Galio shield isn't effected by Ardent Censer
Galio shield isn't effected by Ardent Censer, this needs fixed. His bulwark clearly reads that it is a shield.
Galio shield isn't effected by Ardent Censer, this needs fixed. His bulwark clearly reads that it is a shield.
Galio shield isn't effected by Ardent Censer, this needs fixed. His bulwark clearly reads that it is a shield.
His ability reads that he shields (used as a verb) an ally champion not that it actually is a shield (a noun). When used as a verb "shield" means "to protect" which is exactly what he is doing by granting bonus armor and magic resist. When used as a noun, within the context of the game's mechanics, a shield provides temporary health. A simple change in wording or added clarification of what a shield is should clear up any confusion regarding the in-game descriptions of abilities/items.
It doesn't give people bonus health. Argent Censer only applies to those, I believe. His gives just bonus armor and MR. If it applied on his, it would have to apply on Mord. Then Support Mord would be a thing. D:
This is still a bug, the item reads "Your heals and shields on another unit grant them +25% attack speed". His bulwark says in its name that it is a shield.
Galio's ability is a defensive buff. It boosts your defensive stats. People like Janna give shields that actually block damage. Yeah, I agree they might want to change the wording (on Galio's ability at least), but anyone can easily see the difference with regards to Ardent Censer. Abilities that actually shield damage are what get the AC bonus.