I was once in the tribunal and review several games and instance where there was insane abuses by other players, these were rare but we did have them now......... It is getting common in every game. It is time for the tribunal to return. I would love to serve the community again.
Weathered2 votesOne of the main reason they removed the tribunal was because of the sheer amount of cases that were coming in to be reviewed, prompting an automated system that could handle them faster. If the tribunal returned it would have to be limited to only a few of the cases that happen, because there are just too many players and not enough of them are dedicated enough to participate in the tribunal.
Alphard922 votesThe only reason they changed it, evwn if it was 1000 x times better than this thing we have now, it's that letting a bot handle all is much cheaper for them. Or do you really think rito actually care about players experience, beside them not leaving the game?
Zezockary2 votesThe tribunal was very slow and had a high rate of false positives. Most people that voted in it just waited until they could vote and then clicked punish.
dYW7w6mjp11 votesThe tribunal was very slow and had a high rate of false positives. Most people that voted in it just waited until they could vote and then clicked punish.
There should be very specific requirements to lower the amount of trolls. 1.) You must not have been put in any of the Tiers of toxicity for 6 months, 2.) You must have played the game for at least 1 year, 3.) Riot must approve your request after 3 "test" games. (They show you 3 examples and you answer). Of course it's still easy for a troll to abuse the system, but it would be a lot more effort for them.
scazzman1 votesThere should be very specific requirements to lower the amount of trolls. 1.) You must not have been put in any of the Tiers of toxicity for 6 months, 2.) You must have played the game for at least 1 year, 3.) Riot must approve your request after 3 "test" games. (They show you 3 examples and you answer). Of course it's still easy for a troll to abuse the system, but it would be a lot more effort for them.
no punishments for 6 months is a little harsh. it takes less time to de escalate a punishment tier. i would say tie it to ranked eligibility "no active chatban or no 14 day for 3 months
dYW7w6mjp11 votesno punishments for 6 months is a little harsh. it takes less time to de escalate a punishment tier. i would say tie it to ranked eligibility "no active chatban or no 14 day for 3 months
That seems fair, the only reason I said 6 was because it would give another reason not to be toxic
Telephone Booth1 votesno punishments for 6 months is a little harsh. it takes less time to de escalate a punishment tier. i would say tie it to ranked eligibility "no active chatban or no 14 day for 3 months
No punishment for 6 months is a little harsh to you? The fuck? Is getting punished just a normal thing to you?
Zezockary1 votesBut then you are making the system which (even while being abused for ease of use and speed) was super slow, even slower. The system you are suggesting audits virtually zero games and punishes almost zero toxicity and still manages a higher false positive rate than the current one.
LordGeovanni2 votesI dont trust the League Community with handling cases. its Basicly a popularity vote ususally on whether or not etc was meta or not being the deciding factor.
Kei1431 votesif you are looking to make sure people get punished, the instant feedback system does that job fine already (though it does a horrible job in letting you know it did something).
If you are looking for community contribution, then there are probably other ways other than the tribunal itself.
KVbqbFsC8e4 votesI wouldn't say the instant feedback system punishes people "just fine". If you want to talk strictly about chat, sure, but it has alot of issues with non chat related offenses.
Thats where the Tribunal was much more effective.
dYW7w6mjp11 votes[{quoted}](name=The Big Piece,realm=NA,application-id=ZGEFLEUQ,discussion-id=Eaxh2Aw4,comment-id=00020000,timestamp=2017-04-18T02:20:27.985+0000)
I wouldn't say the instant feedback system punishes people "just fine". If you want to talk strictly about chat, sure, but it has alot of issues with non chat related offenses.
Thats where the Tribunal was much more effective.
+1
Icy Hot Shoto1 votesIf Tribunal came back then it would have to be manned solely by Riot employees to avoid those who think toxicity is okay from not punishing those who deserve it.
Sure, they could just use those who don't get reported often, but who's to say they're not toxic? They could easily be those who purposely make dumb mistakes to piss off their team instead of typing, and those people don't get reported often. I've had a lot of games where I've seen feeders and everyone left near immediately after the game ended, which gives them no time to report.
Telephone Booth1 votesI'm sorry but I don't trust people's complete lack of logic and rational, critical thinking that I see online, to judge what's right and wrong in game. Fuck that. Little 14 year old boys judging whether my behavior is worthy of punishment? No thank you. You see how people are here. Why would you trust their judgement?
