Skip to content

Guy told me to slit my wrists

Dizaro··3 votes·2,505 views
Screenshot

Played a ranked game, didn't do great in lane, he started to flame me so I muted them. After the game he added me as a friend, I figured I'd hear what he was going to say. He said I should have given him his lane then he proceeded to tell me to slit my wrists.

20 Comments

KFCeytron5 votes

{quoted}

I figured I'd hear what he was going to say

Why? Why in the world would you do that?

Dizaro3 votes

Idk didn't think the guy was going to tell me to kill myself. Guess I was wrong

Umbral Regent4 votes

For future reference, if someone flames you in a match of League, you don't want to accept their friend invites, period. Just report them post-game, and move on.

As an aside, you'll want to remove the player's screenname from your post, as Naming & Shaming is against the Boards Universal Rules. If you want to report them, you can use either the post-game report feature (which I assume you did) and/or file a Support Ticket. The Boards is not the place to report others.

LobsterFiesta1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Umbral Regent,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=MATZ2QjE,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2020-02-03T04:34:11.769+0000)

For future reference, if someone flames you in a match of League, you don't want to accept their friend invites, period. Just report them post-game, and move on.

As an aside, you'll want to remove the player's screenname from your post, as Naming & Shaming is against the Boards Universal Rules. If you want to report them, you can use either the post-game report feature (which I assume you did) and/or file a Support Ticket. The Boards is not the place to report others.

This suggestion is part of the problem. "Just report them" is a non-solution, because the system doesnt work.

Umbral Regent3 votes

Define "not working", because frankly, there are plenty of posts within the past week that stand as evidence that the system does work.

Beyond that, if the system "doesn't work", then there's absolutely no solution to the problem whatsoever. The system is the only reliable tool for dealing with toxic behavior, so if the solution isn't to report the players, then there is no solution.

LobsterFiesta1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Umbral Regent,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=MATZ2QjE,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2020-02-03T20:35:39.092+0000)

Define "not working", because frankly, there are plenty of posts within the past week that stand as evidence that the system does work.

Beyond that, if the system "doesn't work", then there's absolutely no solution to the problem whatsoever. The system is the only reliable tool for dealing with toxic behavior, so if the solution isn't to report the players, then there is no solution.

I'll leave you with 3 facts.

Fact 1: The text when you get banned says you're among the 0.04% of players to ever get banned. This number is (laughably) false.

Fact 2: High elo players the get banned, simply play on other smurf accounts and ruin the game experience for others (I particularly enjoy crushing gold4-> plat1 on smurfs - see the numerous nonstop posts about this happening and crying about smurfs/matchmaking as evidence). It's hardly a chore, and people are going to rise or fall to their relative skill cap, regardless, because this is how the system is designed.

Fact 3: By promoting that hard inting/shit gameplay isn't actually the root of why everyone who isn't master+ tier is getting flamed for, you're devaluing actual player skill in the process, and letting people know that they can throw games, and to just "report the flamer," which doesn't solve the actual issue at hand.

I'd actually like to see statistics on average number of report per game for losing team, and winning team. I guarantee you the losing team is 4-500% more. Care to guess why? Because bad players will continue to be bad, and better players will continue to be better. No amount of reports is going to fix this. Banning free accounts doesn't "solve" any "problem." Wake up.

Umbral Regent4 votes

I'll leave you with 3 facts.

Fact 1: The text when you get banned says you're among the 0.04% of players to ever get banned. This number is (laughably) false.

0.06%, you mean. It's hard to really consider your facts when you start off with the wrong number.

Besides that, simply saying it's "false" doesn't actually serve as an argument. By what math do you suppose that it's false? What data do you have to support it?

Let's take a rough number and work from there. So, League's playerbase numbers in the millions, so let's say that the playerbase is roughly seven-million. 7,000,000 x 0.06 = 420,000. And this is just rough numbers, the actual value could vary, and this isn't taking into account any special factors (like individual accounts per player), and there isn't any public-facing data with which to compare the math to.

So unless you somehow have access to data that the community doesn't have access to and are willing to actually go into detail about how the number is false, your claim cannot be regarded as factual. It's just a claim.

Fact 2: High elo players the get banned, simply play on other smurf accounts and ruin the game experience for others (I particularly enjoy crushing gold4-> plat1 on smurfs - see the numerous nonstop posts about this happening and crying about smurfs/matchmaking as evidence). It's hardly a chore, and people are going to rise or fall to their relative skill cap, regardless, because this is how the system is designed.

That doesn't indicate that the system doesn't work, it just highlights a flaw in the Free-to-Play model that League of Legends uses.

Fact 3: By promoting that hard inting/shit gameplay isn't actually the root of why everyone who isn't master+ tier is getting flamed for, you're devaluing actual player skill in the process, and letting people know that they can throw games, and to just "report the flamer," which doesn't solve the actual issue at hand.

This is largely just an opinion. You feel that it devalues player skill, but if someone is "skilled" and getting teammates who underperform, it has to be called into question whether or not the player actually is skilled.

Beyond that, players underperforming or trolling or intentional feeding aren't the root causes of flaming. In point of fact, it'd be difficult to argue that any one thing serves as a root cause, because the reality is that people flaming is the result of several potential stimuli and triggers compounding into the event.

Reporting flamers is the only legitimate recourse players have to deal with them. Reporting the flamer ensures that they'll eventually be punished for their misbehavior, and if the flamer doesn't reform, they'll eventually be banned.

But surely, if it doesn't solve the issue, you must have the magic bullet to do what the IFS can't?

I'd actually like to see statistics on average number of report per game for losing team, and winning team. I guarantee you the losing team is 4-500% more. Care to guess why? Because bad players will continue to be bad, and better players will continue to be better. No amount of reports is going to fix this.

This is a really weird non-sequitur.

Banning free accounts doesn't "solve" any "problem." Wake up.

Then what does? You seem to have all the answers, so why not share your solution instead of just saying "What Riot has doesn't work"?

LobsterFiesta1 votes

7,000,000 x 0.06 = 420,000, but 0.06 doesnt represent 0.06%, it represents 6% -[removed by moderation] The actual number you're looking for here is 4,200, and if you believe that number, then I personally own over 5% of all accounts ever banned by riot for toxicity [lol please]. So I'll assume you agree with this first fact.

You say "That doesn't indicate that the system doesn't work, it just highlights a flaw in the Free-to-Play model that League of Legends uses."

Those two are mutually inclusive. The flaw is why is doesn't work. You're trying to say square wheels don't roll well, because riot made them square, instead of actually making them round in the first place. This is a non-argument, so we'll assume you agree with the fact I presented.


Finally, you interject "Beyond that, players underperforming or trolling or intentional feeding aren't the root causes of flaming."

This is the most patently false statement any moderator, admin, rioter, or interested party has ever made on this forum since its inception. Do you actually read what people post here?


The entire basis of everything you said [deflect, deflect, deflect] is that I should SOLVE the problem, instead of just stating the FACTS here. The thing is, I [no longer] don't get paid to do so, and that's something Riot has to do for itself and its chinese overlords. And that, my muppet friend, is a fact.

Edited and reposted since you decided to escalate. If you'd like proof of employment, I'd be happy to provide it through an official channel.

ModPeriscope2 votes

{quoted}

Edited and reposted since you decided to escalate. If you'd like proof of employment, I'd be happy to provide it through an official channel.

Hey there,

I removed your content as you had insulted someone else on the boards. The PB sub-board has stricter rules regarding player interactions, as we strive to help others when they come here with punishments in the game. So having others state:

isn't fifth grade literacy still a requirement to police a section of the boards here? Guess not, times have certainly changed since 2012 shortly after the tencent buyout.

Is going to be removed. [Edit]-This board is not for trading petty insults, but for providing insight into punishments, including feedback, as well as information about the punishment system.

I'll also point out that specialists do not have the ability to remove content.

....but 0.06 doesnt represent 0.06%, it represents 6%

The actual number is 0.006%. This is most recently displayed in this user's copy imgur link, posted here.

If you have any questions about this moderation action, don't hesitate to reach out to the Boards Moderation Team via:

LobsterFiesta1 votes

The actual number is 0.006%. This is most recently displayed in this user's copy imgur link, posted here.

If you have any questions about this moderation action, don't hesitate to reach out to the Boards Moderation Team via:

.006% Assuming 10 million active accounts is 600 ever banned, literally 6 accounts out of every one hundred thousand. Lets be realistic. The number is patently false and fraudulent. There is well over that number in people crying about their accounts in individual posts in this forum in one month, alone.

There are 3 possible scenarios here.

1: Riot is really bad at math.

2: Riot is lying purposefully.

3: Riot is really bad at math, AND lying purposefully. There is zero transparency here (not that there should be), but the claimed number is so ridiculous that it is beyond any reasonable person trying to justify it.

ModPeriscope3 votes

{quoted}

.006% Assuming 10 million active accounts is 600 ever banned, literally 6 accounts out of every one hundred thousand. Lets be realistic. The number is patently false and fraudulent. There is well over that number in people crying about their accounts in individual posts in this forum in one month, alone.

There are 3 possible scenarios here.

1: Riot is really bad at math.

2: Riot is lying purposefully.

3: Riot is really bad at math, AND lying purposefully. There is zero transparency here (not that there should be), but the claimed number is so ridiculous that it is beyond any reasonable person trying to justify it.

There’s no real clarity with that percentage: thats all they provide, and you can choose to accept it, or not.

Personally, it feels right. I don’t feel there’s a ton of toxic players in my games. And I don’t feel like people venture too far off from the average-that most players in a game aren’t being negative. But some do. If you think about a normal distribution, only a very small percentage of players fall into extremes: only a small number are extremely negative, or extremely positive for that matter.

That distribution probably gets skewed when you’re one of the extremes.

Umbral Regent1 votes

7,000,000 x 0.06 = 420,000, but 0.06 doesnt represent 0.06%, it represents 6% - The actual number you're looking for here is 4,200, and if you believe that number, then I personally own over 5% of all accounts ever banned by riot for toxicity [lol please]. So I'll assume you agree with this first fact.

M'kay. I don't deal with gathering percentage-based values out of decimals often enough to have that perfectly down in my head, so you can pardon a mistake with what I already pointed out was very rough math.

That said, don't assume that I agree with you when you still haven't really proven anything. All you did was point out a mathematical error on my part and adjust the rough numbers. Your claim (that the 0.006% statistic - thanks to Periscope for clarifying - is false) still remains unproven.

Here's how to do that:

  1. Get the number of active accounts in League of Legends.
  2. Get the 0.006% from that number.
  3. Compare with the number of Permanently Banned accounts in League of Legends.

However, since Riot's statistics data is largely private, it's unlikely that you would be able to prove that - which is the point of my rough math above, in case you missed it:

And this is just rough numbers, the actual value could vary, and this isn't taking into account any special factors (like individual accounts per player), and there isn't any public-facing data with which to compare the math to.

So unless you somehow have access to data that the community doesn't have access to and are willing to actually go into detail about how the number is false, your claim cannot be regarded as factual. It's just a claim.

The math was rough because it wasn't intended to be accurate, since there's nothing that could verify whether or not it's true. As a consequence, your claim can't be proven by that same measure.

You say "That doesn't indicate that the system doesn't work, it just highlights a flaw in the Free-to-Play model that League of Legends uses."

Those two are mutually inclusive. The flaw is why is doesn't work. You're trying to say square wheels don't roll well, because riot made them square, instead of actually making them round in the first place. This is a non-argument, so we'll assume you agree with the fact I presented.

You should probably stop assuming, because you're wrong on three counts now.

You're trying to say square wheels don't roll well, because riot made them square, instead of actually making them round in the first place.

I'm saying that the punishment system works, but that the Free-to-Play model conflicts with the punishment system in some regard.

Those two are mutually inclusive. The flaw is why is doesn't work.

The flaw (some toxic players returning on new accounts) is not universal. Not every player who gets permanently banned returns to League, and not every permabanned player who returns continues misbehaving. That indicates that the system does work, just not perfectly.

...we'll assume you agree with the fact I presented.

Until I say "I agree with you", do not assume that I agree with you. Full stop.

Finally, you interject "Beyond that, players underperforming or trolling or intentional feeding aren't the root causes of flaming."

This is the most patently false statement any moderator, admin, rioter, or interested party has ever made on this forum since its inception.

If it's false, explain why.

The entire basis of everything you said is that I should SOLVE the problem, instead of just stating the FACTS here. The thing is, I [no longer] don't get paid to do so, and that's something Riot has to do for itself.

Then there's no point to continuing this discussion. If you claim that the system doesn't work and that you have all the facts pointing towards it, but don't put forward a solution, then all your arguing and all your claims are pointless.

And with that being the case, I'm going to bow out. There's no productive end to continuing this discussion, so it's best to just leave with the advice of "don't assume another party's position".

Bijeesny4 votes

{quoted}

You:

he started to flame me so I muted them.

Also you:

Idk didn't think the guy was going to tell me to kill myself.

Youre not rly good at lying it seems... Just be honest, you wanted that so you have something to complain about dont ya?

Dizaro1 votes

I'd say flaming because I am doing bad in a lane vs telling someone to literally kill themselves are 2 completely different things. If you think I wanted to have people tell me to kms just to post it on here, I'd have a lot more posts. This one was just ridiculous because of the insignificance of what happened, I just lost lane, therefore I should Kill myself. I wasn't shit talking him back or being rude in anyway, yet I should die. Not trying to have something to complain about, I honestly just wanted to see what other people thought, and possibly report this guy to Riot but apparently you're not allowed to post names of players on these forms. Anyway, I can tell people in this community are toxic and me posting about someone telling me to slit my wrists doesn't even get much attention and in fact causes some people to blame me and call me a liar and defending this guy like you, including the multiple upvotes on your comment.

Inkling Commando4 votes

i bet $50 riot won't punish him

Shmeeve1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Inkling Commando,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=MATZ2QjE,comment-id=0001,timestamp=2020-02-03T04:30:00.432+0000)

i bet $50 riot won't punish him

I bet my secret cardboard cutout of ugandan knuckles in a tank.

I Like Teemo3 votes

man ide say some really bannable things back to that boy.. no one comes into my pms and back talks the god of slaps

Ph03n1xb1rd3 votes

I do not see the problem here. 2 friends shittalking eachother. Nobody forced you to befriend this guy.

Posui Gart1 votes

Just unfriend him, block him if he keeps spamming requests, and move on. No need to notify everyone else next time

More from Player Behavior

More by Dizaro