I disagree, Riots terms and conditions cannot exist without consideration of modern law which they are forced to adhere with. Regardless of opinion it is true in of its own fact.
The TOU only has to exist in accordance with the law - it does not have to mirror real-world law practices. You can't apply practices of modern law to the rules and punishments of a videogame, because fundamentally, they are apples and oranges. League's rules and punishments play out too differently to real world laws and punishments for the latter's methods to apply to the former.
However, they may have their own punishment, again this punishment fails to prevent the same players (me) from rejoining the community.
And they know that it's impossible to keep someone out - so they have to deliver permanent bans on the assumption that the message gets across, and the punished player leaves. If they don't, and they keep breaking the rules...Well, they'll just have to ban another account, ad infinitum until the player gets the picture and leaves, or shapes up.
I believe in order to properly understand the situation, one must first understand the fundamental concepts of punishment.
Googling up "Punishment definition" gives this:
the infliction or imposition of a penalty as retribution for an offense.
And the fundamental concept of a punishment is to act as a deterrent from repeat offenses. Riot punishes players to try and deter them from committing the same offense again - largely, it works. Sometimes, it doesn't. When it doesn't, that doesn't mean that the punishment was flawed - it means that it just didn't work for that person/case in particular.
The vast majority of the playerbase doesn't even need punishments to deter them from breaking the rules. Most people have no problem following the rules.
It's clear Riots system has much to improve upon, and this is why I bring this topic into consideration.
Sure, Riot's punishment system does have room for improvement. That's a given.
None of that improvement involves letting players get their permanently banned accounts back, though.
Not just for my account, but for the purpose of improving Leagues community with variable input and facts.
You're really going to have to explain this, 'cause I have no clue what the hell you mean by "variable input and facts".
Opinions are welcome, but they do not create improvement.
The only opinion I have given is as follows:
You're supposed to reform before the permanent ban, not after.
Everything else I've said was counterarguments to the idea of allowing players to reclaim banned accounts.