in for reporting you was simple. your comments made throughout the game in all chat were negative. they werent toxic, they were negative. Notshivam<PRC>: and wrong, I said im not reporting taric after you told us to report him (which you did) RaiderViking: Saying there was a "consensus" is false because MF, Sona, and Talon did not share your sentiment and Kayn on my team didn't either, nor did Ashe including myself, that's 6 out of 10 not agreeing with you RaiderViking: therefore, that isn't correct either Notshivam<PRC>: wrong in my team chat my team believed taric. sorry but you are wrong Notshivam<PRC>: anyways im gonna play my next game you have a good one Notshivam left the lobby RaiderViking: Then the first reason was, an anecdotal claim that the perception of my tone was negative, yet, that is your perceptions, not up for me