- You gain pleasure by others misery
- That's called a SADIST
Sure.
Oh wait, theyre not necessarily having fun are they. A lot of INTers INT exactly because they are not having fun and want to game to end soon.
- The average person feels happy when others are happy and feel sad when others are sad
That is not simply not true. Well first this is more schadenfreude, meaning gaining pleasure while observing others' humiliation or embarrassment; sadistic personality implies the same, but with an added premise that said humiliation or embarrassment is personally inflicted by the sadist (just clearing things up a bit here). So, if youre referring to the more general term "schadenfreude", it is actually common in most (if not all) people that we all have a part of psyche that enjoys the suffering of others, an example I can give you is a poplar comedy genre "slapstick", while people literally laugh at others' physical pain; if youre referring to sadism, there are researches that show that there are 20% people that enjoy sadistic behavior, and the popularity of 50 Shades of Grey probably would baffle you then... (Not to mention this is only pertaining to sexual sadism only, if including broader meaning of sadism there would be even more people so...) In addition, the whole functioning of this game is quite sadistic if you actually think about it -- youre gaining pleasure from playing this game whose point is to kill them over and over again and to starve them from gold and stuff --- thats quite sadistic if you ask me lol.
- They say they are having fun, but are they really having fun? When you get but heart by the little things people do, and u start spamming chat. That does not sound like fun at least not fun to normal people.
"when you get but heart"... Im sorry but I cant help but laughed to that, you mean "butt hurt" right? That's some genius 'typo' over there.
I thought you are talking about INTers (intentional feeders), not about chat-spammers... I mean you can make an argument about why chat-spammers have sad life but here youre just either strawmanning or completely off-topic. Also, do INTers say that they are having fun? I thought INTers INT exactly because they are not having fun and want to game to end soon.
- The average player would like to have a normal game and play the game how RIOT wants the game to be played. (That's how the game is enjoyable for us)
"A normal game"... Hmmmm... That phrase is sketchy... How do you define a normal game? Numerous times Ive heard people say "I just want a normal game which my jungler wont feed my laner first blood and buffs / I just want a normal game which my teammates doesnt suck / I just want a normal game which my team wont die to early invades..." However quite a lot deem these as normal games... And statistically wise those are in fact normal. So are you using that phrase as a statistical phrase --- which you would have to justify by stating your parameters and margins for normality and giving statistics of people INTing in game; or are you using that phrase as a functional phrase--- which you would have to state your definition of the "proposed/expected" functioning of the game which can we can start to work on that.
- If you are having fun by tilting urself and others. You need to unistall this game and go make some friends. Go outside and actually hangout with them. Instead of sit on your ass all day and flame people.
Again youre assuming that theyre having fun. And even still, sure some people have fun doing that, your argument is quite a false dilemma ---- youre proposing either "having fun by tilting yourself and others" or "having friends and hanging out with them" --- that these two are exclusive and there are no middle grounds. Again, that is just, not, true. lol.
If you get annoyed over a video game, you must be so SAD in real life.
I think the other guy here points out the obvious ironic thing here already...
And again, this can make an argument sure, but give your evidences to support this point of view please, because right now youre just throwing out a claim without any supporting points.
Most of these people hide behind a screen and would actually never say it to people in person. If you are like that your a certified PUSSY.
I mean, 1. thats a false assumption --- theres lots of people who yell at others in physical confrontation and vitrtual confrontation, 2. Theres nothing wrong in being "a pssy" in this sense ---- do you think its better to yell at others in physical confrontation whenever annoyed?, 3. This point is off-topic for the sake of this thread but using pssy as a derogatory term is quite misogynistic...
Imagine if you didnt waste your time tormenting people, how you can actually use that time to be productive.
False dilemma alert, again...
More so, even if they arent 'tormenting people', theyre still playing a video game (which like I said involves killing people over and over so I dont see why thats not tormenting but oh well) so Im sure youre aware of how many people criticising that playing video games are not productive --- so I dont see a difference in terms of productiveness for people that 'torment' and people that dont.
So ugh, Id probably suggest you to take a look into "false dilemma" because in various incidences you are committing that and that shows incoherence and flawed logical thinking. Also, you may want to check your facts and technical terms because again various incidences you used a term but the latter words and phrases doesnt correspond to the term and yeah empirical facts are important.
You have a good day sir.
