How to pluralize Singed?

LtPliers·Dec 17, 2014·1 votes·2,218 views

I've always been curious, how to pluralize singed? Come up with your best answer.

Edit: Don't want grammar nazis in this thread. Just want creative ways to pluralize Singed.

25 Comments

ChactoriesDec 17, 20144 votes

I'm pretty sure it's singedingtons

I Feed Top LaneDec 17, 20144 votes

You can't by defenition pluralize Proper Nouns unless used as an adjective in the from of a representative of that noun E.G.

New York City CITIZENS Top Lane MAINS Lee Sin FAGGOTS etc.

You can use 's to add possession to the proper noun though SINGED'S RoA IONIAN'S Champion Roster

Quod Erat Demonstrandum

MahnigguhDec 17, 20141 votes

SINGED'S RoA

not an English major here but pretty sure Singed's is never correct. he is similar to cases that already end in S so it would be Singed' w/o the S. (we are arguing not agreeing)

if you are referring to like having a team full of Singed you would say just that, not "look at all the Singed's." ( we are agreeing not arguing)

The ChinDec 17, 20141 votes

{quoted}

not an English major here but pretty sure Singed's is never correct. he is similar to cases that already end in S so it would be Singed' w/o the S. (we are arguing not agreeing)

if you are referring to like having a team full of Singed you would say just that, not "look at all the Singed's." ( we are agreeing not arguing)

As a guy who took an English course, this is false.

Singed's ROA is correct because 's is not always a contraction for is, it can also be used as a possessive.

For example, lee sin's kick

Does not mean lee sin is kick, it means the kick is his, it comes from him or he owns it.

And to answer the original question in this thread, I would go with "Many Singe" and use a Russian accent :)

MahnigguhDec 17, 20141 votes

...my post must have went over your head. it has to do with the ending of the word... There is no Kass's anything...the correct way to do it would be Kass' Singed would follow the same mechanic. There is no 100% rule that goes either way but try saying Singed' compared to Singed's. Most people would rather just say him or his to avoid his name altogether

KillstradoDec 17, 20141 votes

For one Kassidins, for two passes is the plural for more than one pass like hall passes so you can get back to your English class because you must have failed it

MahnigguhDec 17, 20141 votes

Some writers and editors add ‘s to every proper noun, be it Hastings’s or Jones’s. And there are a few who add only an apostrophe to all nouns ending in s—however, this method is relatively rare, and not recommended here. One method, common in newspapers and magazines, is to add an apostrophe plus s (-’s) to common nouns ending in s, but only a stand-alone apostrophe to proper nouns ending in s

Nope just one of the few who was taught this and apparently ever taken to it...i though it was the only way so i admit defeat...

KillstradoDec 18, 20141 votes

an apostrophe is for possessives not god damn pluralizations, what the fuck do you guys not get about that quit trying to sound smart you're all wrong

The ChinDec 17, 20142 votes

{quoted}

...my post must have went over your head. it has to do with the ending of the word... There is no Kass's anything...the correct way to do it would be Kass' Singed would follow the same mechanic. There is no 100% rule that goes either way but try saying Singed' compared to Singed's. Most people would rather just say him or his to avoid his name altogether

Correct, but Singed's name doesn't end with an S so that doesn't apply.

I think the reason "Singed's" sounds weird is because that's his name. Singe is a normal word, the plural of that word is singes, and singeds isn't a word, however since Singed is his name the possessive version of that would be Singed's.

MahnigguhDec 18, 20141 votes

Fuckin'A that makes sense...good call

KillstradoDec 18, 20141 votes

no one gives a damn about the possessive spelling, we are looking for the PLURAL

The ChinDec 18, 20141 votes

{quoted}

no one gives a damn about the possessive spelling, we are looking for the PLURAL

some other guy was talking about it

LtPliersDec 17, 20142 votes

Please stay on task guys, just want creative and fun ways to pluralize Singed.

Chaotic ReksDec 17, 20142 votes

what pisses me off is: I don't know if that's his name or if that's what happened to him... therefor it makes it both a noun and an adjective? nounjective?

treekiller246Dec 17, 20142 votes

One word Vi.

redniwediSDec 17, 20141 votes

I always skirt around it, saying things like Singed players so I don't have to deal with it.

KillstradoDec 17, 20141 votes

Singedes Singeds Singedians, I got it Assholes... No wait that's the guys that have to correct you and say there's no way to pluralize it because they don't like whimsy or imagination.......and they don't like to party

TerraeclipseDec 17, 20141 votes

Such rude. Much Toxic.

Singedulations.

FarRockBFDec 17, 20141 votes

Singers (pronounced: Sin-jers)

Drunk RummateDec 18, 20141 votes

its not grammatically correct to pluralize a proper noun to begin with

so just say it however you want i guess.

EphamenneDec 20, 20141 votes

{quoted}

I've always been curious, how to pluralize singed? Come up with your best answer.

Edit: Don't want grammar nazis in this thread. Just want creative ways to pluralize Singed.

I personally would say just his name if I were referring to a pack of him. If I were talking about a group of Singed players or just the champion in a general conversation I would just refer to them as Singed, and I would do the same with champions with names ending in an "S" or "ing" following the trend of Singed's name ending in an "ed."

An example using the current Snowdown event: "All of the Singed in their snow-day skins have become a common sight."

Saying that all of the "Singeds in their snow-day skins" would sound a bit strange and would be even stranger to say, in spite of potentially having to say "Singed's" when talking about his posessives such as "Singed's ultimate ability..." or his laugh, etc. I imagine most people would be inclined to say something along the lines of "The ultimate ability of Singed..." as opposed to "Singed's ultimate ability..." and thus when talking about a multiple of Singed I imagine one would simply refer to the multiple as Singed, again using "All of the Singed..." as an example.

I hope this helps; Please keep in mind I am not any sort of language expert.

7ha7guy777Dec 20, 20141 votes

we could treat him like "moose" and "sheep" and simply use the singular as the plural. but that wouldn't be fun... how about a "Trail of Singed"?

EphamenneDec 20, 20141 votes

Looks like you had the same thought as me. You were just able to convey it in a simpler way. I envy that talent. Either way, I agree with you 100%

{quoted}

I personally would say just his name if I were referring to a pack of him. If I were talking about a group of Singed players or just the champion in a general conversation I would just refer to them as Singed, and I would do the same with champions with names ending in an "S" or "ing" following the trend of Singed's name ending in an "ed."

An example using the current Snowdown event: "All of the Singed in their snow-day skins have become a common sight."

Saying that all of the "Singeds in their snow-day skins" would sound a bit strange and would be even stranger to say, in spite of potentially having to say "Singed's" when talking about his posessives such as "Singed's ultimate ability..." or his laugh, etc. I imagine most people would be inclined to say something along the lines of "The ultimate ability of Singed..." as opposed to "Singed's ultimate ability..." and thus when talking about a multiple of Singed I imagine one would simply refer to the multiple as Singed, again using "All of the Singed..." as an example.

I hope this helps; Please keep in mind I am not any sort of language expert.