How to be successful at league

"Take responsibility for their actions."

Truer trues have not been trued.

These should be in the Tip rotation and pop up every time someone wants to be toxic.

That's an excellent point.

This should be posted on the launcher.

lol what are you talking about. My grandfather owns a multi million dollar car part creation factory and has run it for over 30+ years successfully and he's a total asshole to his employees. On top of my grandmother owning a private horse training and team penning competition on a bi monthly/tri monthly basis and my grandmother is a lieing cunt who has on multiple occasions infront of me bull face lied to people to get her way lol.

We all end up in the same place, its all about where you start off in life.

a nice story, but if you take a look at who are the "sucessfull" people in our society the picture is vastly different...

I call bullshit. I tend to have and express most of these traits a majority of the time in my life, and yet here I am working a minimum wage job while being leeched off of by my own family. I currently have no woman in my life, and the one I used to have leeched off of my finances and then bailed later on. All my life I've been taken advantage of, lied to, pushed aside, looked down upon, etc.. So having all of those traits makes you a "nice guy", and you know what happens to them, right? They finish last. They get trampled on. They get a mile taken away the moment they give others an inch of kindness. Fuck that. I've been learning more and more that you have to be an asshole and step on others to get what you want in life. You have to learn to become a fucking sociopath these days because it's a dog-eat-dog world!

What a bunch of "feel good" bullshit. Success is based on others failure, it always has and always will be. Everything else is just about being nice, not successful. Embracing change and learning new things are the only points that are even tangentially related to success, though they're not requirements.

Yup pretty much. If anyone here ever watched Scarra on streams or in youtube videos that guy was always looking for how that might have been his fault. While he didn't arrive at that conclusion every single time more often than not his reaction was "I could have played that better" instead of "#$(& NOOB TEAM! WTF RITO PLACING ME WITH THIS TRASH!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! $#@"

Has it occurred to any of you that this image series was authored by someone writing for yet-another-content-linking-portal that most of you have never heard of and whose other top stories include: '18 Famous Celebrities Who Are Dressed Like Mattresses' & '14 Celebs Who Changed Their Gender' ?

The messages are all real pleasant and friendly but an image series published by the self proclaimed "Charticle Platform" may not exactly be based on any actual research over feel-good platitudes.

That picture illustrates everything actually successful people want unsuccessful people to believe. "If I'm nice and help people I'll be rewarded in life!" Meanwhile the billionaire counting his money "Yep, that's exactly what will happen poor social worker, keep believing that." Laughs all the way to the bank.

I mean you do want to have your enemies fail just so u can be successful. Your point is invalid

Nice post!

My attitude for losing a game is never on someone else (unless a troll or someone throws by feeding a hyper- carry, but even then i try my hardest) but is on me, it is my fault we lost and next game i need to try harder. I believe you should never rely on someone else to carry you, but help them carry.

Except for the fact that (sadly) if you are in Bronze you can't just being a teammate. You have to pretty much carry the thing yourself. Of course that also means helping your team, but just because you want to win, not because they are working towards it as well. That's why Bronze support mains are stuck there forever.

Attitude is everything.

The key to being successful is to not care if you are successful or not.

so uh jk news right :D

Nice click bait, however the link had nothing to do with being successful at League at all.

The first picture is a bit off, least from the way I've always heard it. "A successful man hopes and works for his own success. An unsuccessful man works and hopes for others to fail."

What if it's blatantly one person's fault that you lost a game, or a huge portion of the responsibility as to why you lost can all be allocated to one person?

for any of these to even have an effect the player base would have to be objective. laughs all the way to the bank

This is just the author of the article dichotomizing random things that aren't even directly related to each other so that he can bash on things he dislikes... oops, sorry, I guess by criticizing him I just fell into the criteria of "criticizing like an unsuccessful person", funny how he's set this up so that if you question it, you meet the negatively connoted standards he's describing and thus are barred from being able to input any sort of criticism. Almost like it's a biased fallacy or something...

Oh and, before someone interjects, I'd like to point out that I'm "successful in league" by the way, I am a multiple time diamond player. I also don't disagree with all of the analogies the author puts forth, but there's no denying it's done from a position of arbitrary subjective biases. Most of this lacks any substance or proof, or anything. It's just generic opinionated click bait designed to feed you a feel good mentality (because most people are going to fall into the successful category for a lot of these images, even though they'll ironically be in positions in life that aren't awfully successful) while writing everything off as though it's fact, when the majority of it is just pure opinion. Lastly, the unfortunate--or maybe ideal, **depending on one's perspective, ** reality of the world is that being an honorable wholesome person, as described by the tropes this source pedals, doesn't ensure you any merits of success one way or the other, you can just as easily be a person who wants others to fail while still living a successful life; but then one has to get involved in the 'debate' of what constitutes success in the first place, which is something the article conveniently doesn't try to strictly define. It's all not very convincing. Sorry.