Skip to content

Things in Fiora's lore that need explaining

All Might Jr··15 votes·3,912 views
  1. So is compulsory military no longer a part of Demacian culture? Why was this changed when the lore, splash arts, and just about everything has been implying that Demacia is beset on all fronts while also beginning a new war with Noxus. It makes no real sense that someone would want their daughter to play with dolls and dresses if they were destined for the army.

  2. Is the old meteorcratic system of ranking changed to a patriarchy? If so (WHY). Why take the city-state that has more women representing it then men, women who are trained, professional soldiers and warriors, women with agency and backstories, and completely diminish their power in the setting? Why do this with DEMACIA? I get it, grey and grey and grey and no black and white and blah blah, but why make them so utterly archaeic in comparison to their old lore selves? Especially when they have been getting the shaft in nearly every event, none of their characters being able to do anything with impact without getting fucked over by Noxus or someone else? They haven't had a clear victory in ages, just ties and losses.

  3. Is Demacia now going to become unbearably draconic? Where an entire family is exiled due to one man's crime? Where a woman has no right to refuse a suitor? Where everything is settled with duels to the death? Is the constitutional monarchy that used to be in place gone? I had this very real concern a while ago when Ekko came out and I could see that they wanted to muddle up the morality of the setting. And I was guessing that they were going to give Demacia some new fatal flaw. But I didn't think they would completely re-write their culture to do so.

All in all I'm very, VERY unhappy with the changes made to Demacia. This isn't "grey", especially considering how misogyny is viewed today. This is an unrepentant splash of black taking over sensible established lore.

I'd really like a Rioter to explain the decision here. I'm fine with Demacia being grey, but retconning their noble and optimistic system where your ability decided your destiny, rather than birth or gender into a samey and needlessly generic patriarchy.

43 Comments

Dreamspitter13 votes

[{quoted}](name=Of Gent Intent,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=,timestamp=2015-10-09T05:39:15.121+0000)

  1. Is Demacia now going to become unbearably draconic? Where an entire family is exiled due to one man's crime?

"Nobody is innocent, there are merely varying levels of guilt"

[{quoted}](name=Of Gent Intent,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=,timestamp=2015-10-09T05:39:15.121+0000)

Where everything is settled with duels to the death?

"By their deaths you shall know them."

[{quoted}](name=Of Gent Intent,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=,timestamp=2015-10-09T05:39:15.121+0000)

Is the constitutional monarchy that used to be in place gone? I had this very real concern a while ago when Ekko came out and I could see that they wanted to muddle up the morality of the setting. And I was guessing that they were going to give Demacia some new fatal flaw. But I didn't think they would completely re-write their culture to do so.

#IN THE GRIM DARKNESS OF THE FUTURE...

http://i.imgur.com/rgg81Te.jpg

UomoAfide1 votes

"There is no peace amongst the stars, only an eternity of carnage and slaughter, and the laughter of the thirsting gods"

All Might Jr3 votes

{quoted}

"Nobody is innocent, there are merely varying levels of guilt"

"By their deaths you shall know them."

#IN THE GRIM DARKNESS OF THE FUTURE...

http://i.imgur.com/rgg81Te.jpg

That comparison is so fucked because even the Imperium is Egalitarian as fuck because it's literally "humanity vs every god awful thing that crawls, walks, slithers, and flies in the galaxy". Which is what Demacia has been set up for as a while so this misogyny doesn't make SENSE.

Narasimha2 votes

Actually, it was implied that humanity was headed down the darker path even before every major faction started gearing up for war. Even during the time of the Emperor, it was rapidly changing from chaos to forced order.

Dreamspitter1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Of Gent Intent,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=00030001,timestamp=2015-10-09T17:04:46.824+0000)

That comparison is so fucked because even the Imperium is Egalitarian as fuck because it's literally "humanity vs every god awful thing that crawls, walks, slithers, and flies in the galaxy". Which is what Demacia has been set up for as a while so this misogyny doesn't make SENSE.

Except it isnt.

Well...I suppose if you work on the presumption that EVERYONE (but the few) are equally SHIT space peasants under Nobility, and Planetary Governors/Lords then...yeah. I guess they are.

That aside, while everyone serves....not nearly as many females as males serve the Imperium militarily (and that MUST happen for a reason). The Imperial Guardsmen have many different traditions among their regiments but women make up very few of them (well Cadia might be different). Likewise there are few female Inquisitors. Space Marines can** only** be male (but that's nothing to do with culture). Yes, there are the Adepta Sororitas -how they formed in a funny story. Officially though, the Ecclesiarchy isnt supposed to have "men under arms", but since it uses "men" to refer to humans somebody said "Technically my Lord..." and they weren't disbanded.

http://wh40k.lexicanum.com/mediawiki/images/c/c9/Mira.jpg http://i.imgur.com/7gi17Ub.jpg http://pre01.deviantart.net/c64c/th/pre/i/2015/030/c/4/sister_of_battle_by_fonteart-d8g0c1q.jpg

Now suppose on some Imperial world the daughter of a noble objects to political marriage (and they DO have their politicking), and decides she's going to fight instead. I do think she'd encounter some resistance, but she could do it.

Now if you want to talk egalitarianism....

"Chaos offers power to the ambitious. To some, it offers hope in an unfair world, where justice, wealth and happiness are the prerogatives of a privileged few, and where the only escape from starvation or persecution lies in the egalitarian favours of Chaos - for Chaos judges its servants on merit alone and rewards them accordingly."

  • Realm of Chaos: The Lost and the Damned
Helmight13 votes
  1. So is compulsory military no longer a part of Demacian culture? Why was this changed when the lore, splash arts, and just about everything has been implying that Demacia is beset on all fronts while also beginning a new war with Noxus. It makes no real sense that someone would want their daughter to play with dolls and dresses if they were destined for the army.

Still a part of Demacian culture. Remember that Fiora was a noble - in places like Demacia, I guarantee that nobles pay their way out of their commissions more often than not. I'm also assuming that the "dolls and dresses" part was before she was old enough for compulsory service.

  1. Is the old meteorcratic system of ranking changed to a patriarchy? If so (WHY). Why take the city-state that has more women representing it then men, women who are trained, professional soldiers and warriors, women with agency and backstories, and completely diminish their power in the setting? Why do this with DEMACIA? I get it, grey and grey and grey and no black and white and blah blah, but why make them so utterly archaeic in comparison to their old lore selves? Especially when they have been getting the shaft in nearly every event, none of their characters being able to do anything with impact without getting fucked over by Noxus or someone else? They haven't had a clear victory in ages, just ties and losses.

Demacia never had a meritocracy. They were always ruled by the nobles, and it was always implied that it was a patriarchy. Even if the implication was never there, it fits with what we know about Demacia's hypocritical society and stands as a sharp contrast to Noxus, where anyone can rule if they have power.

Nor has the power of their women decreased. If anything, it's increased because the champions we've seen have had to fight for what they've got against the cultural restrictions.

Everything that has come to light has been completely on par with Demacia of old.

  1. Is Demacia now going to become unbearably draconic? Where an entire family is exiled due to one man's crime? Where a woman has no right to refuse a suitor? Where everything is settled with duels to the death? Is the constitutional monarchy that used to be in place gone? I had this very real concern a while ago when Ekko came out and I could see that they wanted to muddle up the morality of the setting. And I was guessing that they were going to give Demacia some new fatal flaw. But I didn't think they would completely re-write their culture to do so.

Demacia's thing was and has always been "justice - by law, or by sword." If you break laws, you are expected to be punished for them. Having draconic laws makes sense, and at any rate the "one man's crime" was a big deal. Planning to sabotage a duel between nobles is unthinkable, so it makes sense that his entire house would be punished too.

Not everything is settled with duels to the death, but Fiora isn't respected by the men of the court and prefers bladework to politicking anyways. The men believe they can beat her - after all she's "only" a woman - and then get offed. And nobody's learned yet.

Constitutional monarchy's still in place, but they don't have to get involved in every noble spat. That's what the law is for.

All in all I'm very, VERY unhappy with the changes made to Demacia. This isn't "grey", especially considering how misogyny is viewed today. This is an unrepentant splash of black taking over sensible established lore.

It's still grey, mate. Patriarchies are not inherently evil, and the use of the trope here is important for the development of Demacia in contrast to Noxus. And at any rate, Demacia needed way more grey. Noxus was built around a goddamn skull mountain, for Mike's sake - they have evil painted all over them. Demacia meanwhile was golden-haired knights in shining armor with nothing awful about them at all. They needed more to dirty them up, and using something that people nowadays regard as awful is a good way of going about it. The fact that you're this upset about it means that the Riot staff did a good job.

Sneak Dog1 votes

Noxus was built around a goddamn skull mountain, for Mike's sake - they have evil painted all over them. Demacia meanwhile was golden-haired knights in shining armor with nothing awful about them at all.

Ah, I do hope Riot keeps this mental image. It's amazing. I feel it's what Demacia and Noxus ought to look like from a surface-level.

Helmight2 votes

Exactly. Keeping the surface imagery is excellent, but then we need to flesh out the various advantages and disadvantages that both city-states have below the surface. Noxus at first blush looks totally evil, but then you realize that they have a very proud culture in which anyone can rise to power and gain respect. Demacia looks totally good, but then you find out about their child soldiers and their ingrained patriarchy and start to wonder how good they really are.

That's why the lore "change" was good, tbh.

Chromatic Eagle1 votes

Lux's story implied a darkness to Demacia. Instead of going with a military culture, they decided to go with a traditional patriarchy. Someone being upset at the story doesn't mean they did a good job. Not saying they did a bad job either.

All Might Jr6 votes

{quoted}

Still a part of Demacian culture. Remember that Fiora was a noble - in places like Demacia, I guarantee that nobles pay their way out of their commissions more often than not. I'm also assuming that the "dolls and dresses" part was before she was old enough for compulsory service.

But we haven't SEEN that at all. We've seen quite the opposite honestly. Nobles being hauled off without their consent to the army because it's expected of the nobles to give EVERYTHING to Demacia. And even if it was before she was old enough, why would she still have to train in secret? She is simply practicing before her inevitable term in the army. Why would you not want your daughter to be prepared for that?

Demacia never had a meritocracy. They were always ruled by the nobles, and it was always implied that it was a patriarchy. Even if the implication was never there, it fits with what we know about Demacia's hypocritical society and stands as a sharp contrast to Noxus, where anyone can rule if they have power.

Xin Zhao, Poppy, Quinn, Shyvana, hell even GALIO are all given their positions based entirely on merit. The patriarchy was never really implied outside of there being a line of Jarvan Kings, and even then we don't know if that's just because the oldest child was always a son and never a daughter. Also how do you go from "There was always one implied, and if there was never one implied" from sentence to sentence?

And nothing about Demacia has been hypocritical. It's simply zealous and committed to a point of extremism. Their ideals held true but they were very iron-fisted about it and DIDN'T accept hypocrisy.

Nor has the power of their women decreased. If anything, it's increased because the champions we've seen have had to fight for what they've got against the cultural restrictions.

Yet all those women are now in a spot where every single one of their character arcs is going to be about how they fought the patriarchy. I would've been fine had it just been House Laurent, but making EVERY Demacian household work this way takes a lot from all of the characters by making their arcs largely the same.

Everything that has come to light has been completely on par with Demacia of old.

It is most certainly not but okay.

Demacia's thing was and has always been "justice - by law, or by sword." If you break laws, you are expected to be punished for them. Having draconic laws makes sense, and at any rate the "one man's crime" was a big deal. Planning to sabotage a duel between nobles is unthinkable, so it makes sense that his entire house would be punished too.

Draconic laws are fine, but this is OVERLY Draconic. It's like that aspect of the Demacians was ramped up to 11. To be able to murder a woman (and by extension his father since he must take up the duel) because she refused to marry you being ALLOWED in Demacia verily shits on what their image was before this.

Not everything is settled with duels to the death, but Fiora isn't respected by the men of the court and prefers bladework to politicking anyways. The men believe they can beat her - after all she's "only" a woman - and then get offed. And nobody's learned yet.

"Refuse to marry me? DUEL TO THE DEATH!" "Someone in our house committed a crime? DUEL TO THE DEATH!" "Talk shit? DUEL TO THE DEATH!"

And honestly that's still unexplained and random misogyny that has no real place.

Constitutional monarchy's still in place, but they don't have to get involved in every noble spat. That's what the law is for.

Is it? We have no reason to believe this isn't changed. And a reassurance that it is would still be nice considering.

It's still grey, mate. Patriarchies are not inherently evil, and the use of the trope here is important for the development of Demacia in contrast to Noxus. And at any rate, Demacia needed way more grey. Noxus was built around a goddamn skull mountain, for Mike's sake - they have evil painted all over them. Demacia meanwhile was golden-haired knights in shining armor with nothing awful about them at all. They needed more to dirty them up, and using something that people nowadays regard as awful is a good way of going about it. The fact that you're this upset about it means that the Riot staff did a good job.

It's not important to the development of Demacia. Retconning them into misogynists when everything that they stood for before has them as being very egalitarian isn't "developing". It's simply smearing their image uncreatively. Demacia had MANY flaws and the fact that you say this shows how little you're actually being subjective here.

They had incompetence on nearly every level of command. They were surrounded by enemies and creatures, becoming the punching bag of nearly everyone without any chance of retribution. (Cho, Malphite, Kog, Hecarim, Sion, Swain, LeBlanc, Talon, Katarina) They were zealous and overbearing, sending children to be trained and brainwashed into super soldiers. They held judgement on EVERYONE equally, and the Measured Tread is one of the more ominous things written about them. They are isolationist, quick to accuse, overly subjected to authority.

Like they had a host of flaws but were still good, and deserved that because of how fucked over they are in literally piece of lore they show up in. Now they're assholes who are overly ignorant in the face of adversity for no real given reason.

And no, me being this upset that Riot has, in my eyes, fucked up. I'm fine with Demacia having flaws, but I want their previous flaws to be expanded upon rather than their previous positive attributes simply being done away with so that the setting can be more grey.

Mirage Night1 votes

The only compulsory Military are males and those of Magical Capability. Fiora is neither.

Dreamspitter7 votes

[{quoted}](name=Of Gent Intent,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=,timestamp=2015-10-09T05:39:15.121+0000)

  1. Is the old meteorcratic system of ranking changed to a patriarchy? If so (WHY). Why take the city-state that has more women representing it then men, women who are trained, professional soldiers and warriors, women with agency and backstories, and completely diminish their power in the setting? Why do this with DEMACIA? I get it, grey and grey and grey and no black and white and blah blah, but why make them so utterly archaeic in comparison to their old lore selves? Especially when they have been getting the shaft in nearly every event, none of their characters being able to do anything with impact without getting fucked over by Noxus or someone else? They haven't had a clear victory in ages, just ties and losses.

I thought NOXUS was the meritocracy of all meritocracies, where only strength, ability, and skill mattered -not race, class, gender, or who your parents were?

That aside, compulsory service is the reasoning behind Lux's old League judgment and I don't know what's going to happen with that.

All Might Jr2 votes

{quoted}

I thought NOXUS was the meritocracy of all meritocracies, where only strength, ability, and skill mattered -not race, class, gender, or who your parents were?

That aside, compulsory service is the reasoning behind Lux's old League judgment and I don't know what's going to happen with that.

Quinn's still promoted to knighthood, Poppy and Shyvana are promoted to high offices simply based on merit. Both Noxus and Demacia work off a very military focused meritocracy, but a meritocracy nontheless. Just Demacia's was less about being ambitious than it was dutiful.

Sneak Dog3 votes

I think Quinn is rather unique and still doesn't have a high rank (Though she is seen as a hero and admired as such). She is the champion to show the difference between nobility and commoners in Demacia. Shyvana has received the personal gratitude of the crown-prince and is I believe a hot topic in Demacia. Poppy is the yordle diplomat from Bandle City towards Demacia. She doesn't have a Demacian rank.

I believe Demacia has always been portrayed rather rigorous and class-based. Noxus is a meritocracy where everyone is judged based on their merits. Demacia judges people based on their birth, morals/philosophy and then after that their merits.

For example: Demacian nobility get to be commander and all those good leadership ranks, whereas a commonor might get become their assistant or low leadership if they're good and Demacia recognizes that. Noxian nobility would just get fired/demoted from their leadership if they're incompetent and the system isn't being corrupt.

All Might Jr1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Sneak Dog,realm=EUW,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=000200000000,timestamp=2015-10-09T08:39:33.420+0000)

I think Quinn is rather unique and still doesn't have a high rank (Though she is seen as a hero and admired as such). She is the champion to show the difference between nobility and commoners in Demacia. Shyvana has received the personal gratitude of the crown-prince and is I believe a hot topic in Demacia. Poppy is the yordle diplomat from Bandle City towards Demacia. She doesn't have a Demacian rank.

I believe Demacia has always been portrayed rather rigorous and class-based. Noxus is a meritocracy where everyone is judged based on their merits. Demacia judges people based on their birth, morals/philosophy and then after that their merits.

For example: Demacian nobility get to be commander and all those good leadership ranks, whereas a commonor might get become their assistant or low leadership if they're good and Demacia recognizes that. Noxian nobility would just get fired/demoted from their leadership if they're incompetent and the system isn't being corrupt.

Quinn's expressly given a knighthood (or some sort of equivalent commission/rank) after saving the King and tracking down his attempted Killer. She's a noble, and given special operation missions from Jarvan himself. That's pretty high ranking stuff for "Just a commoner", and about on par with what Katarina does despite not even having the "My father trained me from birth to do this thing" thing going for her.

Sneak Dog2 votes

She was given the greatest honours. Was she made a noble though? It's a bit fuzzy, it mentions elite.

Obviously a royal guard or elite squad would be chosen based on merits, even in such a system. She still doesn't really have any leadership role though. It is such roles that I would inspect when investigating how the military ranks work (merit or birth). I feel like these are reserved to nobility.

Narasimha1 votes

Actually, it never says that she was a given a title or any form of nobility. It seems most likely that she was given a medal, or the equivalent of one, and was offered a position at a higher rank. But that's expected. I mean, she brought the King's assassin to justice. That's not really a meritocracy by itself.

Valaran Nara6 votes

The thing about the patriarchy...it was always there.

Fiora was head of a house because she had to take her honor back. Even in her old lore was it suggested that her ability to be at the top was purely because of birthrites. She ahd to FIGHT for them.

Lux's position doesn't even have power. She was forced into the military because her BROTHER was famous and a great soldier, and they wanted their daughter to not seem useless, so they tried to fashion her like him.

Vayne is the head of her house because she's the only one LEFT in it.

Shyvana is an outcast and made it in because JARVAN gave her a chance.

Quinn has her position because she proved her merit DESPITE being female.

Demacia was always a patriarchy. They just had more female champions.

Chromatic Eagle4 votes

I'd have to reread Fiora's lore, but I think her being at the top because of birth doesn't equal gender roles. Fighting for them doesn't necessarily mean gender roles either.

Lux's family also served in the military. That doesn't equal sexism.

Vayne's story doesn't really explain what she had to go through to maintain being the head, but that doesn't have to include sexism.

That is true with Shyvana, but that felt more because of her being a half-dragon than a woman.

Quinn wasn't a noble. Demacian could've had a classicism problem rather than a sexist one.

Demacia wasn't bluntly sexist, and only vaguely sexist. Feels weird to make them the sexist nation compared to Noxus (Katarina), Bilgewater (Ms. Fortune), or even Freljord (Ashe and Sejuani).

All Might Jr4 votes

[{quoted}](name=Valaran Nara,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=0004,timestamp=2015-10-09T08:07:09.184+0000)

The thing about the patriarchy...it was always there.

Fiora was head of a house because she had to take her honor back. Even in her old lore was it suggested that her ability to be at the top was purely because of birthrites. She ahd to FIGHT for them.

Lux's position doesn't even have power. She was forced into the military because her BROTHER was famous and a great soldier, and they wanted their daughter to not seem useless, so they tried to fashion her like him.

Vayne is the head of her house because she's the only one LEFT in it.

Shyvana is an outcast and made it in because JARVAN gave her a chance.

Quinn has her position because she proved her merit DESPITE being female.

Demacia was always a patriarchy. They just had more female champions.

Sona's adopted mother was also the head of her house, and no it wasn't a patriarchy because that's STILL 2 women being the heads of houses compared to a confirmed 1, which is Big Papa Jarvan. We don't know who between the Crownguards is Master but they seem to have equal footing from Lux's judgement. Also Quinn proved herself despite being a COMMONER, which is what her lore was originally about.

You've also completely ignored Poppy in this post.

Narasimha1 votes

Sona's adopted mother was also the head of her house, and no it wasn't a patriarchy because that's STILL 2 women being the heads of houses compared to a confirmed 1, which is Big Papa Jarvan.

Where did you get this from? Literally all it says is that Sona's mother was wealthy. It doesn't mean or even imply that she was the head of a noble house, just that she had access to a good deal of wealth.

Overlord Forte3 votes

The patriarchy implications in Fiora's expanded lore do need some light shed on them. I've taken to understanding them as something done by the 'noble houses', but the implications are far reaching in their society. It's a really dirty shotgun blast that can hit a lot of characters and not make it pretty in the process.

Dreamspitter1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Overlord Forte,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=0000,timestamp=2015-10-09T05:41:49.677+0000)

The patriarchy implications in Fiora's expanded lore do need some light shed on them. I've taken to understanding them as something done by the 'noble houses', but the implications are far reaching in their society. It's a really dirty shotgun blast that can hit a lot of characters and not make it pretty in the process.

In what fashion?

Overlord Forte4 votes

You have to immediately start doing damage control on pretty much every Demacian direct and indirect character. An overtone of female inferiority begins to cloud over every character's interaction, thus the mind begins to wonder.

  • Why does JarvanIV Jarvan have Shyvana Shyvana in his elite guard? Why would someone who was persecuted her entire life for being a half breed live in a place to be persecuted for being a woman?

  • How much is Lux Luxanna onboard with 'every good girl has her place'? Secret rebel, or cultural enforcer? I mean, she might be quite upset with Fiora Fiora's stubborn independence. Luxanna's own influence is not insignificant - she can throw political weight around.

  • Garen Garen may or may not be someone who earnestly believes women have a place to be in life. What then with his character relationship with Katarina Katarina?

  • Kayle Kayle's supreme celestial(?) power and a woman ... that might just really gouge at the sensibilities of Demacians, no?

  • Since Yordles tend to be the butt of a lot of stigmatism, Poppy Poppy must really be double dipping on the persecution.

  • JarvanIV XinZhao Garen XinZhao so how exactly DO they treat women? Demacian cultural norm? Outliers more in line with our (us players) sentiments?

Patriarchy and misogyny are problems that have historically plagued our world and they are intensely volatile subjects. It's not something to be avoided for fear of in general, but one to be handled with full understanding of the scope it impacts the world. The above questions are just a few hard, earnest thoughts that will radically color how we understand characters. Thus, my remark of a shotgun blast: it hits everything and it will make things ugly.

I'm quite curious at how they want to go with this road.

Dreamspitter1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Overlord Forte,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=000000000000,timestamp=2015-10-09T15:28:11.293+0000)

You have to immediately start doing damage control on pretty much every Demacian direct and indirect character. An overtone of female inferiority begins to cloud over every character's interaction, thus the mind begins to wonder.

  • Why does JarvanIV Jarvan have Shyvana Shyvana in his elite guard? Why would someone who was persecuted her entire life for being a half breed live in a place to be persecuted for being a woman?

  • How much is Lux Luxanna onboard with 'every good girl has her place'? Secret rebel, or cultural enforcer? I mean, she might be quite upset with Fiora Fiora's stubborn independence. Luxanna's own influence is not insignificant - she can throw political weight around.

  • Garen Garen may or may not be someone who earnestly believes women have a place to be in life. What then with his character relationship with Katarina Katarina?

  • Kayle Kayle's supreme celestial(?) power and a woman ... that might just really gouge at the sensibilities of Demacians, no?

  • Since Yordles tend to be the butt of a lot of stigmatism, Poppy Poppy must really be double dipping on the persecution.

  • JarvanIV XinZhao Garen XinZhao so how exactly DO they treat women? Demacian cultural norm? Outliers more in line with our (us players) sentiments?

Patriarchy and misogyny are problems that have historically plagued our world and they are intensely volatile subjects. It's not something to be avoided for fear of in general, but one to be handled with full understanding of the scope it impacts the world. The above questions are just a few hard, earnest thoughts that will radically color how we understand characters. Thus, my remark of a shotgun blast: it hits everything and it will make things ugly.

I'm quite curious at how they want to go with this road.

#Well let's be honest. They could have avoided all of this.

Let's ask Ed Greenwood (Faerun) . Somebody asked him about sexuality (LGBTQ) within the Forgotten Realms, and WORD OF GOD IS - sexuality and gender are fluid, and NO ONE has ever faced any prejudice over it. Ever. (and his writing seems to support such)

In 'my' Realms, there's no stigma attached to homosexual relationships, only to any sexual behaviour that involves exploiting children, and any sexual behaviour that involves force or coercion (please note: WILLINGLY undergoing pain or bondage doesn't count).-Ed Greenwood

GG easy.

Rito could have done the same exact thing, and simply had misogyny not exist. Now, while I can accept sorcerors, and undead, and celestial beings, and hextech....it'd just be kind of weird if humanity or a whole setting had been purged of a negative aspect of culture altogether. I can suspend disbelief of a lot of things, but it would just be kind of weird to imagine a pseudo-medieval culture that somehow avoided all this (it'd be easier to believe Piltover or another state had)/

This is going to be interesting.

Overlord Forte3 votes

They could have avoided this, and it's usually policy to do so - unless you have a statement to make. Hence why this one kind of blindsided me, it's the tip of a spear.

Worth noting that misogyny has its roots in ancient gender roles that spawned from our biology. "Men are more physically fit than women" and so forth. This purely genetic/biological difference becomes severely mitigated by the existence of something like magic. Suddenly, physical prowess is not so relevant when someone can sling liquid death - or transform into a bloody dragon.

You'd be looking more at 'ordinary peasants vs mage overlords' dynamics, then, because THAT'S where the power struggle exists. I don't think humanity would have purged negative prejudice like this, per say, but it would definitely exist in a much different form.

Dreamspitter1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Overlord Forte,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=00000000000000000000,timestamp=2015-10-09T22:19:26.852+0000)

They could have avoided this, and it's usually policy to do so - unless you have a statement to make. Hence why this one kind of blindsided me, it's the tip of a spear.

Worth noting that misogyny has its roots in ancient gender roles that spawned from our biology. "Men are more physically fit than women" and so forth. This purely genetic/biological difference becomes severely mitigated by the existence of something like magic.

I actually read it most likely all started with farming.

Suddenly, physical prowess is not so relevant when someone can sling liquid death - or transform into a bloody dragon.

You'd be looking more at 'ordinary peasants vs mage overlords' dynamics, then, because THAT'S where the power struggle exists. I don't think humanity would have purged negative prejudice like this, per say, but it would definitely exist in a much different form.

Well even in the modern world, how much does physique matter when someone can sling copper jacketed death?

That aside makes me think of Linear Warrior vs Quadratic Wizard....

Overlord Forte2 votes

I'm not familiar with the farming theory, admittedly.

Physique matters in the modern world in terms of attrition and raw carrying capacity. This is a big issue with the US military right now and people pushing for equality. Women aren't finishing nearly as well in the same rigorous physical trials as men - the standards by which the army conducts war. For them the matter is wholly practical: if a woman at her peak physical cannot carry the same weight as a man in the same state, then it is a potential battlefield liability.

In terms of raw death dealing, though, both can field guns and other armaments in relatively the same capacity. We're getting there with technology, since aptitude in wielding said technology is more important. As we finally break into cybernetics and human augmentation, physical differences will come down to whoever adapts to that best.

Dreamspitter1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Overlord Forte,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=0000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2015-10-10T01:23:01.802+0000)

I'm not familiar with the farming theory, admittedly.

Physique matters in the modern world in terms of attrition and raw carrying capacity. This is a big issue with the US military right now and people pushing for equality. Women aren't finishing nearly as well in the same rigorous physical trials as men - the standards by which the army conducts war. For them the matter is wholly practical: if a woman at her peak physical cannot carry the same weight as a man in the same state, then it is a potential battlefield liability.

In terms of raw death dealing, though, both can field guns and other armaments in relatively the same capacity. We're getting there with technology, since aptitude in wielding said technology is more important. As we finally break into cybernetics and human augmentation, physical differences will come down to whoever adapts to that best.

Here's one view of it

http://www.voxeu.org/article/modern-gender-roles-and-ancient-farming

I'll see if I can dig up some of the others I've read.

But in general what I've read proposes as society transitions from hunting and gathering, and moves deeper into agriculture women have less rights and more gendered responsibilities.

http://www.theguardian.com/science/2015/may/14/early-men-women-equal-scientists

Mark Dyble, an anthropologist who led the study at University College London, said: “There is still this wider perception that hunter-gatherers are more macho or male-dominated. We’d argue it was only with the emergence of agriculture, when people could start to accumulate resources, that inequality emerged.”

Dyble says the latest findings suggest that equality between the sexes may have been a survival advantage and played an important role in shaping human society and evolution. “Sexual equality is one of a important suite of changes to social organisation, including things like pair-bonding, our big, social brains, and language, that distinguishes humans,” he said. “It’s an important one that hasn’t really been highlighted before.”

--

Some researchers think that the dawning of agriculture may mark the transition to markedly different roles for men and women. Archaeologist Ian Hodder reports that at the 9000-year-old site of Çatalhöyük, in south-central Turkey . . . there is little evidence of gender differences. Families were small and men and men and women performed similar chores in daily life, had similar status and power, and both played key roles in social and religious life. Scholars think that after the development of agriculture, as wealth and property became more important in human society, a concern with family lines of descent and inheritance emerged, which led in turn to the idea that women's bodies needed to be controlled so as to prevent them becoming pregnant by more than one man and thus confusing lines of inheritance.

    • Lydia and Alex Pulsipher, World Regional Geography: Global Patterns, Local Lives [without subregions], 4th ed., New York: W.H. Freeman, 2008, ISBN 978-0-7167-8522-4
Overlord Forte1 votes

Hmm, I can see the line of reasoning. A similar strain of thought is what dictates marriage: clear inheritance, transference of property, and other legally-binding activities. The popular notion of marrying for love is a relatively recent (few centuries?) occurrence.

Given the conditions of ancient humanity (pre-agriculture), it does make sense for both to be relatively equal. Not only are our population numbers minuscule, the lack of support systems means every able bodied human matters significantly. Amusingly, this is in line with my observation that, as convenience arises and danger decreases, we become privy to habits not afforded in Darwinian survival.

Social justice movements, for instance, very popular - not something that would exist in those ancient times. If agriculture is the root cause, then perhaps the situation is not so immutable. I've my concerns about 'battlefield viability' as I mentioned above, but greater powers than I are investigating that. The military is ever lovely in finding what works and using it.

Thank you for the links.

Dreamspitter1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Overlord Forte,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=000000000000000000000000000000000000,timestamp=2015-10-12T16:48:15.206+0000)

Hmm, I can see the line of reasoning. A similar strain of thought is what dictates marriage: clear inheritance, transference of property, and other legally-binding activities. The popular notion of marrying for love is a relatively recent (few centuries?) occurrence.

Given the conditions of ancient humanity (pre-agriculture), it does make sense for both to be relatively equal. Not only are our population numbers minuscule, the lack of support systems means every able bodied human matters significantly. Amusingly, this is in line with my observation that, as convenience arises and danger decreases, we become privy to habits not afforded in Darwinian survival.

Social justice movements, for instance, very popular - not something that would exist in those ancient times. If agriculture is the root cause, then perhaps the situation is not so immutable. I've my concerns about 'battlefield viability' as I mentioned above, but greater powers than I are investigating that. The military is ever lovely in finding what works and using it.

Thank you for the links.

What do you think of this video?

http://www.smithsonianchannel.com/shows/samurai-warrior-queens/0/3420808

Overlord Forte1 votes

History is spotted with instances like this, usually moments of extreme pragmatism in situations of dire need (thus removing social constructs). This loops into the Darwinian observation I remark on earlier: it only matters who survives, everything else is window dressing. In holistic terms, from an outside observer's view point, you only need as much as required to get the job done.

My last post's few lines are essentially me being 'I think men and women are on equal footing, but so many people fight about that, I don't have the capability to see accurately'. It very well could be a case of 'social design has limited a viable path', or 'there are practical (non-social designed) reasons to not pursue this option'.

DragonShea3 votes

Demacia is getting it's dark side exposed It's about time it happened. Noxus as always being portrayed as the stereotypical bad guys but now it's all getting evened out. One also have to consider that Jarvin4 May be a maverick and doesn't care much about the ridge laws, especially since he helped Quinn with her crossbow. J4 may on the way of reforming Demacia but I don't think that it's noticeable yet, or else he is bending the rules to suit him. I Don't know. It's rather ambiguous right now.

Jeddy0171 votes

Come on Jaredan & the lore people!This is released content.You guys should be willing to talk about this.

Dreamspitter2 votes

{quoted}

Come on Jaredan & the lore people!This is released content.You guys should be willing to talk about this.

It's been an hour.

GreenLore1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Of Gent Intent,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=,timestamp=2015-10-09T05:39:15.121+0000)

  1. So is compulsory military no longer a part of Demacian culture? Why was this changed when the lore, splash arts, and just about everything has been implying that Demacia is beset on all fronts while also beginning a new war with Noxus. It makes no real sense that someone would want their daughter to play with dolls and dresses if they were destined for the army.

Maybe nobles(or women) are an exception here? I mean Fiora was more or less raised to be a tool for political marriage,so it wouldn't surprise me if noble women like that could be an exception.

The compulsory military always made little sense to me,I mean does Sona look like she was/is going to the military?Quinns lore also sounds more like she joined willingly. Though they might have compulsory military services in times of dire need.

  1. Is the old meteorcratic system of ranking changed to a patriarchy? If so (WHY). Why take the city-state that has more women representing it then men, women who are trained, professional soldiers and warriors, women with agency and backstories, and completely diminish their power in the setting? Why do this with DEMACIA? I get it, grey and grey and grey and no black and white and blah blah, but why make them so utterly archaeic in comparison to their old lore selves? Especially when they have been getting the shaft in nearly every event, none of their characters being able to do anything with impact without getting fucked over by Noxus or someone else? They haven't had a clear victory in ages, just ties and losses.

While demacia has many female champs,how many of those are actually in some kind of leader position?Right the only one is Fiora. Vayne is the head of her house because everyone else is dead,Sona is a noble,but not in the military,quinn might be exceptionally skillfull,but still has a rather low rank,shyvana is in a similar position. The only other woman who has some kind of political status is poppy who is an ambassador. Its not that they see women as simply inferior,just that women are usually not seen as leader figures and that sometimes noble women are supposed to be married off to an influental suitor.

  1. Is Demacia now going to become unbearably draconic? Where an entire family is exiled due to one man's crime? Where a woman has no right to refuse a suitor? Where everything is settled with duels to the death? Is the constitutional monarchy that used to be in place gone? I had this very real concern a while ago when Ekko came out and I could see that they wanted to muddle up the morality of the setting. And I was guessing that they were going to give Demacia some new fatal flaw. But I didn't think they would completely re-write their culture to do so.

Demacia was always said to be rather draconic when it came to stuff like honor and justice,its just that this was always kind of an informed attribute of them that we never saw in the lore. While I agree that a whole noble family getting exiled for one incident is kinda over the top,it was already a part in fioras old lore that duels to the death are not an uncommon way to handle these things.(Fiora herself threatened to kill her father in the old lore)

All in all I'm very, VERY unhappy with the changes made to Demacia. This isn't "grey", especially considering how misogyny is viewed today. This is an unrepentant splash of black taking over sensible established lore.

Now you are seeing the world in a black&white view. Yes Demacias system isn't all good,but just because there is some bad stuff in it doesn't mean the whole country is suddenly evil. Grey happens if you mix black&white.

I'd really like a Rioter to explain the decision here. I'm fine with Demacia being grey, but retconning their noble and optimistic system where your ability decided your destiny, rather than birth or gender into a samey and needlessly generic patriarchy.

Uhm what? This was never the case in demacia(except for the gender roles) I mean seriously thats the one thing that has always been criticized about demacia,that your birth determines what you can become and what not. All the generals(and I guess also all the knights) in demacia are nobles,while everyone who isn't a noble has no chance of becoming a general. Thats pretty much the one thing where noxus is the nicer city state,because in the noxian military your skill is the important thing,not your lineage.

Neamean1 votes

Good reply to OP question but how can you forget about the Lady of Luminosity :P. I think she is different though her family is much closer to the crown and they are the main branch of the crownguard, her family had more expectation for her rather then making her a pawn for marriage. Not only that she is a talented sorceress which can be more reason to not use her as political marriage but use her for military purpose.

Also I just realize why Fiora is rival with Lux. Lux is treated better then Fiora. Fiora has always been belittle because she was a girl but Lux has always been given respect.

GreenLore1 votes

Yeah i also think it might be because the crownguard family is simply a bit closer to the crown already. Alternatively it is possible that the parents of garen and lux simply have a different view on demacia and focus more on the military aspect than bothering about making their family more influential.

All Might Jr3 votes

{quoted}

Maybe nobles(or women) are an exception here? I mean Fiora was more or less raised to be a tool for political marriage,so it wouldn't surprise me if noble women like that could be an exception.

This is something I'd liked explain. If so does this mean that Lux is a special case? Along with Quinn? And is this just so they don't have to draw women getting eaten in Splash arts along with all the other Demacian soldiers?

The compulsory military always made little sense to me,I mean does Sona look like she was/is going to the military?Quinns lore also sounds more like she joined willingly. Though they might have compulsory military services in times of dire need.

It made a LOT of sense. Demacia's constantly beset by shit like Brand, Cho'Gath, Kog'maw, Malphite apparently, Sion, Swain, LB... They're constantly surrounded by danger, so it makes a lot of sense that they MUST bolster their forces with conscriptions.

Also the military does not imply direct fighting. Sona could've gone 2 years as a healer or a morale-raising performer. There's a lot to do in an army.

While demacia has many female champs,how many of those are actually in some kind of leader position?Right the only one is Fiora. Vayne is the head of her house because everyone else is dead,Sona is a noble,but not in the military,quinn might be exceptionally skillfull,but still has a rather low rank,shyvana is in a similar position. The only other woman who has some kind of political status is poppy who is an ambassador. Its not that they see women as simply inferior,just that women are usually not seen as leader figures and that sometimes noble women are supposed to be married off to an influental suitor.

Sona's mother, and if the implication in Sona's lore is that her mother died without leaving any heirs, then Sona herself even though she is an ADOPTED IONIAN WOMAN, is the leader of House Buvelle.

And it's very implied that Quinn is risen to the ranks of nobility similar to Knighthood, and there's nothing else stating that the nobility keeps people from joining their ranks this way. The most we get is Quinn's village telling her it's too lofty a goal and that there were those in the Military who thought that Quinn lacked the proper training.

Also this isn't a "sometimes women are married off", the lore expressly states that being married off is a noblewoman's ONLY PURPOSE.

Demacia was always said to be rather draconic when it came to stuff like honor and justice,its just that this was always kind of an informed attribute of them that we never saw in the lore. While I agree that a whole noble family getting exiled for one incident is kinda over the top,it was already a part in fioras old lore that duels to the death are not an uncommon way to handle these things.(Fiora herself threatened to kill her father in the old lore) Now you are seeing the world in a black&white view. Yes Demacias system isn't all good,but just because there is some bad stuff in it doesn't mean the whole country is suddenly evil. Grey happens if you mix black&white.

"Rather" Draconic does not mean "Your entire family is exiled from Demacia for one crime, and I challenge a woman to a duel to the death because she refused to marry me".

And I'm not, had you read the end of my post. This isn't making Demacia "grey" by simply retconning what made them good in the first place with no explanation as to why. Demacia was always grey because of implied Xenophobia, zealotry, CHILD SOLDIER BRAINWASHING, and their "everyone is equal under Justice" applying harsh but fair punishments to even minor offences.

This is taking an aspect of them that made them optimistic and good and simply erasing it in favor of a more cliche system of government for no given reason.

Uhm what? This was never the case in demacia(except for the gender roles) I mean seriously thats the one thing that has always been criticized about demacia,that your birth determines what you can become and what not. All the generals(and I guess also all the knights) in demacia are nobles,while everyone who isn't a noble has no chance of becoming a general. Thats pretty much the one thing where noxus is the nicer city state,because in the noxian military your skill is the important thing,not your lineage.

Quinn expressly proves that you can rise from peasantry to Knighthood, Xin Zhao isn't even Demacian and he's the right hand of the King, Poppy and Shyvana are raised to high station completely based on merit. Also the ONLY three generals we've seen are Garen, Jarvan, and the unnamed one in Hecarim's lore. And we don't even know if HE'S a noble.

Demacia has always been a meritocracy, but a more controlled and orderly one that rewarded duty, not ambition. One might take YEARS to rise the ranks to knighthood or above, but they can do so without murdering any of their superiors. Noxus you can do in a month before you're offed by the one below you.

GreenLore1 votes

[{quoted}](name=Of Gent Intent,realm=NA,application-id=6kFXY1kR,discussion-id=o7Rb3tbI,comment-id=00060001,timestamp=2015-10-09T17:00:42.022+0000)

It made a LOT of sense. Demacia's constantly beset by shit like Brand, Cho'Gath, Kog'maw, Malphite apparently, Sion, Swain, LB... They're constantly surrounded by danger, so it makes a lot of sense that they MUST bolster their forces with conscriptions.

Also the military does not imply direct fighting. Sona could've gone 2 years as a healer or a morale-raising performer. There's a lot to do in an army.

Demacia is also seen as one of the biggest military forces on the continent,so I doubt that many are eager to fight against them. Also you talk about beings like brand and Kog'Maw like they are some army destroying forces,but I doubt that this is the case(I also wouldn't draw any conclusions from the splash arts of cho'gath and maplhite),I mean Brand was captured rather easily in the old lore.

Also this isn't a "sometimes women are married off", the lore expressly states that being married off is a noblewoman's ONLY PURPOSE.

Fioras lore mentions that she was going to be married off,because she was the youngest daughter of the house,meaning that the older ones might get a bit more freedom in that regard. It doesn't say anything about this being true for all noblewomen.

"Rather" Draconic does not mean "Your entire family is exiled from Demacia for one crime, and I challenge a woman to a duel to the death because she refused to marry me".

And I'm not, had you read the end of my post. This isn't making Demacia "grey" by simply retconning what made them good in the first place with no explanation as to why. Demacia was always grey because of implied Xenophobia, zealotry, CHILD SOLDIER BRAINWASHING, and their "everyone is equal under Justice" applying harsh but fair punishments to even minor offences.

This is taking an aspect of them that made them optimistic and good and simply erasing it in favor of a more cliche system of government for no given reason.

What you list here however was only barely present. Yes Luxs case was rather bad,but it pales in comparison to what other city states have done and it was pretty much the only case of something really bad. The Xenophobia was barely present,especially with demacia having champs like Poppy Sona Shyvana none of which are demacians originally(XinZhao most likely too).Out of those only shyvana was shown having social problems with demacia(which is more because she is a half dragon and not because she is an outsider)

And you yourself mention that they apply harsh but fair punishments,it was simply never shown what that actually means. Now we know what they mean with "harsh/draconic"

In the end you can't make something that is morally white(or light grey) grey without adding more black to it.

Quinn expressly proves that you can rise from peasantry to Knighthood, Xin Zhao isn't even Demacian and he's the right hand of the King, Poppy and Shyvana are raised to high station completely based on merit. Also the ONLY three generals we've seen are Garen, Jarvan, and the unnamed one in Hecarim's lore. And we don't even know if HE'S a noble.

You merely assume that quinn has risen to knighthood. Her lore never mentions that she did.She became part of the elite,but that doesn't have to equal actual knighthood and doesn't mean that she got into any leading positions.

All Might Jr1 votes

It really doesn't help that the lore team is quite simply the most quiet of pretty much any team. Only really showing up in Q&As and leaving us dry 99% of the time.

Hyrum Graff1 votes

I don't think Demacia is black now, as you seem to imply.

However, I do think that Riot's going the wrong way about showing the grey. I'd rather see them show grey by showing GREY. Not by showing black and white in completely separate places.

It isn't, "Demacia has upsides and also downsides," it's, "Demacia's upsides ARE its downsides."

Defin8lyNotScott1 votes

I heartily agree that Demacia had enough dark aspects that they didn't need to add sexism to the mix. I don't mind so much exploring the draconian aspects of Demacian law, since I was always under the impression that their ""zero-tolerance" moral code" would be incredibly harsh, but there is so little evidence of patriarchy previous to this new lore that it does irk me. Your statement about it being "generic" hits right on target for me. I was really enjoying a fantasy world WITHOUT the (ever-present) patriarchal overtones you see in so many world-settings. Cry "historical accuracy" all you want. If I can believe in magic, and dragons, and people who spin without getting dizzy, I can believe in a medieval style country that lacks sexism.

More from Story, Art, & Sound

More by All Might Jr