Can we make saying x9 report punishable

Aerin Chi·Mar 2, 2019·2 votes·2,815 views

Playing arurf these few days you get these weird "things" as players spamming x9 another player who didn't perform well and I don't think inciting people to report is a thing that's allowed.

16 Comments

KanzlerMar 2, 20194 votes

Pretty much anything you say that wouldn't be in a children's book is punishable by Riot's standards.

VoldymortMar 2, 20193 votes

#it is

Kei143Mar 2, 20192 votes

It already is.

It's considered mild offense and if they did the same action consistently, they would get punished.

Aerin ChiMar 2, 20192 votes

they need to fix the trashy banbot anyways tbh toxicity shouldn't be the easiest thing to ban people for i want griefers and inters to be banned faster people who actually ruin ranked matches.

PH45Mar 3, 20191 votes

The problem is there isn't a real easy way to detect inting/soft griefing. Blatant running it down gets banned fast but soft-int and griefing is really hard to detect with due to many things. People could just have a really bad game, and if the system did a simple kda check etc they could just get banned for that which wouldn't be right.

Chat logs are just so easy to monitor and check and that's why verbal toxicity gets picked up so easily compared to gameplay toxicity.

Yasuo VS RivenMar 4, 20191 votes

{quoted}

The problem is there isn't a real easy way to detect inting/soft griefing. Blatant running it down gets banned fast but soft-int and griefing is really hard to detect with due to many things. People could just have a really bad game, and if the system did a simple kda check etc they could just get banned for that which wouldn't be right.

Chat logs are just so easy to monitor and check and that's why verbal toxicity gets picked up so easily compared to gameplay toxicity.

and its fucking stupid

PH45Mar 4, 20191 votes

Well come up with a better system then yourself?

Aerin ChiMar 5, 20191 votes

The Tribunal if they actually worked it out better was a better system.

PH45Mar 5, 20191 votes

The tribunal was really slow.

Aerin ChiMar 5, 20191 votes

but quick and inaccurate is good? i'd rather it take it's sweet damned time and do it properly because it actually made the player moderation team actually earn their money doing work. instead of afking or not even existing. riot employees had to actually review cases instead of playing like youtube with their copyright striking problem

PH45Mar 5, 20191 votes

but quick and inaccurate is good?

What do you mean inaccurate? Sure occasionally people might slip through but more often people get punished quite quickly for toxic behavior (excluding soft-inting).

You do realise that daily there are huge amounts of reports made, and if Rioters had to check every singe one through that would take an immense amount of manpower and work time to ever get through, an automated system is required. Even if players took part on it, League community is bigger than ever, much larger than back when the original tribunal existed, thus more cases existing. Sure there would be more people reviewing cases but I doubt it would be enough to get through on a consistent basis.

EedatMar 2, 20192 votes

It already is

dnsupMar 3, 20191 votes

"These days"

Player level is 25. Are you making a joke, or...?

Aerin ChiMar 5, 20191 votes

If you try to be toxic and improperly quote something aren't you the one making a joke? "These few days"

Inkling CommandoMar 4, 20191 votes

and I don't think inciting people to report is a thing that's allowed.

correct. reports do not stack and asking others to report a player is harassment. and there is a good chance that if you cry to the enemy about it they will most likely not care. cause why should they?

Aerin ChiMar 5, 20191 votes

I also love how toxic people keep downvoting because they don't want to be suspended for their backhanded ways that aren't "toxic" supposedly.