Only 0,006% get permabanned?

Rakeoon·5/16/2016, 3:48:32 PM·3 votes·1,632 views

I dont really believe that with all the people complaining about the shitty banning system that only gets flamers banned and only the passive- agressive douchebag wussie pussies remain.

21 Comments

AeroWaffle5/16/2016, 3:55:56 PM9 votes

Considering how much of a jerk you would have to be to get hit with a single punishment, coupled with the fact you have to ignore several warnings that you would lose your account if you continued with the behavior.

I can believe it.

TrulyBland5/16/2016, 4:19:13 PM5 votes

That number has probably increased since then... but not by far. Permabanned players have always been the loudest. That is bound to skew perception if all the "data" you have is amount of forumposts. To put things into perspective: If the forums represented the actual amount of people that are punished, I'm pretty sure there would be more permanent bans than 14-day bans and chat restrictions combined, which obviously makes no sense.

ModMod Curator5/16/2016, 7:19:39 PM4 votes

{quoted}

I dont really believe that with all the people complaining about the shitty banning system

So, basic math would dictate that even 0.006% (your number) ends up being a significant number of people based on the overall population. Even using a small number like 10 million players, that results in 60,000 people being banned.

While we get a lot of posts in this section complaining about their bans, we don't get that many. The majority of people banned seem to take it just fine based on that math. Only a small minority come here and flame because of it.

Sarutobi5/16/2016, 3:55:54 PM2 votes

it really doesnt seem all that far off. especially when this game has well over 10-20 million accounts.

MISTAFUNKTASTIC5/16/2016, 4:21:12 PM2 votes

I believe this stat for false positives on the automated punishment system. I'm not sure it is the number of players who have received punishment.

GamblerOfLives5/16/2016, 5:40:34 PM2 votes

Dude, ofc it's not 0,006:)..and everybody who beilievs this, is so naive:)

Remember when they gave out CR after CR? There was someone that had CR in everygame i played, almost everybody in my list got CR and, even i got CR after CR (not alot-only 30-20 games of CR).. which was stupid, bcs you can't get CR a second time, if you only have 5 msg/game, and i didn'talk at all:)..but still got them- this was before this new system.

They sayed that, only a smar percentage had CR, can't remember the number, but was something extremely low, and unbalievable. I am 100% sure they were lying- which is not surprising- they lied about solo que, didn;t they? In my books, if you did it once, you are bound to do it again:)..Because, they saw that people don't care, and that people are pretty divided when it comes to this- they only need 50% to agree with them:)..even less, so, they are ok with doing this:)

About the current system, the fact that you are unable to make a defence for yourself, to contest something..- this is what's wrong with this system. They just ban your account, bcs they can:)..regardless if it;s a legit ban or not:)..popular opinion shoud not matter in this cases, only justice matter:)