I gotta say i'm disappointed with Akali's line about Kayn
With her appearance I was hoping I could at least pretend that she was a lesbian like me. Oh well, maybe she's bi.
35 Comments
why champs must be distinguished for their sexual preferences? i dont get it, we are talking about akali being a badass ninja, not a manifester of social rights...
[sg-lux-2]
"This champion looks like a lesbian so I'm very disappointed that she isn't a lesbian because I am a lesbian"
[sg-lux-2]
Yeah what about no? I'm probably gonna get a ban for saying this but being lesbian is a hormonal dereglation which is very rare so why would we need more characters to show that it exists? Varus is enough.
"Man, I am so disappointed.. -What happend? This rework has a different sexual preference then I wanted it to have... -.........." You think this example is stupid? Good, because that is what you said. Look through what you said and think about it.
keep sjw shit out of league. if a champ is gay wtf does that have to do with anything. sjw's were a mistake
Varus is probably gonna be the token gay guy (that is, if they haven't changed his lore already)
Why does this matter so much to you.
With your logic I should be labeling champs as disappointing because they are not Latino.
And Latinos are a larger group than the entirety of the lbgt group.
You are looking at a facet of a characterization and treating it like the main charactarization.
Yeah what about no? I'm probably gonna get a ban for saying this but being lesbian is a hormonal dereglation which is very rare so why would we need more characters to show that it exists? Varus is enough.
Yeah what about no? I'm probably gonna get a ban for saying this but being lesbian is a hormonal dereglation which is very rare so why would we need more characters to show that it exists? Varus is enough.
did you just assume akali's gender?
Yeah what about no? I'm probably gonna get a ban for saying this but being lesbian is a hormonal dereglation which is very rare so why would we need more characters to show that it exists? Varus is enough.
Personally love that she’s acknowledged another Champion’s attractiveness. We’ve got a ton of attractive Champs, yet it’s rarely pointed out in anyone’s VO.
While you’re allowed to be disappointed that a character doesn’t share your sexuality, Akali was not the right choice for introducing a lesbian champ. Also, you’re basing her sexuality off her appearance? As a cis, hetero, white person, I would get absolutely roasted for ever assuming someone was lesbian cos of the way they look.
It’s really annoyed me on how some people are so distinguished about the particular subject it really doesn’t matter to me tho but ty for sharing
I mean she still can see who hot even if she is not into boys
I mean she still can see who hot even if she is not into boys
I mean she still can see who hot even if she is not into boys
(Deleted for lag post)
It's just a game with fictional characters and lore. Riot already catered to the LGBT+ community with Varus and besides, isn't Vi rumored to be a lesbian anyway? We got Kindred that can be counted genderfluid I guess...man, just move along, sis.
It's just a game with fictional characters and lore. Riot already catered to the LGBT+ community with Varus and besides, isn't Vi rumored to be a lesbian anyway? We got Kindred that can be counted genderfluid I guess...man, just move along, sis.
-
Just cause she said he's hot doesn't make her straight. I think my best friend is hot AF and I'm straight.
-
Why does she NEED to be bisexual for you?
You got so many other champions that could be potentially lesbian/bi that you could proudly related to: Taric, Vi, Leona, Diana, Varus, Cait, Fiora, etc so why are you after Akali? I am happy that Akali is straight.