Tiebreaker needs work
Just lost a season, was tied 6-3 with leader but I had 30 less points than him scored.. Even though I beat him both times I played him. Wins against>points scored.
Just lost a season, was tied 6-3 with leader but I had 30 less points than him scored.. Even though I beat him both times I played him. Wins against>points scored.
I disagree. Total points would indicate that the winners team was a stronger team overall or at least more consistent than your team, if not by much, where as wins against could only indicate that your team did really well those two weeks. For example I have a person in my league that only got three wins in the 9 weeks and two of them were against me (the first place team) and he certainly didn't have a better team than me simply did really well in those two weeks.
I understand that Drendrell, since you are from NA, lets take a look at how tie breakers work in the three most popular sports.
MLB - The team with the best record in head to head play.
NFL - Head-to-head (best won-lost-tied percentage in games between the clubs).
NBA - Better winning percentage in games against each other
It would be very hard for you to convince me that his team was stronger than mine, I beat him, 2-0 on the season. Regardless of how many points he put up against other teams, He didn't put enough points up against mine. If we were tied 1-1 I would have no issue with this, he scored more than me and if no tie breaker can be met at the win vs record, then it has to move on to something else (points scored, points against, etc)