I think the reason the hosts
&
are also referred to as the Aspects, are because the Aspects from Targon prime now reside within their bodies.
The clearest example is
upon entering Atreus body it is stated that Atreus' persona was erased effectively leaving Pantheon in control. A parasitic/ commensalistic relationship.
This is also the case with
&
, their respective Aspect's reside within their bodies granting them their powers, knowledge and memories. However they have left the original souls of the hosts intact and are (depending on the Aspect) in a mutualistic/ commensalistic relationship. Therefore 'their entity' as a whole (both Aspect and host as one being) could be referred to as an Aspect.
From
's short:
"She flexed her fingers on the leather-wound grip of her sword, feeling the surge-tide of power within her. A coiled fire that ached to be released. Leona held it within her, letting it ease into her flesh. Embers flecked her eyes and her heart pounded in her chest. The being she had joined with atop the mountain longed to burn these men with its cleansing fire."
From
's short story:
"A memory, yes, but not her own. This was something else, something drawn from the fractured recollections of the celestial essence that shared her flesh."
"The essence within Diana surged. It filled her thoughts with undying hatred from a distant epoch. She glimpsed ancient battles so terrible that entire worlds had been lost in the fires of their waging; a war that had almost unmade this very world and still might."
Order of decreasing mutualistic relationship (imo) would be:
- Taric is the only one without specific lines of 'fusing' rather using the term 'imbued', but I'm assuming said fusion is the basis of how the Aspects work for consistency.
- The Aspect of Twilight can hinder Zoe's use of portals, I'm assuming this is a special case since it's role is the 'messenger of Targon' and 'Herald of change', holds significance to the Aspect.
