Boards›Player Behavior

*THE* absolute truth

MÁGAMan·10/13/2017, 2:53:13 AM·1 votes·329 views

People who AFK in a game are infinitely more guilty of detrimental conduct than any other offense that exists in the game period.

This includes intentional feeders, as at least with intentional feeding, the person has to also spend their own time running into lane murdering themselves, whereas with AFK'ing, the person is literally trapping 4 other human beings in a prison for however many minutes until they lose or until that 1 jackass who doesn't want to give up finally gives up the third vote in.

No verbal harassment of any kind can come close to the ACTUAL impact the action of AFK'ing has on 4 other players on your team

Also, votes should clearly be majority rules. 3 votes to surrender vs 2 votes of any other kind = surrender. How it is that 1 AFK person and 1 boring happy-to-lose - who clearly has hours of personal time to blow with no progress to show for it being just fine to him - be able to dictate to the 3 remaining sane people that they have to keep playing this wasteful match?

That is all.

6 Comments

Baka Red10/13/2017, 10:22:31 AM3 votes

Your absolute truth seems like falsehood to me; intentional feeder is always worse than afker. Why? Having one afker means you are playing 4 vs 5. Having one inter means you are playing 4 vs 6. Difference is clear.

I guess you are quite tilted for having an afker in one or several of your previous matches. I recommend taking a break of useful size, forgetting about that and once you are calm again, try to play again and hopefully you have fun.

Oh, and your voting clarity is also fuzzy: 3 vs 2 is practically even. I have had too many "we lost. gg" people in my matches to count. I don't want them to have actual power to make me lose just because they forgot to go to toilet before the match (Yes, that happened) and I believe most other rational players feel the same. Nope. Won't happen. People are born equal, but some are born more equal than others so my opinion is the one that matters. ;)

ModPeriscope10/13/2017, 3:19:11 AM2 votes

3 votes to surrender vs 2 votes of any other kind = surrender.

I may be an old schooler with time on his hands, but a 3/5 is 60%. That dog don't hunt.

Magical Player10/13/2017, 6:27:43 AM1 votes

Never give up, Never surrender you can make come backs and this is a majority minority concern which do you give power to? the SUPER MAJORITY >66%

SEKAI10/13/2017, 10:40:42 AM1 votes

You are saying inting is actually better than afk?

Truth my ass.

Because you know, 4v5 for whatever it is, is at least better than 4v6?

EDIT: 3/2 doesn't count surrender because the team not only has uneven amount of players, it only has a grand total of 5.