Why not make A.S. benevolent instead of arrogant?

math crab·3/18/2016, 3:26:48 AM·3 votes·1,023 views

I understand that Aurelion Sol is definitely in a position to be smug, but I've felt since his teaser that his character might be better off if his fatal flaw was kindness rather than hubris. Aurelion has affection for every star in the universe, and should presumably have affection for the universe in general. He could just as easily act as a humble, benevolent, djinn-like figure to lesser beings- vastly more powerful, yet willing to serve. Were this the case, his backstory- accepting a crown from humans, and being held hostage by it- would still make sense. Although incredibly strong, he is pure enough to be easily fooled and corrupted by human beings.

Sidenote: This makes his character fall more in line with IRL mythological elements while actually subverting the stereotype of a dragon. In most myths, when a giant or an ogre or a dragon- any powerful being- is manipulated into doing something against its will by a human's appeal to its hubris, the monster is the evil bad guy and the human is the clever hero. In his lore as it is now, our subconscious impulse is still to root for the humans who outwit the dragon with their clever crown. This somewhat dulls the emotional impact of a very tragic turn of events. If Aurelion Sol were pure- sort of an archetypical unicorn rather than an archetypical dragon, if you will- I think the idea of a creator deity being enslaved by his own creations would hit the audience way harder.

And, in the present, I think his character would have been more morally intriguing. As a benevolent god of creation, Aurelion would presumably be horrified at the idea of destroying his precious stars (this comes across in his lore already, in fact). The purpose of the crown, then, should be made more abstract- the stars are not disappearing from the night sky as punishment for Aurelion's disobedience, but rather as a result of Aurelion's direct actions. Looking at modern myth, he would serve (in his crowned state) as a sort of Galactus - Silver Surfer fusion. Galactus terrifies us because of classic cosmic horror elements; the Silver Surfer intrigues us as a sympathetic character forced to serve destruction. Marvel has done great sci-fi mythmaking, but these two are definitely their best. The creator is forced to destroy his own creation- against his will, no less. If there is any way to make puny mortals feel very sorry for God, this is it. A final reason to justify this personality change is clarity. I personally think that a benevolent Aurelion Sol is more appealing and perhaps more complex than an arrogant Aurelion Sol, but the biggest advantage here is the extent to which it simplifies his motivation and his backstory in general. Watch: Aurelion Sol is a benevolent demigod that made all of the stars in the universe. A long time ago, humans tricked Aurelion Sol into accepting a gift, a crown, that let them control his power. Since then, the once-loving dragon has been forced to destroy his own creations against his will. But the crown's power over him is waning. Aurelion Sol has returned to Mt. Targon to attempt to overthrow his masters and save what remains of the cosmos- from himself.

I find that very compelling. As is, it feels like Aurelion Sol is only trying to overpower his crown so that he can be a ruthless dick on his own terms. Maybe more realistic, but the stakes don't seem high and neither side of the conflict grabs my attention.

3 Comments

GreenLore3/18/2016, 10:40:54 AM1 votes

The reason is likely because that would have turned him into Soraka 2.0 I mean both would be beings that are connected to the stars,both would be really nice and both would be tricked/betrayed by someone that kinda limits them in some way(aurelion looses his freedom,soraka her immortality)

Also I overall disagree that it would make him more appealing. First of all it would pretty much destroy the moral ambiguity of the lore.The way it is now we don't know why the targonians enslaved him,they might have done it in order to protect their worlds from threats like the void,which would be a kinda noble goal,even if the means are horrible. But your version would make it clear that the targonians are evil a-holes that enslaved him for their own prurpose(i mean if aurelion was that benevolent,then they could have just asked him).

Then there is the fact that you assume that most people would instinctively still root for the targonians(by the way it was never said that the targonians are human),but I'd say there lies the twist in it,that Aurelion is the victim here and the targonians are those who act morally questionable(if not downright evil),something that is made rather clear in his lore. Not to mention that comparing aurelion to some evil monster is kind of unfitting considering that Aurelion is a much more neutral being.

Last but not least,your version at the end doesn't make that much sense. I mean it says he has been "forced to destroy his own creations against his will.",but why would the targonians force him to destroy the stars(those are his creations,not the planets)?Like what would they gain from that?

KrugLyfe3/18/2016, 12:45:50 PM1 votes

I prefer evil and ready to kill NEXT!

Trylobyte3/18/2016, 12:52:20 PM1 votes

Because dragons in Runeterra, like dragons in most fantasy works, are inherently arrogant creatures. The more power they think they have the larger their ego gets. While rift dragon isn't intelligent enough to speak it certainly thinks it's a badass and Shyvana certainly seems to have a high opinion of herself, so why would Aurelion Sol be any nicer? There's also the issue that, being so far out of the realm of mortal comprehension, his morals might also be similarly alien if he even considers morality at all.

I'd argue he is actually a kind, compassionate individual... towards the stars. The little things that depend on them don't matter so much to him. He's also (somewhat) more civil to those 'on his level' (Bard, Nagakabouros) and Soraka than he is with most others.